Chen七月千顺
Verified Creator
X: @ChenJuly777 | Just a girl navigating the crypto landscape. Market insights, daily news, and a dash of wit.
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
5.8 Months
2.5K+ Following
38.8K+ Followers
28.8K+ Liked
2.2K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
The author of 'Rich Dad Poor Dad', Kiyosaki, is back to knock on the blackboard! 🔥
His recent post indicates that countries around the world are frantically printing money, and debt is skyrocketing without limits. If you are still tightly clutching cash and savings in US dollars, your wealth will only be slowly drained by inflation. Moreover, with geopolitical conflicts showing no signs of resolution, oil prices simply cannot drop, and the painful days of high inflation may last for a long time.
In this era of massive monetary expansion, ordinary people are competing based on 'financial awareness'. Kiyosaki's attitude is very clear: the depreciation of fiat currency is inevitable, and if you want to protect your wealth, you must focus on real hard currencies. In addition to the gold, silver, oil, and reserve grains he has always emphasized, this time he once again strongly supports $BTC and $ETH 🚀!
When traditional financial tycoons are treating cryptocurrency as a lifebuoy, have you exchanged the fiat currency in your hand for core assets? What positions are everyone holding to combat inflation? Share your thoughts in the comments👇
#BTC #ETH
His recent post indicates that countries around the world are frantically printing money, and debt is skyrocketing without limits. If you are still tightly clutching cash and savings in US dollars, your wealth will only be slowly drained by inflation. Moreover, with geopolitical conflicts showing no signs of resolution, oil prices simply cannot drop, and the painful days of high inflation may last for a long time.
In this era of massive monetary expansion, ordinary people are competing based on 'financial awareness'. Kiyosaki's attitude is very clear: the depreciation of fiat currency is inevitable, and if you want to protect your wealth, you must focus on real hard currencies. In addition to the gold, silver, oil, and reserve grains he has always emphasized, this time he once again strongly supports $BTC and $ETH 🚀!
When traditional financial tycoons are treating cryptocurrency as a lifebuoy, have you exchanged the fiat currency in your hand for core assets? What positions are everyone holding to combat inflation? Share your thoughts in the comments👇
#BTC #ETH
The most dangerous aspect of digital identity is not password leakage, but rather that you don't know where it is stored.
Have you clicked 'remember password'?
There's a high probability you've clicked it. And after clicking it, you never thought about it again!!!
The browser fills it in for you, the phone syncs it for you, and logging in becomes so smooth that it almost feels non-existent. The problem is, behind this smoothness, there is one thing that many people have never really thought about: where is this password actually stored?
Is it on your local device?
Has it been synced to the cloud already?
Has it been taken over by a third-party password management service that you are not very familiar with?
If there is a problem one day, did you lose it yourself, or was it compromised on someone else's end?
There's a high probability you've clicked it. And after clicking it, you never thought about it again!!!
The browser fills it in for you, the phone syncs it for you, and logging in becomes so smooth that it almost feels non-existent. The problem is, behind this smoothness, there is one thing that many people have never really thought about: where is this password actually stored?
Is it on your local device?
Has it been synced to the cloud already?
Has it been taken over by a third-party password management service that you are not very familiar with?
If there is a problem one day, did you lose it yourself, or was it compromised on someone else's end?
Those who have gone through the seed round basically accept one premise: the project may fail. But what really causes anxiety is the black box period after the money is sent!!!
The project party says they are working on the product, and when you ask about the progress, the reply is that it’s coming soon. Half a year passes, the product hasn't come out, and a considerable amount of money has been spent. You don’t even know where this money has actually gone. Some institutions in the Middle East that do early-stage investment have also complained about similar issues, having invested in a bunch of Web3 seed rounds, with post-investment management largely relying on the project party's self-reporting, making it very difficult to independently verify the truth.
The most awkward part of this is that you bear shareholder-level risks, but all you get is the right to listen to reports.
The core issue here is whether post-investment data can be directly queried and whether audit materials can be standardized for export. @SignOfficial In the white paper, the Governance & Operations section actually supplements this layer.
It requires that the monitoring dashboards must have real-time indicators such as issuance volume, verification volume, distribution volume, and API latency. The focus is not on how professional the terms are, but on the fact that these are not self-reports in the post-investment report, but rather data generated by the system that investors can directly view.
Furthermore, the ruleset_version and ruleset_hash in the Evidence Artifact are also crucial. Every time the project party changes rules or adjusts parameters, they must leave a record on the chain. This way, you are not just hearing that they optimized it, but you can verify exactly which version was changed and whether the changes are as they said.
Then there’s the Audit Export Package. In the past, many post-investment materials were just a PPT that was very full but hard to verify. Sign has standardized the audit package format. Signed approvals, logs, and reconciliation outputs are bundled together and can also be machine-readable. This way, post-investment is not about looking at reports, but about verifying evidence.
Speaking of $SIGN , it’s very hardcore. Web3 financing is originally a large market, and post-investment auditing is a basic need for institutions. Each audit package generates attestations, every API call that checks monitoring data, and every evidence artifact generated by rule changes are essentially protocol consumption. The larger the money, the heavier the compliance, and the more frequent the calls. #Sign地缘政治基建
Therefore, the most uncomfortable part of the seed round is that after the money is invested, you remain in the black box for a long time. If this set of things from Sign can really be implemented, it supplements the shift in post-investment from hearing reports to checking for oneself.
The project party says they are working on the product, and when you ask about the progress, the reply is that it’s coming soon. Half a year passes, the product hasn't come out, and a considerable amount of money has been spent. You don’t even know where this money has actually gone. Some institutions in the Middle East that do early-stage investment have also complained about similar issues, having invested in a bunch of Web3 seed rounds, with post-investment management largely relying on the project party's self-reporting, making it very difficult to independently verify the truth.
The most awkward part of this is that you bear shareholder-level risks, but all you get is the right to listen to reports.
The core issue here is whether post-investment data can be directly queried and whether audit materials can be standardized for export. @SignOfficial In the white paper, the Governance & Operations section actually supplements this layer.
It requires that the monitoring dashboards must have real-time indicators such as issuance volume, verification volume, distribution volume, and API latency. The focus is not on how professional the terms are, but on the fact that these are not self-reports in the post-investment report, but rather data generated by the system that investors can directly view.
Furthermore, the ruleset_version and ruleset_hash in the Evidence Artifact are also crucial. Every time the project party changes rules or adjusts parameters, they must leave a record on the chain. This way, you are not just hearing that they optimized it, but you can verify exactly which version was changed and whether the changes are as they said.
Then there’s the Audit Export Package. In the past, many post-investment materials were just a PPT that was very full but hard to verify. Sign has standardized the audit package format. Signed approvals, logs, and reconciliation outputs are bundled together and can also be machine-readable. This way, post-investment is not about looking at reports, but about verifying evidence.
Speaking of $SIGN , it’s very hardcore. Web3 financing is originally a large market, and post-investment auditing is a basic need for institutions. Each audit package generates attestations, every API call that checks monitoring data, and every evidence artifact generated by rule changes are essentially protocol consumption. The larger the money, the heavier the compliance, and the more frequent the calls. #Sign地缘政治基建
Therefore, the most uncomfortable part of the seed round is that after the money is invested, you remain in the black box for a long time. If this set of things from Sign can really be implemented, it supplements the shift in post-investment from hearing reports to checking for oneself.
B
SIGN/USDT
Price
0.03187
I took a glance at the latest on-chain heatmap, and I'll briefly discuss the current situation of Bitcoin 📊
Currently, the BTC price is exactly at the lower edge of the new entry players' cost zone between 60,000 and 70,000 dollars. Although it can be seen that there is capital slowly accumulating in this position, the overall scale is still below the typical levels that have historically driven strong rebounds, and the concentration of chips is relatively weak.
In summary, the bottom structure is slowly being built, but the strength of the bulls is still not enough at this moment. To take off directly, we need to wait for clearer signals. Stay patient, observe more, and act less 👀
#BTC行情
Currently, the BTC price is exactly at the lower edge of the new entry players' cost zone between 60,000 and 70,000 dollars. Although it can be seen that there is capital slowly accumulating in this position, the overall scale is still below the typical levels that have historically driven strong rebounds, and the concentration of chips is relatively weak.
In summary, the bottom structure is slowly being built, but the strength of the bulls is still not enough at this moment. To take off directly, we need to wait for clearer signals. Stay patient, observe more, and act less 👀
#BTC行情
What you bought is not a second-hand car; what you bought is a piece of history that may have been edited.
People who have bought second-hand cars have all experienced that kind of unease.
When a dealer lays a stack of records in front of you, showing that maintenance was done on time, there were no major accidents, and the mileage looks good, they might add, 'You can trust this car.' It sounds very complete, but there's always a nagging doubt in your mind about whether what you've seen is the entire record or just the part they want you to see???
The biggest disadvantage of second-hand cars often isn't just the car's condition itself, but rather how easily the records can be tampered with.
Adjusting the odometer is something that knowledgeable people find unremarkable. Changing the mileage from over 100,000 kilometers to 50,000 or 60,000 instantly alters the appearance, and the price can be raised a bit more. The bigger problem is that many buyers ultimately fail not because they don't understand cars, but because the information is incomplete. Because you're not trading a car; you're making judgments based on a pile of records that may have been edited, filtered, or stitched together.
When a dealer lays a stack of records in front of you, showing that maintenance was done on time, there were no major accidents, and the mileage looks good, they might add, 'You can trust this car.' It sounds very complete, but there's always a nagging doubt in your mind about whether what you've seen is the entire record or just the part they want you to see???
The biggest disadvantage of second-hand cars often isn't just the car's condition itself, but rather how easily the records can be tampered with.
Adjusting the odometer is something that knowledgeable people find unremarkable. Changing the mileage from over 100,000 kilometers to 50,000 or 60,000 instantly alters the appearance, and the price can be raised a bit more. The bigger problem is that many buyers ultimately fail not because they don't understand cars, but because the information is incomplete. Because you're not trading a car; you're making judgments based on a pile of records that may have been edited, filtered, or stitched together.
What freelancers fear the most is often not the lack of work, but rather completing the work and not getting paid!!! 😭
After two weeks of rushing to deliver the work, the client first says it's good, then a few days later says it needs to be revised. You grit your teeth and revise it three times, and the other party just disappears. What's even more troublesome are international orders, especially dealing with clients in the Middle East, where the distance is far, identities are unclear, and the communication chain is long. You say you sent the documents, and the other party says they didn't receive them; you provide email screenshots as proof, and they say screenshots can be forged. Is there a contract? A few verbal agreements in WeChat count too. But when it comes to protecting your rights, attorney fees might be more expensive than the order itself.
So what really holds these types of collaborations back is not whether the client seems reliable, but whether the agreements can be nailed down, whether the delivery can be confirmed, and whether the money can be automatically transferred according to the conditions.
Until recently, I came across the project @SignOfficial , and I felt that some aspects were clarified. EthSign can first write the work agreement as an on-chain Proof of Agreement, clearly stating the delivery content, acceptance criteria, and payment milestones. After both parties sign, neither can back out. Furthermore, TokenTable addresses the layer that freelancers are most concerned about: it’s not just that the client said they would pay, but that the money is put in according to the rules first. For example, releasing 50% upon the first delivery and the final 50% upon acceptance. The white paper already supports cliff and conditional unlocking, and this phased payment logic is just right for international orders. #Sign地缘政治基建
If combined with attestation to confirm that the delivery has been accepted, then subsequent payments will no longer rely on disputes, but will be executed according to conditions. Who confirmed, when it was confirmed, and whether payments should be made can all be verified on-chain.
Speaking of $SIGN , this is not about forcing it either. The global freelance market is already in the scale of billions, and every on-chain contract, every delivery confirmation, and every condition-based payment execution is a protocol invocation. The more international collaboration there is, the higher the invocation volume.
So what freelancers fear the most is really not the lack of work, but that after working hard, they still have to look at other people's faces to get paid. If this set of tools can truly be integrated into real scenarios, what it fills in is not just a more advanced contract signing, but the foundational layer of payment security in international orders.
After two weeks of rushing to deliver the work, the client first says it's good, then a few days later says it needs to be revised. You grit your teeth and revise it three times, and the other party just disappears. What's even more troublesome are international orders, especially dealing with clients in the Middle East, where the distance is far, identities are unclear, and the communication chain is long. You say you sent the documents, and the other party says they didn't receive them; you provide email screenshots as proof, and they say screenshots can be forged. Is there a contract? A few verbal agreements in WeChat count too. But when it comes to protecting your rights, attorney fees might be more expensive than the order itself.
So what really holds these types of collaborations back is not whether the client seems reliable, but whether the agreements can be nailed down, whether the delivery can be confirmed, and whether the money can be automatically transferred according to the conditions.
Until recently, I came across the project @SignOfficial , and I felt that some aspects were clarified. EthSign can first write the work agreement as an on-chain Proof of Agreement, clearly stating the delivery content, acceptance criteria, and payment milestones. After both parties sign, neither can back out. Furthermore, TokenTable addresses the layer that freelancers are most concerned about: it’s not just that the client said they would pay, but that the money is put in according to the rules first. For example, releasing 50% upon the first delivery and the final 50% upon acceptance. The white paper already supports cliff and conditional unlocking, and this phased payment logic is just right for international orders. #Sign地缘政治基建
If combined with attestation to confirm that the delivery has been accepted, then subsequent payments will no longer rely on disputes, but will be executed according to conditions. Who confirmed, when it was confirmed, and whether payments should be made can all be verified on-chain.
Speaking of $SIGN , this is not about forcing it either. The global freelance market is already in the scale of billions, and every on-chain contract, every delivery confirmation, and every condition-based payment execution is a protocol invocation. The more international collaboration there is, the higher the invocation volume.
So what freelancers fear the most is really not the lack of work, but that after working hard, they still have to look at other people's faces to get paid. If this set of tools can truly be integrated into real scenarios, what it fills in is not just a more advanced contract signing, but the foundational layer of payment security in international orders.
B
SIGN/USDT
Price
0.03198
·
--
🎙️ Many troops are being beaten, while the air force is enjoying the meat?
End
04 h 24 m 50 s
24.7k
70
Single coin loss of 19,000 USD? Bitcoin mining companies are quitting and directly turning to AI
Now the mining cost has flipped too severely, the survival rule for mining tycoons has become:
Sell $BTC for cash ➡️ Crazy investment in HPC data centers ➡️ Transform into AI computing power suppliers.
CoinShares revealed that these listed mining companies have already engaged in over 70 billion USD of AI collaborations. In the past, it was a competition of who could mine more, now it's a competition of whose computing power can feed the large models. The big reshuffle in the mining sector has begun.
Now the mining cost has flipped too severely, the survival rule for mining tycoons has become:
Sell $BTC for cash ➡️ Crazy investment in HPC data centers ➡️ Transform into AI computing power suppliers.
CoinShares revealed that these listed mining companies have already engaged in over 70 billion USD of AI collaborations. In the past, it was a competition of who could mine more, now it's a competition of whose computing power can feed the large models. The big reshuffle in the mining sector has begun.
Last month, a certain celebrity concert tickets went on sale. The organizer claimed there were only 1,000 tickets available worldwide, with a price of ten thousand each. I was quite happy to grab one, but on the day of the concert, it was clear that there were definitely more than 1,000 people present. Later, someone calculated that 1,500 tickets had been circulated on a certain second-hand platform. The organizer insisted that only 1,000 tickets were released, but no one believes it, and no one can prove he lied.
The central bank controls the issuance of banknotes, with each bill having a unique serial number and total quantity made public, allowing anyone to verify how many are in circulation. However, for concert tickets, the organizer claims they are limited, and you can't verify it at all. He might have printed 2,000 tickets, might have printed more later, or might have privately copied them; you would never know.
The Sign Protocol for @SignOfficial can turn this claim by the organizer into a verifiable fact on the blockchain. When tickets are issued, an Attestation of ticket issuance is created on the chain, locking in a total of 1,000 tickets. For each ticket sold, a sub-Attestation is generated, numbered from 001 to 1000, and the total on the chain can be checked by anyone in real-time. If 2,000 people are found at the scene, it is immediately known that someone oversold or issued fake tickets, leaving no room for the organizer to deny it.
Global concerts, sports events, and limited edition products amount to billions of tickets each year; each claim of limitation is a potential trust game, and every issuance volume Attestation is a real invocation of the $SIGN protocol!
$SIGN #Sign地缘政治基建
The central bank controls the issuance of banknotes, with each bill having a unique serial number and total quantity made public, allowing anyone to verify how many are in circulation. However, for concert tickets, the organizer claims they are limited, and you can't verify it at all. He might have printed 2,000 tickets, might have printed more later, or might have privately copied them; you would never know.
The Sign Protocol for @SignOfficial can turn this claim by the organizer into a verifiable fact on the blockchain. When tickets are issued, an Attestation of ticket issuance is created on the chain, locking in a total of 1,000 tickets. For each ticket sold, a sub-Attestation is generated, numbered from 001 to 1000, and the total on the chain can be checked by anyone in real-time. If 2,000 people are found at the scene, it is immediately known that someone oversold or issued fake tickets, leaving no room for the organizer to deny it.
Global concerts, sports events, and limited edition products amount to billions of tickets each year; each claim of limitation is a potential trust game, and every issuance volume Attestation is a real invocation of the $SIGN protocol!
$SIGN #Sign地缘政治基建
B
SIGN/USDT
Price
0.03184
What really leads to disputes is not that it wasn't transferred, but that the rules were never locked down.
Last month, I helped a DeFi project as a consultant. The founder messaged me at two in the morning: the token lock-up period is over, and we need to unlock for 200 early contributors. I checked the table three times, but still, 12 addresses didn't match. Some said they didn't receive it, some said they received too much, and the community is already starting to curse!
My first reaction after reading it wasn't to help him check the table, but rather to feel that this situation was too familiar. After a while, there will always be some project that falls into the same pit again. Change the project name, change the token name, but the script is still the same script.
Later, he asked me a question, and I felt like he hit the nail on the head.
My first reaction after reading it wasn't to help him check the table, but rather to feel that this situation was too familiar. After a while, there will always be some project that falls into the same pit again. Change the project name, change the token name, but the script is still the same script.
Later, he asked me a question, and I felt like he hit the nail on the head.
In the past 4 hours, the entire network had liquidations of 259 million USD, with long positions liquidated at 249 million USD and short positions liquidated at 9.8817 million USD.👻
Among them, BTC liquidations amounted to 118 million USD, and ETH liquidations totaled 7.36592 million USD.
#美伊和谈陷僵局 #BTC行情
Among them, BTC liquidations amounted to 118 million USD, and ETH liquidations totaled 7.36592 million USD.
#美伊和谈陷僵局 #BTC行情
No prize quiz, does any great literary master know the answer?
Trump: I might do something crazy
Big Pie: 📉
Trump: Maybe I won't do it
Big Pie: 📈
Trump: But if I really do...
Big Pie: 📉
Trump: Forget it, I was just kidding
Big Pie: 📈
Trump: Actually, I’m not joking
Big Pie: 📉
Trump: Haha, I’m just joking
Big Pie: 📈
#Trump hopes to end the war with Iran as soon as possible
Big Pie: 📉
Trump: Maybe I won't do it
Big Pie: 📈
Trump: But if I really do...
Big Pie: 📉
Trump: Forget it, I was just kidding
Big Pie: 📈
Trump: Actually, I’m not joking
Big Pie: 📉
Trump: Haha, I’m just joking
Big Pie: 📈
#Trump hopes to end the war with Iran as soon as possible
Every time I go to a new platform, I have to resubmit my ID; this logic is inherently flawed.
Every time I do KYC, I feel extremely annoyed. So much so that I eventually just save the front and back of my ID and a selfie in my phone’s photo album to avoid taking new pictures each time. But even if I save them, it doesn’t help; when it comes time for verification, I still have to tilt my head and squint at the camera for ages, with the system repeatedly telling me to keep my face within the frame. It takes several attempts before I can pass.
One day when I was free, I seriously counted how many times I had done this. Once for Binance, once for the exchange next door, once for a DEX, plus the bank and brokerage. With the front and back of my ID and a selfie, I conservatively must have submitted seven or eight copies. Each submission contains my face, ID number, and real address, all stored in the databases of seven or eight different platforms. Previously, I wanted to go to Buildpad for a new one, but they wouldn’t let me use it and didn’t provide a specific reason. It felt like being discriminated against. But on the other hand, even if they let you pass, it’s still unsettling knowing there’s another place storing your information, creating yet another potential leak.
One day when I was free, I seriously counted how many times I had done this. Once for Binance, once for the exchange next door, once for a DEX, plus the bank and brokerage. With the front and back of my ID and a selfie, I conservatively must have submitted seven or eight copies. Each submission contains my face, ID number, and real address, all stored in the databases of seven or eight different platforms. Previously, I wanted to go to Buildpad for a new one, but they wouldn’t let me use it and didn’t provide a specific reason. It felt like being discriminated against. But on the other hand, even if they let you pass, it’s still unsettling knowing there’s another place storing your information, creating yet another potential leak.
When I signed my labor contract before starting work, I experienced a particularly passive situation. The contract was a blank framework template; after I filled in my personal information and signed it, the company directly took the original document away. I asked if I could have a copy. They gave me one, but when I looked at it, it was a blank photocopy, and none of the content I filled in or my signature was on it. Essentially, what I signed and the specific details inside were entirely at the company's discretion, and I had nothing in hand.
The most powerless moment for workers isn't the 996 schedule; it's discovering that, when something happens, all the evidence is in the other party's hands!
The situation in the Middle East is even more absurd. The employment contracts for millions of foreign workers in Dubai are mostly in Arabic, which many people can't understand, and they have no idea if changes are made after signing.
This mechanism itself doesn't leave any leverage for the weaker party.
Thinking about this, I revisited what EthSign is doing inside @SignOfficial and realized it's aimed at resolving this deadlock. The logic is straightforward: when you sign a contract, the complete content of the document, signing time, and document hash value are all written onto the chain. It's immutable and doesn't rely on any party to keep the original. After signing, both parties always see the same document; if any tampering occurs, a quick hash comparison will immediately reveal it.
Additionally, the signing proof itself is an on-chain attestation, not stored on any company's server or in a notary's file cabinet. It's on the chain, accessible for both parties to invoke and verify at any time, so no one can say, "My version isn't like this."
In a business context, the consumption scale is quite significant. A company processes labor contracts on a large scale every year, along with procurement agreements, compliance documents, and confidentiality agreements. Each document signed on the chain generates an attestation. This isn't the frequency that individual users occasionally use; it's a continuous and stable consumption in B2B scenarios. $SIGN serves as a medium of verification and circulation in this process, handling the business volume that keeps running in daily corporate operations.
Looking back at the moment I signed that contract, the company had already lost the moment they took away the original document. They lost because the mechanism didn't leave you with any fallback. The question of whether we can take "what was signed" out of one party's hands and place it in an immutable location should have been taken seriously and resolved long ago.
#Sign地缘政治基建
The most powerless moment for workers isn't the 996 schedule; it's discovering that, when something happens, all the evidence is in the other party's hands!
The situation in the Middle East is even more absurd. The employment contracts for millions of foreign workers in Dubai are mostly in Arabic, which many people can't understand, and they have no idea if changes are made after signing.
This mechanism itself doesn't leave any leverage for the weaker party.
Thinking about this, I revisited what EthSign is doing inside @SignOfficial and realized it's aimed at resolving this deadlock. The logic is straightforward: when you sign a contract, the complete content of the document, signing time, and document hash value are all written onto the chain. It's immutable and doesn't rely on any party to keep the original. After signing, both parties always see the same document; if any tampering occurs, a quick hash comparison will immediately reveal it.
Additionally, the signing proof itself is an on-chain attestation, not stored on any company's server or in a notary's file cabinet. It's on the chain, accessible for both parties to invoke and verify at any time, so no one can say, "My version isn't like this."
In a business context, the consumption scale is quite significant. A company processes labor contracts on a large scale every year, along with procurement agreements, compliance documents, and confidentiality agreements. Each document signed on the chain generates an attestation. This isn't the frequency that individual users occasionally use; it's a continuous and stable consumption in B2B scenarios. $SIGN serves as a medium of verification and circulation in this process, handling the business volume that keeps running in daily corporate operations.
Looking back at the moment I signed that contract, the company had already lost the moment they took away the original document. They lost because the mechanism didn't leave you with any fallback. The question of whether we can take "what was signed" out of one party's hands and place it in an immutable location should have been taken seriously and resolved long ago.
#Sign地缘政治基建
B
SIGN/USDT
Price
0.03215
·
--
🎙️ Constructing the square, regardless of the east or west .·`~ 💛 🌹 💕~..
End
06 h 00 m 00 s
15.3k
19
Recently, the understanding king has become a bit anxious, with internal whispers saying they want to quickly withdraw from the conflict in Iran. To put it bluntly, this war is too costly and has directly pushed up inflation in the United States. With the midterm elections approaching, if the geopolitical tug-of-war continues, voters will only care about the cost of living, and a significant number of ballots will be lost.
From the perspective of us cryptocurrency investors, what direct impact does this macro trend have on Bitcoin?
🔥 Inflation cooling = liquidity expectations: If the war can truly cool down within a few weeks according to his script, and energy prices fall, the inflation pressure in the U.S. will decrease significantly. The Federal Reserve will have fewer excuses to maintain high interest rates, and once interest rate cut expectations rise, it will be the most direct benefit for risk assets.
⚠️ Short-term pin warning: Although they want to withdraw, the White House currently does not have a reliable exit plan. In the upcoming period, the progress of peace talks and front-line friction will definitely be repeatedly pulled back and forth. Such news-driven markets are the easiest to have upward and downward pins, so brothers trading contracts should watch more and act less, and must strictly set stop-losses.
📈 The 'implicit support' of election years: The understanding king is shifting attention back to domestic economy and elections, which means they must deliver a good economic report soon. The macro environment in election years is usually warmer, setting a good tone for the upcoming trends in the cryptocurrency market.
Geopolitical cooling is definitely a medium to long-term positive for macro liquidity, but in the short term, we must guard against high volatility caused by news.
If this wave truly leads to a ceasefire, do you think liquidity expectations can directly push Bitcoin past the current resistance level?
From the perspective of us cryptocurrency investors, what direct impact does this macro trend have on Bitcoin?
🔥 Inflation cooling = liquidity expectations: If the war can truly cool down within a few weeks according to his script, and energy prices fall, the inflation pressure in the U.S. will decrease significantly. The Federal Reserve will have fewer excuses to maintain high interest rates, and once interest rate cut expectations rise, it will be the most direct benefit for risk assets.
⚠️ Short-term pin warning: Although they want to withdraw, the White House currently does not have a reliable exit plan. In the upcoming period, the progress of peace talks and front-line friction will definitely be repeatedly pulled back and forth. Such news-driven markets are the easiest to have upward and downward pins, so brothers trading contracts should watch more and act less, and must strictly set stop-losses.
📈 The 'implicit support' of election years: The understanding king is shifting attention back to domestic economy and elections, which means they must deliver a good economic report soon. The macro environment in election years is usually warmer, setting a good tone for the upcoming trends in the cryptocurrency market.
Geopolitical cooling is definitely a medium to long-term positive for macro liquidity, but in the short term, we must guard against high volatility caused by news.
If this wave truly leads to a ceasefire, do you think liquidity expectations can directly push Bitcoin past the current resistance level?
Login to explore more contents