交易员-周同学

🔥Ultimate Guide to Avoiding Pinching with Alpha! Losing 10% on Coin Purchases Instantly? Here's How to Operate Without Getting Stuck!

Brothers, pay attention! The stable Alpha coin is becoming increasingly scarce. The probability of being pinched or suspended while earning points, leading to significant losses, is skyrocketing—losing 100U on a single transaction of 1000U can happen in just one minute. The more you hesitate to cut losses, the deeper you get caught, directly missing out on several airdrops!

Here are 4 tested and effective tips to avoid pitfalls, make sure to take note:

1. Check Stability First: Go to alpha123.uk, only trade coins with double green dots, and pass on the unstable ones;
2. Keep an Eye on 1-Minute Candlestick: Remember the mantra “If the enemy moves, I don’t move; if the enemy doesn’t move, I move.” Stop when volatility is high, and operate when it's stable;
3. Don't Randomly Place Buy Orders: Price should be close to the transaction price, only let the fourth non-zero digit be 1-2 higher, to avoid too much deviation;
4. Setting Sell Orders is Key (Important!): Don't believe the saying “the fourth and fifth digits are the same,” setting it like this for four times the points will definitely get you suspended! It's recommended to set it 1-2% lower than the transaction price; Alpha's limit price will transact at the optimal price, reducing the probability of getting stuck while also lowering wear and tear.

By following these steps, you can greatly avoid losses and earn points with peace of mind! Follow me for continuous sharing of practical tips in the crypto circle～
#ALPHA @Morpho Labs 🦋 #Morpho $MORPHO

Alpha Score Boosting: Low Wear No Clamp Strategy

Friends who have been "clamped" (loss of score) come here, sharing my practical methods; feel free to ask if you don't understand!

1. Choose Coins: Prioritize coins with low price volatility to reduce risk.
2. Core Ordering Techniques: Keep the first four decimal places of the buy and sell prices consistent (starting from 0.0). For example, buy at 0.41342002, sell at 0.4134; align the first four digits "4134". This way, for every increase of 1 in the 5th digit, you earn 0.1U, and for every decrease, you only lose 0.1U. If you're lucky, you can trade at the same price, resulting in extremely low wear—like in the picture, the price difference is 0.00000001, and for 1040 yuan per order, the wear is only 0.001U.
3. Score Reference: Complete 8 orders to earn 4x points coins, earning 17 points daily; 16 orders earn 18 points.

Want to save more on fees? Use wallet transactions for 4x points coins. If you bind the invitation code now, you can get a 10% fee rebate, and it adds up quickly, which is like getting a small airdrop for free. This is a new Binance feature, available on mobile, and future rebates will increase.

Binding Steps:

1. - Find "Invite" on the wallet page;
2. - Select "Enter Invitation Code" (10% fee discount);
3. - Enter the invitation code KV3QAI1O

Follow me for the latest money-saving tips, let's earn stable money together!
#ALPHA #空投大毛 @Morpho Labs 🦋 $MORPHO #Morpho

After going through mainstream privacy projects on the market, I feel more and more that the positioning of the Midnight project is somewhat special, even a bit "abnormal".

During this time, I specifically compared a range of privacy tracks and found that everyone is basically on the same path of competition: comparing anonymity, comparing anti-tracking capabilities, comparing who hides deeper. The direction itself is not a problem, but after seeing more, it becomes apparent that everyone is more like competing on parameters, making it difficult to see essential differences, just who does it more extreme.

But Midnight is completely not this path. It rarely emphasizes narratives like "the strongest anonymity" or "completely untraceable"; instead, it keeps mentioning provable, discloseable, and compliant aspects that sound more "pragmatic".
At first, I thought it seemed to lack the radical feel that the crypto circle should have, and even felt a bit insufficiently "Web3".
But the more I ponder, the more I understand that this might be its core difference.

Because in the real world, what people truly need is often not a chain that is completely invisible and utterly untouched.
Enterprises need to protect data, but at critical times, they also need to prove their compliance; financial institutions need privacy, but at the same time, they need to be explainable and traceable to regulators.
These demands are actually fundamentally in conflict with the logic of traditional privacy chains "hiding to the extreme".

Midnight seems to be making an adaptation in the middle: data is by default not publicly disclosed, but can be disclosed through a proof mechanism only revealing results, without having to expose the entire process and raw data.

So in my view, its positioning is fundamentally not "a stronger privacy chain", but a set of privacy infrastructure that can truly be implemented and used.
This approach may not be the most eye-catching or explosive in the short term, but as long as it can run through the scenarios, it is more likely to go more steadily and last longer.

@MidnightNetwork $NIGHT #night

I tested the offline privacy signature feature of the Midnight mobile wallet for seven consecutive days. The official white paper states clearly: offline signing is entirely offline, private keys never touch the internet, and transaction metadata is encrypted, with a signing speed of under 100 milliseconds. The head of the IOG wallet also mentioned in last week's community AMA that this solution is the most secure mobile offline signing in the industry, specifically addressing the issue of private key leakage online.

I used two test accounts and conducted a total of 42 offline signing tests, covering common scenarios such as transfers, contract interactions, and NFT authorizations. I recorded the time taken, success rates, privacy traces, and DUST consumption, and the actual results were significantly worse than advertised.

In practice, a single offline signature took an average of 860 milliseconds, which is more than eight times the official claim. For slightly more complex contract calls, the signing time directly exceeded 2 seconds. Among the 42 transactions, there were 6 signature verification failures, resulting in a failure rate of 14.3%. Moreover, the failed transactions still deducted 1.8 DUST when put on-chain, leading to a total of 23 invalid consumptions over the seven days.

More seriously, regarding privacy issues, I inspected the transaction packages generated offline, which included plain text with device model, system version, and signing time. It was even possible to associate wallet historical addresses through the signing sequence, making the claims of never touching the internet and zero leakage untenable.

Friends in the wallet security field have also said that this so-called offline signing only means the private key is not online, while device information is fully exposed. Hackers can easily lock onto users through these features, which does not meet acceptable security standards. I also found that offline signing only supports single transactions; batch operations result in errors, and this limitation is completely omitted from the documentation.

Currently, this feature has not achieved even the most basic stability and security. I have already disabled offline signing and reverted to using a hardware wallet for local signing. I hope the official team can properly reconstruct the metadata obfuscation logic in Q2, optimize signing speed, and resolve the issue of failed deductions; otherwise, the narrative around mobile security will indeed be just empty talk. #Midnight $NIGHT
Custody means loss of control, SLA is merely a facade, and the actual costs are three times higher than advertised
@MidnightNetwork $NIGHT #night

Recently, I've been pondering a question:
In the future, as more assets, identities, behaviors, and contract interactions are carried on-chain, can we truly accept that all records are permanently public and visible to everyone?
Many people talk about Web3 saying the more transparency, the better; this statement is only partially true. Transparency can indeed reduce shady operations and make the system more trustworthy. However, once all data is fully exposed without reservation, transparency can become a burden. Ordinary users do not want to expose their financial trails, and institutions certainly cannot fully publicly disclose their business activities. Even in the future, numerous AI entities cannot operate stably in an environment without privacy boundaries.
It is for this reason that I have been continuously paying attention to this.
In my view, what is worth focusing on is not whether the privacy track will become popular again, but whether there are projects that can genuinely integrate seemingly contradictory elements of privacy, verifiability, usability, and compliance into a single underlying architecture. This is also why $NIGHT is worth long-term observation.
If a privacy public chain only remains in the realm of anonymous narratives, its value is actually quite limited. Anonymity is never the end goal; the real key is: can on-chain applications provide real choices for users, developers, and institutions while retaining verifiability—such as which information is public, which is disclosed only within necessary limits, and which logic only needs to prove correct execution without revealing all the hidden cards?
What attracts me to Midnight is not just a simple statement of “protecting privacy,” but the direction it represents:
The future on-chain world should not only have the two extremes of full public and complete hidden; it needs a programmable, verifiable, and self-controlled privacy layer.
If this path is successful, the impact will not just be on a niche track.
On-chain identity, institutional asset interactions, data collaboration between enterprises, and even the on-chain operational environment for AI agents all rely on this capability. The next phase that limits the large-scale implementation of Web3 is often not “can it go on-chain,” but “after going on-chain, can it be both trustworthy and not overly expose information.”
Therefore, I view MidnightNetwork and $NIGHT as looking more at a more foundational matter:
Can it turn “privacy” from a speculative narrative into a truly usable infrastructure capability.
#night @MidnightNetwork $NIGHT

This week, the hottest topic in the Cardano community is definitely Charles Hoskinson's direct halt of the allocation plan for 18 million $NIGHT by Liqwid DAO. On the surface, it seems like a governance dispute, but it fundamentally strikes at the core of all privacy public chains—the challenge of finding a balance between privacy and compliance.

I have always felt that most privacy projects on the market are taking the route of 'completely hiding away,' wishing they could weld all transaction data onto the chain. What’s the result? As soon as regulators reach out, they break down; traditional institutions simply dare not touch them. But Midnight's approach of 'rational privacy' really resonates with me: it’s not about hiding, but about having the right to decide who can see and to what extent, which is the kind of privacy that should exist in the era of compliance.

I specifically delved into its dual ledger design, and honestly, it was quite eye-opening. A common issue with public chains is that gas fees and coin prices are tied together; when the coin price rises, users get squeezed out. Midnight uses $NIGHT to generate DUST as fuel, and DUST cannot be traded; once used, it decays—this means that as long as you have a base position, the on-chain usage cost remains stable, and you don’t have to be anxiously watching gas prices every day. This design is truly unique in the privacy race.

There are certainly controversies; having Google Cloud as an infrastructure partner is a bit delicate for a network that emphasizes decentralization. But if we think from another perspective, if Midnight really wants to penetrate the compliance market of traditional finance, large-scale computing power is an unavoidable hurdle. Charles also mentioned that this is just a hardware layer collaboration, and the protocol layer is still decentralized; let’s tentatively believe half of it.

My strategy is straightforward: the $NIGHT I received from the airdrop, I will hold onto it without selling or increasing my position. When the mainnet launches at the end of March, I will focus on ecosystem projects like Bodega Labs—if it can truly achieve a commercial closed loop of 'privacy + compliance', then Midnight will not be just another air coin, but a public chain that can truly land.

#night #MidnightNetwork @MidnightNetwork $NIGHT

Recently studied Midnight, there is a place that really struck me. It does not simply pursue "hiding everything", but rather accepts reality with clarity: regulation, auditing, dispute resolution, these are unavoidable. It straightforwardly incorporates these real-world constraints into its underlying design.

For ordinary users, privacy is the default state; transaction and business data do not need to be permanently exposed on the chain;
However, when it comes time to explain the situation and cooperate with checks, one can actively disclose and provide verifiable, traceable evidence.

Compared to those purely anonymous chains, this logic is indeed much more practical for teams that genuinely want to create serious applications and engage in long-term business.

So when I look at $NIGHT , it feels more like seeing a foundational infrastructure for future compliant DeFi and institutional-level applications that can truly be implemented, rather than a short-term topic that just rides a wave of hype.
$NIGHT @MidnightNetwork #night

$NIGHT Market Breakdown: The Heat is On, Retail Investors Must Stay Alert

As fellow retail investors, we won't exaggerate or criticize, just focusing on real market data to help everyone avoid emotional traps and unnecessary pitfalls.

In the past 24 hours, $NIGHT has seen a slight increase of 0.43%. The trend appears stable, but in the last 8 hours, it rose from $0.04424 to $0.04495, with a short-term gain of nearly 1.7%. The RSI-6 jumped from 52.5 to 72.5, and the buying sentiment in the market is clearly warming up.

The trading volume performance is even more impressive, maintaining a transaction amount between $560 million and $610 million over the last 24 hours, with a turnover rate exceeding 80% of its market capitalization. Considering its market capitalization ranking around 65, the capital activity is among the top tier of its peer coins.

However, hidden dangers lie beneath the excitement: the capital flow has been negative, reflecting an overall state of net outflow. While the apparent trading volume is booming, there is actually ongoing selling pressure, and the market is far from as optimistic as it seems.

The fundamental data is also worth noting: the current market capitalization is approximately $740 million, with a circulation of 1.66 billion coins and a total supply of 2.4 billion coins, resulting in a circulation rate nearing 69%. The subsequent selling pressure should not be underestimated, a point that is easily overlooked by many.

The positive aspects are also quite clear: there is only one week left until the Midnight Kūkolu federal phase mainnet goes live, and with support from institutional nodes at Google Cloud, market sentiment has been fully stimulated, and the short-term technical indicators also have support. However, whether the market can sustain this momentum depends on the landing effect: the participation of verification nodes and the stability of the mainnet transition. If these two aspects fall short of expectations, the current enthusiasm could quickly fade, and it must be closely monitored.

Lastly, a reminder for everyone: risk signals are already quite evident: the RSI is at a high level, and short-term overheating can easily trigger a pullback; the continuous net outflow of capital indicates that many chips are leaving the market amid good news, showing that not everyone is optimistic about the mainnet narrative.

Combined with the current geopolitical disturbances and amplified liquidity fluctuations, it is easy to be misled by a few bullish candles and blindly chase highs.

Explosive trading volume with capital outflow, mainnet expectations are high but have yet to be validated. Is the current enthusiasm a true value accumulation or a short-term bubble created by the narrative? It is not easy for retail investors to make a profit, so don’t get swept away by emotions; staying alert is the path to longevity.
#night $NIGHT @MidnightNetwork

The Binance homepage is currently hosting two NIGHT events simultaneously: a trading competition and a super earning event, which are two completely different ways to play.

The trading competition is sharing 90 million NIGHT and ends on April 3rd. It's a typical short-term activity with fast in-and-out trades, keeping an eye on the market every day for frequent buying and selling, making a profit and leaving. It's really exciting, and the heart races along with it.

The other super earning event is much more laid-back, with a maximum distribution of 120 million NIGHT quarterly, a total prize pool of 480 million. Just deposit the coins and earn interest, no deadline, lying down quietly, which seems quite "boring".

I directly chose the latter.

In my view, the trading competition is more like a short-term activity for hype and pushing trading volume, it gets lively for a while and then passes. The super earning event, however, is a solid long-term support, using high subsidies to retain participants, clearly recognizing the long-term value of NIGHT.

Some say, why not participate in both? I simply don't have the energy; the trading competition's pace is too fast, constantly monitoring the candlestick charts is too stressful, and the back-and-forth just to boost trading volume is something I can't handle.

I'd rather buy some NIGHT and toss it into the earning event, do what I need to do, and check back after a while to see the extra interest as a surprise.

The super earning event ends on the morning of March 25th, so those who want to be long-term holders still have time.

Although the four-hour chart for NIGHT has already crossed bearish, there are quite a few people looking bearish in the short term, but this non-hustle "boring" holding method is actually easier to withstand market fluctuations.

#night $NIGHT
@MidnightNetwork

I was really amazed by this project: 24 billion $NIGHT , distributed for free throughout the process, no private placement, no public sale, no cutting韭菜 (scamming), those who missed the earlier waves can still make up for it now, the scale is really full.

Last night I flipped through the MidnightNetwork white paper, the more I read, the more I was into it. As an old airdrop enthusiast, I've seen countless airdrops, but few like this one that write fairness, inclusiveness, free, and transparency into the rules.

Let me briefly explain its token distribution logic:
The total amount is 24 billion, all relying on community distribution, no reservations, no exclusive for big holders, all publicly verifiable, code open source, and there is zk privacy technology as a safety net.

The entire distribution is divided into several waves, and missing out is not a problem:

1. Glacier Fall (First Wave)
Historical snapshot: June 11, 2025
Supports BTC, ETH, ADA, SOL, BNB and other major public chains. As long as there are more than $100 worth of native coins in the wallet at that time, you can claim proportionally.
Many people didn't have time to operate at that time, and the official didn't directly swallow it, but instead all flowed into the next round.
​
2. Scavenger Digging (Second Wave)
This wave is friendlier: zero asset threshold.
If you have a computer, can run a node, and contribute a bit of CPU, you can participate, lasting 30 days, purely distributing coins based on computing power; even complete newcomers can get in.
The two waves combined have already claimed about 4.5 billion coins.
​
3. Now: Redemption Period + Lost and Found (Remediation Phase)
Currently in the second round of unfreezing and redeeming, there will be opportunities until December 2026.
Key points:
​
- Those who qualified in the previous snapshot but didn't claim can reclaim part during the lost and found phase.
​
- Claiming ≠ arriving, redemption is what really transfers to your wallet.
​
- Transaction fees are very low, unlocked in batches, will not crash the market.
​
4. Binance users also have automatic benefits
Binance directly helps users who hold qualified assets on the platform during the snapshot period to automatically claim, flexible earning and staking count, there are also additional distributions every quarter, super friendly for ordinary people.

Overall feeling:
This is not just randomly distributing coins; it is genuinely building a community and ecosystem.
First, taking care of old chain users, then giving newcomers opportunities, and finally providing remediation for those who missed out, layer by layer, very few projects can achieve such stability.

If you didn't catch up before, you can still take the remediation channel now, don't wait any longer.
#night @MidnightNetwork $NIGHT

Recently, there has been a rather ironic joke circulating in the circle: there is a project touted as the next generation of full-chain infrastructure, spending money to find channels to boost traffic. As a result, on the day of the token launch, the official post was flooded with Indian English robots, all spamming "Good project sir." The secondary market opened and went completely silent, with no liquidity at all; it was all false data propping up the facade, and a single bearish candle revealed everything. Everyone laughed after seeing this; relying on scripts to create false prosperity in 2026 simply cannot withstand any fluctuations.

Also because of this, I am more optimistic about the **@MidnightNetwork**'s Nightforce ambassador program. It seems slow to watch, but it really understands the community and the long-term logic of the NIGHT token.

The mainnet will be launched soon. Other projects would have already started burning money crazily to buy trending searches and set up KOL matrices to promote, aiming for a short-term hype to fleece investors. But Midnight is doing the opposite, not engaging in quick-money marketing during the mainnet window but instead carefully selecting the third batch of ambassador volunteers. What they want is not the tens of thousands of likes or robot comments generated but real people who can patiently guide newcomers on Discord, hold small offline sharing sessions locally, and explain the difficult concept of "rational privacy" clearly.

Now, with information overflowing, AI-generated copy, and bots flooding the market, the most scarce resource is actually the trust between real people. This is the highest cost and cannot be replaced by machines. Midnight's move is essentially using the cohesion of a real community to hedge against the short-term fluctuations in the token price.

If at the beginning it was all "mercenaries" hired with money, the moment the token price drops, they would scatter; but this selected group of ambassadors with consensus will stabilize the community's fundamental support during market lows, maintaining the real user base of NIGHT.

Applying to be a Nightforce ambassador now is likely not a short-term quick-money gig, but it is definitely the best window to observe closely how a top-tier privacy public chain turns geek technology into a global business consensus. For those who genuinely believe in NIGHT and want to participate in the Cardano ecosystem's privacy track long-term, this opportunity is worth much more than following hot trends and making quick calls.

#night $NIGHT @MidnightNetwork