Binance Square

吉霸猫

Meme Fucker | 相信相信的力量 | 推特:@0x_JBCat
Occasional Trader
5.4 Years
43 Following
153 Followers
277 Liked
3 Shared
Posts
PINNED
·
--
The shorting strategy of @xiaomucrypto, the boss of Chuanmu, for all altcoins is very interesting. Temporarily, I whipped up a script for shorting Binance contracts with AI. Currently, it supports one-click queries for the top 50 cryptocurrencies by market cap, then automatically allocates amounts to place short orders while setting take profit and stop loss. I tested with $1000, allocating an average of $20 to each coin, with 10x leverage for shorting. The script looks fine, and tomorrow I'll find a good price point to open shorts in bulk. Currently, the script is in beta, for testing and learning purposes only. If you lose money using the script, don't come to me for rights protection.🤣 $BTC $ETH $XRP
The shorting strategy of @xiaomucrypto, the boss of Chuanmu, for all altcoins is very interesting. Temporarily, I whipped up a script for shorting Binance contracts with AI.

Currently, it supports one-click queries for the top 50 cryptocurrencies by market cap, then automatically allocates amounts to place short orders while setting take profit and stop loss.

I tested with $1000, allocating an average of $20 to each coin, with 10x leverage for shorting. The script looks fine, and tomorrow I'll find a good price point to open shorts in bulk.

Currently, the script is in beta, for testing and learning purposes only. If you lose money using the script, don't come to me for rights protection.🤣

$BTC $ETH $XRP
·
--
Bullish
The longest record of continuous decline in BTC in history is 6 months, which occurred in 2018, followed by a continuous rise for 5 months. If BTC's monthly line still closes lower this month, it will tie the record for continuous decline, then...🤔 #btc行情 $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT)
The longest record of continuous decline in BTC in history is 6 months, which occurred in 2018, followed by a continuous rise for 5 months. If BTC's monthly line still closes lower this month, it will tie the record for continuous decline, then...🤔

#btc行情 $BTC
Have you noticed? Now we are in a ridiculously prosperous era of the internet, and as long as you can think a little, you won't starve to death. Engaging in e-commerce, creating content, selling through short videos, working in private domains, or even flipping some information disparities can all make a good amount of money. Yet so many people insist on attending that inhumane class. Waking up early, commuting, clocking in, and working a prison-like job, selling their lives for a wage that barely sustains them. Many people are not unaware of other paths; they are just afraid to take them. Why are they afraid? I pondered for a long time and later realized—it’s because they’ve been conditioned since childhood. As a child, my family would say: study hard, get into a good university, and find a stable job. At school, teachers taught standardized answers, not independent thinking. If you obey, follow the rules, and don’t make mistakes, you are a good student. Once you enter a company, what the boss wants is execution, not creativity. If you follow the process and don’t make mistakes, you are a good employee. After ten or twenty years, a person becomes a well-trained machine. You become accustomed to being told what to do, following procedures, and staying within your comfort zone. Then one day, you are asked to make decisions for yourself, bear risks, and handle uncertainty— and you can’t do it. What you fear is not exhaustion, but the possibility of failure, and losing even the excuse of “I’ve tried my best.” At least at work, you can comfort yourself: “It’s not that I can’t do it; it’s the environment that’s bad.” This is like boiling a frog in warm water. The water is heated gradually, and by the time you realize it’s hot, you can’t jump out anymore. So you will see an absurd reality: many people would rather be slowly squeezed by the system than make a true decision for their own lives. To say something particularly clichéd, but very heartfelt: what’s inhumane is not making money, but handing your whole life over to someone else to arrange. The internet age offers ordinary people not guarantees, but opportunities. But opportunities only reward two kinds of people: those who dare to try and those who have no way out. And most people are stuck in the middle—neither at a dead end nor daring to break the situation. The key to breaking the situation is just one: realize that you have been conditioned, and then start little by little to nurture yourself back. {future}(BTCUSDT)
Have you noticed?

Now we are in a ridiculously prosperous era of the internet, and as long as you can think a little, you won't starve to death.

Engaging in e-commerce, creating content, selling through short videos, working in private domains, or even flipping some information disparities can all make a good amount of money.

Yet so many people insist on attending that inhumane class. Waking up early, commuting, clocking in, and working a prison-like job, selling their lives for a wage that barely sustains them.

Many people are not unaware of other paths; they are just afraid to take them.

Why are they afraid?

I pondered for a long time and later realized—it’s because they’ve been conditioned since childhood.

As a child, my family would say: study hard, get into a good university, and find a stable job.

At school, teachers taught standardized answers, not independent thinking. If you obey, follow the rules, and don’t make mistakes, you are a good student.

Once you enter a company, what the boss wants is execution, not creativity. If you follow the process and don’t make mistakes, you are a good employee.

After ten or twenty years, a person becomes a well-trained machine. You become accustomed to being told what to do, following procedures, and staying within your comfort zone.

Then one day, you are asked to make decisions for yourself, bear risks, and handle uncertainty— and you can’t do it.

What you fear is not exhaustion, but the possibility of failure, and losing even the excuse of “I’ve tried my best.”

At least at work, you can comfort yourself: “It’s not that I can’t do it; it’s the environment that’s bad.”

This is like boiling a frog in warm water. The water is heated gradually, and by the time you realize it’s hot, you can’t jump out anymore.

So you will see an absurd reality: many people would rather be slowly squeezed by the system than make a true decision for their own lives.

To say something particularly clichéd, but very heartfelt: what’s inhumane is not making money, but handing your whole life over to someone else to arrange.

The internet age offers ordinary people not guarantees, but opportunities.

But opportunities only reward two kinds of people: those who dare to try and those who have no way out.

And most people are stuck in the middle—neither at a dead end nor daring to break the situation.

The key to breaking the situation is just one: realize that you have been conditioned, and then start little by little to nurture yourself back.
·
--
Bullish
Morgan Stanley has just made a move. This super bank, managing $60 trillion in assets, has submitted an application for a spot ETF $BTC to the SEC. Here comes the key point: this is not a trial run but a direct push for the 'lowest market fee rate', charging only 0.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points lower than Grayscale's mini trust, let alone those traditional players charging over 0.25%. To be honest, this signal is extremely important. Firstly, this will be the first spot Bitcoin ETF issued by a commercial bank. Morgan Stanley has 16,000 advisors, who are the real 'gatekeepers of wealth'. Who do they serve? The Baby Boomers, the affluent class who hold substantial assets but have remained cautious about cryptocurrencies. Previously, there was no legitimate compliance channel for this money to enter the crypto space, but now the bank has opened a direct pathway for you. Secondly, with the fee reduced to 0.14%, this is not just a simple price war; it is setting a new benchmark for the entire industry. The lower the fee, the lower the holding cost for the general public, and institutions have less psychological burden when recommending to clients. When clients ask, 'How much do you charge for this?', advisors can confidently say, 'It's cheaper than buying a money market fund.' This breakthrough in psychological barriers is more effective than any KOL's shout-out. Thirdly, it is expected to see an official launch within two weeks, and the timing is very precise. So the question arises, what does this mean for us? #btc行情 $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT)
Morgan Stanley has just made a move.

This super bank, managing $60 trillion in assets, has submitted an application for a spot ETF $BTC to the SEC. Here comes the key point: this is not a trial run but a direct push for the 'lowest market fee rate', charging only 0.14%, which is 0.01 percentage points lower than Grayscale's mini trust, let alone those traditional players charging over 0.25%.

To be honest, this signal is extremely important.

Firstly, this will be the first spot Bitcoin ETF issued by a commercial bank. Morgan Stanley has 16,000 advisors, who are the real 'gatekeepers of wealth'. Who do they serve? The Baby Boomers, the affluent class who hold substantial assets but have remained cautious about cryptocurrencies. Previously, there was no legitimate compliance channel for this money to enter the crypto space, but now the bank has opened a direct pathway for you.

Secondly, with the fee reduced to 0.14%, this is not just a simple price war; it is setting a new benchmark for the entire industry. The lower the fee, the lower the holding cost for the general public, and institutions have less psychological burden when recommending to clients. When clients ask, 'How much do you charge for this?', advisors can confidently say, 'It's cheaper than buying a money market fund.' This breakthrough in psychological barriers is more effective than any KOL's shout-out.

Thirdly, it is expected to see an official launch within two weeks, and the timing is very precise.
So the question arises, what does this mean for us?

#btc行情 $BTC
·
--
Bullish
Always bullish, always teary-eyed 🥹 According to the latest report from Cointelegraph, amid increasing global uncertainty, whale investors have swept up 61,000 BTC in just one month. Note that it was a single purchase of 61,000, not a small test position; it was a strategic increase with real money. Even more exciting news is ahead! On-chain data shows that a whale who previously shorted 255 BTC has flipped to long. They also opened a 40x leverage long position of 439.92 BTC, with total positions exceeding 30 million USD. At the same time, this person has also increased their long position in Brent crude oil, currently holding over 25 million USD in oil positions. What signal does this move send? It's not just a simple bullish outlook on BTC; it's a hedge against macro risks while going long on global safe-haven assets. The dual strategy of oil + BTC is very clear: either global inflation expectations are making a comeback, or there is a significant shift in monetary policy from various central banks. Institutional investors are already voting with their feet. To be honest, converting 61,000 BTC amounts to over 4 billion USD; this level of buying power cannot be sustained by retail investors. Only those managing billions or even hundreds of billions in assets, such as institutional investors or family offices, can achieve this scale. What does their collective action signify? It indicates that, in an increasingly uncertain global financial system, large funds need to find a value anchor that is not tied to the traditional system. The attributes of BTC naturally fit this demand. {future}(BTCUSDT) #btc行情 $BTC
Always bullish, always teary-eyed 🥹

According to the latest report from Cointelegraph, amid increasing global uncertainty, whale investors have swept up 61,000 BTC in just one month. Note that it was a single purchase of 61,000, not a small test position; it was a strategic increase with real money.

Even more exciting news is ahead!

On-chain data shows that a whale who previously shorted 255 BTC has flipped to long. They also opened a 40x leverage long position of 439.92 BTC, with total positions exceeding 30 million USD. At the same time, this person has also increased their long position in Brent crude oil, currently holding over 25 million USD in oil positions.

What signal does this move send?
It's not just a simple bullish outlook on BTC; it's a hedge against macro risks while going long on global safe-haven assets. The dual strategy of oil + BTC is very clear: either global inflation expectations are making a comeback, or there is a significant shift in monetary policy from various central banks. Institutional investors are already voting with their feet.

To be honest, converting 61,000 BTC amounts to over 4 billion USD; this level of buying power cannot be sustained by retail investors. Only those managing billions or even hundreds of billions in assets, such as institutional investors or family offices, can achieve this scale.

What does their collective action signify?

It indicates that, in an increasingly uncertain global financial system, large funds need to find a value anchor that is not tied to the traditional system. The attributes of BTC naturally fit this demand.

#btc行情 $BTC
Trump's recent actions are really hard to understand. Just before, he was shouting that America needs to make Iran's "most terrifying nightmare" come true, threatening ground invasion, and then he directly announced a pause on strikes against energy facilities until April 6, saying he gave 10 days instead of the 7 days that Iran wanted. What is this strategy? Extreme stretching? Or is it really as the mediating officials said, that he is confident Iran will surrender, which is why he is willing to give this window period? To be honest, I’m a bit confused too. But one thing is certain: the previous wave of optimism in the market has basically been digested. Business Insider published an article today with a very direct title: Trump's optimism about the agreement to end the Iran war has faded, leading to a drop in the stock market and a surge in oil prices. What does this mean? It means that capital has started to vote with its feet. Everyone previously bet on smooth negotiations and reduced risks, and now that logic has been thrown into question. Just think about it, Trump himself reiterated that Iran's navy and communication systems have already been "destroyed". This statement does not look like a gesture of goodwill at all; it seems more like laying out the cards before negotiations: I have already crippled you, now let’s talk about a good price. So the current situation is: Iran is voluntarily softening and asking for a pause, and the U.S. is giving a step down in response, but both sides are testing each other's bottom lines. What will happen in 10 days? Continue negotiations? Or a new round of more intense strikes? What the market fears most now is not the strikes, but this uncertainty hanging in the air. #特朗普希望尽快结束对伊朗战争 $BTC $ETH $XAU {future}(BTCUSDT)
Trump's recent actions are really hard to understand.

Just before, he was shouting that America needs to make Iran's "most terrifying nightmare" come true, threatening ground invasion, and then he directly announced a pause on strikes against energy facilities until April 6, saying he gave 10 days instead of the 7 days that Iran wanted. What is this strategy? Extreme stretching? Or is it really as the mediating officials said, that he is confident Iran will surrender, which is why he is willing to give this window period?

To be honest, I’m a bit confused too.

But one thing is certain: the previous wave of optimism in the market has basically been digested.

Business Insider published an article today with a very direct title: Trump's optimism about the agreement to end the Iran war has faded, leading to a drop in the stock market and a surge in oil prices. What does this mean? It means that capital has started to vote with its feet. Everyone previously bet on smooth negotiations and reduced risks, and now that logic has been thrown into question.

Just think about it, Trump himself reiterated that Iran's navy and communication systems have already been "destroyed". This statement does not look like a gesture of goodwill at all; it seems more like laying out the cards before negotiations: I have already crippled you, now let’s talk about a good price.

So the current situation is:
Iran is voluntarily softening and asking for a pause, and the U.S. is giving a step down in response, but both sides are testing each other's bottom lines. What will happen in 10 days? Continue negotiations? Or a new round of more intense strikes?
What the market fears most now is not the strikes, but this uncertainty hanging in the air.

#特朗普希望尽快结束对伊朗战争 $BTC $ETH $XAU
Why Am I Still Watching SIGN After the PlungeTo be honest, I've been keeping an eye on $SIGN recently, and I've been feeling quite reflective. Back in early March, there was a surge of nearly three times in half a month, and when it hit $0.052, my social circle was flooded with messages talking about it being a geopolitical risk hedge and a digital safe haven, which I found quite exciting. And what’s the result? Now the sentiment is cooling down faster than cold water poured in winter. Brothers, you might say this is not dead, but let me tell you, what you see is just the candlestick chart, while what I see is the logic. First, let's talk about the overall environment. The market is currently leaning towards risk-off, with low trading volume for Bitcoin and altcoins at multi-month lows, with funds prioritizing a return to BTC or leading coins. Small-cap altcoins are under obvious pressure, and this is not just a problem for $SIGN, but for the entire ecosystem which is contracting. In the short term, the speculative bubble has burst, and big players are starting to sell off, cashing in profits and causing a market crash. This kind of chain reaction is unavoidable for anyone.

Why Am I Still Watching SIGN After the Plunge

To be honest, I've been keeping an eye on $SIGN recently, and I've been feeling quite reflective. Back in early March, there was a surge of nearly three times in half a month, and when it hit $0.052, my social circle was flooded with messages talking about it being a geopolitical risk hedge and a digital safe haven, which I found quite exciting.
And what’s the result? Now the sentiment is cooling down faster than cold water poured in winter.

Brothers, you might say this is not dead, but let me tell you, what you see is just the candlestick chart, while what I see is the logic.
First, let's talk about the overall environment. The market is currently leaning towards risk-off, with low trading volume for Bitcoin and altcoins at multi-month lows, with funds prioritizing a return to BTC or leading coins. Small-cap altcoins are under obvious pressure, and this is not just a problem for $SIGN , but for the entire ecosystem which is contracting. In the short term, the speculative bubble has burst, and big players are starting to sell off, cashing in profits and causing a market crash. This kind of chain reaction is unavoidable for anyone.
·
--
Bullish
This time is really different Last night, Franklin Templeton announced a collaboration with Ondo Finance to directly tokenize five ETFs and place them in a crypto wallet for you to buy and sell anytime, 24/7. You heard that right, one of the world's most conservative asset management giants has started running its business on the crypto track. What does this mean? Before, to buy ETFs you had to find a broker to open an account, and you had to wait for market hours to trade. Now, with a crypto wallet and a mobile phone, you can buy anytime, anywhere in the world, 24/7. Franklin Templeton has a big appetite, with the first batch covering Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and Latin America. As for the U.S., we have to wait for regulatory clarity, but looking at the current trends, this day may come sooner than most people think. There’s more than just this signal; on the same day, the NYSE listed Morgan Stanley's spot Bitcoin ETF, and the launch of Morgan Stanley's ETF is getting closer. Additionally, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins revealed that a tokenization innovation exemption may be issued in the coming weeks, and the boundaries between traditional finance and the crypto world are dissolving at a visible speed. To be honest, we used to say "the institutions are coming" for many years, and this time they really are coming. It's not some small pilot project; it's players like Franklin Templeton and Morgan Stanley of this caliber, investing real money. They are not here to speculate; they are here to build infrastructure. So the question arises, what is Ethereum doing now? #etf $BTC $ETH {future}(BTCUSDT)
This time is really different

Last night, Franklin Templeton announced a collaboration with Ondo Finance to directly tokenize five ETFs and place them in a crypto wallet for you to buy and sell anytime, 24/7. You heard that right, one of the world's most conservative asset management giants has started running its business on the crypto track.

What does this mean? Before, to buy ETFs you had to find a broker to open an account, and you had to wait for market hours to trade. Now, with a crypto wallet and a mobile phone, you can buy anytime, anywhere in the world, 24/7.

Franklin Templeton has a big appetite, with the first batch covering Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and Latin America. As for the U.S., we have to wait for regulatory clarity, but looking at the current trends, this day may come sooner than most people think.

There’s more than just this signal; on the same day, the NYSE listed Morgan Stanley's spot Bitcoin ETF, and the launch of Morgan Stanley's ETF is getting closer. Additionally, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins revealed that a tokenization innovation exemption may be issued in the coming weeks, and the boundaries between traditional finance and the crypto world are dissolving at a visible speed.

To be honest, we used to say "the institutions are coming" for many years, and this time they really are coming. It's not some small pilot project; it's players like Franklin Templeton and Morgan Stanley of this caliber, investing real money. They are not here to speculate; they are here to build infrastructure.

So the question arises, what is Ethereum doing now?
#etf $BTC $ETH
Binance has recently fully launched the AI Pro feature, allowing direct participation in AI trading through the AI sub-account. The overall experience threshold is actually quite low, and it takes about ten minutes to get started. Currently, the monthly subscription of 9.99U has already been sold out. Actually, I had a judgment before, that teams like Huansquare can produce models at the deepseek level, while Binance has a data volume of 300 million registered users and millions of real trading users during a bull market. The trading density and quality of behavioral data are on a completely different level compared to products like Revolut and Robinhood. A financial application that can be considered top-tier in human history, if it really starts using this data to train models, the results that come out will be highly anticipated! #币安AI $BTC $ETH
Binance has recently fully launched the AI Pro feature, allowing direct participation in AI trading through the AI sub-account. The overall experience threshold is actually quite low, and it takes about ten minutes to get started. Currently, the monthly subscription of 9.99U has already been sold out.

Actually, I had a judgment before, that teams like Huansquare can produce models at the deepseek level, while Binance has a data volume of 300 million registered users and millions of real trading users during a bull market. The trading density and quality of behavioral data are on a completely different level compared to products like Revolut and Robinhood.

A financial application that can be considered top-tier in human history, if it really starts using this data to train models, the results that come out will be highly anticipated!
#币安AI $BTC $ETH
To be honest, the performance of oil prices in the past few days has left me a bit confused. I originally thought it was just a normal correction, but today it crashed directly. After flipping through the news, I found that things are not that simple. First, there was news from the United States that the war in Iran might come to an end, which ignited the first wave. But what really alerted me was another set of data: Reuters calculated that at least 40% of Russia's oil export capacity has been suspended. Ukrainian drones reportedly also blew up the oil facilities at Russia's Ust-Luga port, and the specific losses are still being assessed. Meanwhile, the situation in Iraq is even more dramatic. Production in the southern oil fields has plummeted by about 80%, now only around 800,000 barrels per day. According to three Iraqi energy officials, the storage facilities are already full, and due to conflicts in the Strait of Hormuz, exports have been blocked, forcing them to cut production. They even said that if the blockade continues, further reductions may be necessary. International giants like BP and Eni have been asked by the Iraqi government to significantly cut production. The current situation is that both major supply lines in the Middle East and Russia are having issues simultaneously, which should normally lead to a surge in oil prices. However, the market is trading on the expectation that "the U.S. ends the war in Iran → global supply returns → oil prices decline." BlackRock's CEO had previously warned that if oil prices rise to $150, it could trigger a global economic recession. Now this logic has reversed; the plunge in oil prices seems to be good news, and the European and American stock markets are soaring today. I think oil prices may still fluctuate in the short term, after all, geopolitical factors are highly unpredictable. #国际油价下跌 $BTC $XAU $XAG
To be honest, the performance of oil prices in the past few days has left me a bit confused.
I originally thought it was just a normal correction, but today it crashed directly. After flipping through the news, I found that things are not that simple.

First, there was news from the United States that the war in Iran might come to an end, which ignited the first wave. But what really alerted me was another set of data: Reuters calculated that at least 40% of Russia's oil export capacity has been suspended. Ukrainian drones reportedly also blew up the oil facilities at Russia's Ust-Luga port, and the specific losses are still being assessed.

Meanwhile, the situation in Iraq is even more dramatic. Production in the southern oil fields has plummeted by about 80%, now only around 800,000 barrels per day. According to three Iraqi energy officials, the storage facilities are already full, and due to conflicts in the Strait of Hormuz, exports have been blocked, forcing them to cut production. They even said that if the blockade continues, further reductions may be necessary.

International giants like BP and Eni have been asked by the Iraqi government to significantly cut production.
The current situation is that both major supply lines in the Middle East and Russia are having issues simultaneously, which should normally lead to a surge in oil prices.

However, the market is trading on the expectation that "the U.S. ends the war in Iran → global supply returns → oil prices decline."

BlackRock's CEO had previously warned that if oil prices rise to $150, it could trigger a global economic recession. Now this logic has reversed; the plunge in oil prices seems to be good news, and the European and American stock markets are soaring today.

I think oil prices may still fluctuate in the short term, after all, geopolitical factors are highly unpredictable.

#国际油价下跌 $BTC $XAU $XAG
What people hate are not the market makers who cause violent ups and downs, but the market makers who only cause declines without any increases. For most cryptocurrencies, as long as you can pull off a few times in your lifetime, the market can actually forgive you for going with the flow at other times, after all, you have given everyone a chance. However, some projects just keep going down without looking back, as if they have never seen money, rushing to sell coins to make up for their losses, and in the end, they blame the market makers. Some market makers are truly wronged, and some are genuinely bad. The wronged part is when it was originally agreed with the project party to share the proceeds from the sale in proportion. Otherwise, where did the market maker's coins come from? This is a collusion between the project party and unscrupulous market makers. Since they shared the profits, they deserve to take the blame. But the bad part, I have heard of several cases in recent years. Naive project parties without much experience were deceived by market makers into sending over coins. As a result, the opening price continuously dropped, and some even faced a complete collapse. The market makers sold all the coins at a high price without spending a dime, and then bought them back at a low price to return to the project party. These project parties are afraid to defend their rights, fearing they will be implicated. After all, seeking active market makers is legally questionable, and such market makers likely do not have any company entity. You wouldn't even know whom to approach for your rights; you can only swallow your grievances. Currently, because the vast majority of market makers with recognizable names, whether it's Wintermute, GSR, Amber, or even DWF, their market-making business is all about executing orders properly. At the upcoming Hong Kong conference, there will definitely be a large number of people who appear from nowhere, talking confidently at dinner parties, claiming to be market makers for River. You will also see a group of beautiful ladies going to various booths handing out business cards listing a bunch of impressive projects they have managed. Out in the world, their identity is self-assigned, because passive market makers cannot have any brand, making it impossible to verify. If you believe them, and you give them your coins, that’s the end of it. Binance today specifically released a guideline for warning about market maker risk behaviors, exposing several common malicious acts. It was explained very clearly, and they published a report email audit@binance.com, implementing a blacklist system for violating market makers. Let’s see if they can publish a batch of malicious manipulators as they did with the previous coin listing agents.
What people hate are not the market makers who cause violent ups and downs, but the market makers who only cause declines without any increases. For most cryptocurrencies, as long as you can pull off a few times in your lifetime, the market can actually forgive you for going with the flow at other times, after all, you have given everyone a chance. However, some projects just keep going down without looking back, as if they have never seen money, rushing to sell coins to make up for their losses, and in the end, they blame the market makers. Some market makers are truly wronged, and some are genuinely bad.

The wronged part is when it was originally agreed with the project party to share the proceeds from the sale in proportion. Otherwise, where did the market maker's coins come from? This is a collusion between the project party and unscrupulous market makers. Since they shared the profits, they deserve to take the blame.

But the bad part, I have heard of several cases in recent years. Naive project parties without much experience were deceived by market makers into sending over coins. As a result, the opening price continuously dropped, and some even faced a complete collapse. The market makers sold all the coins at a high price without spending a dime, and then bought them back at a low price to return to the project party.

These project parties are afraid to defend their rights, fearing they will be implicated. After all, seeking active market makers is legally questionable, and such market makers likely do not have any company entity. You wouldn't even know whom to approach for your rights; you can only swallow your grievances.

Currently, because the vast majority of market makers with recognizable names, whether it's Wintermute, GSR, Amber, or even DWF, their market-making business is all about executing orders properly.

At the upcoming Hong Kong conference, there will definitely be a large number of people who appear from nowhere, talking confidently at dinner parties, claiming to be market makers for River. You will also see a group of beautiful ladies going to various booths handing out business cards listing a bunch of impressive projects they have managed. Out in the world, their identity is self-assigned, because passive market makers cannot have any brand, making it impossible to verify. If you believe them, and you give them your coins, that’s the end of it.

Binance today specifically released a guideline for warning about market maker risk behaviors, exposing several common malicious acts. It was explained very clearly, and they published a report email audit@binance.com, implementing a blacklist system for violating market makers. Let’s see if they can publish a batch of malicious manipulators as they did with the previous coin listing agents.
·
--
Bullish
I saw a tweet listing the things that countries prohibit and encourage. It has been widely shared. The prohibitions state: circumventing the Great Firewall, investing in U.S. stocks, buying $BTC , freely exchanging currency... The encouragements include: buying property, having children, investing in A-shares... The comments section is very lively, but I want to discuss from another angle. I am someone who trades U.S. stocks, engages in crypto, and works on AI automation. According to this classification, everything I do falls into the prohibited category. But interestingly, these prohibited activities happen to be the asset classes with the highest returns over the past five years. The S&P 500 in the U.S. has risen about 80% over the past five years. BTC has experienced two bull and bear cycles from the beginning of 2021 until now, multiplying several times. I don't want to engage in political discussions, nor do I encourage anyone to break the law. What I want to say is something more fundamental: information asymmetry determines asset disparity. When a person's sources of information are confined to a single ecosystem, their investment choices are limited. When investment choices are restricted, the path to wealth growth is also constrained. This is why I have been creating content on cross-border investments—not because the moon outside is rounder, but because having one more dimension of information and choices reduces your risks. If you put all your money in one market, one currency, one jurisdiction, you are essentially all in on a single asset. {future}(BTCUSDT)
I saw a tweet listing the things that countries prohibit and encourage. It has been widely shared.

The prohibitions state: circumventing the Great Firewall, investing in U.S. stocks, buying $BTC , freely exchanging currency...
The encouragements include: buying property, having children, investing in A-shares...

The comments section is very lively, but I want to discuss from another angle.

I am someone who trades U.S. stocks, engages in crypto, and works on AI automation. According to this classification, everything I do falls into the prohibited category.

But interestingly, these prohibited activities happen to be the asset classes with the highest returns over the past five years.

The S&P 500 in the U.S. has risen about 80% over the past five years. BTC has experienced two bull and bear cycles from the beginning of 2021 until now, multiplying several times.

I don't want to engage in political discussions, nor do I encourage anyone to break the law.

What I want to say is something more fundamental: information asymmetry determines asset disparity.

When a person's sources of information are confined to a single ecosystem, their investment choices are limited. When investment choices are restricted, the path to wealth growth is also constrained.

This is why I have been creating content on cross-border investments—not because the moon outside is rounder, but because having one more dimension of information and choices reduces your risks.

If you put all your money in one market, one currency, one jurisdiction, you are essentially all in on a single asset.
Confirm the ceasefire! Trump just tweeted on his own platform saying, I am pleased to inform everyone that the United States and Iran have had comprehensive and effective dialogue over the past two days. Therefore, he instructed the U.S. Department of Defense to delay the strikes on Iran's core facilities by five days. $BTC
Confirm the ceasefire! Trump just tweeted on his own platform saying, I am pleased to inform everyone that the United States and Iran have had comprehensive and effective dialogue over the past two days.

Therefore, he instructed the U.S. Department of Defense to delay the strikes on Iran's core facilities by five days.
$BTC
Gold $XAU and other precious metals are about to erase all the gains of this year. It's unclear how many people were trapped at this peak, especially those who decided to buy gold as a safe-haven asset after the war began. As the fighting intensified, gold actually dropped more sharply.

On the other hand, several cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance and Aster, have also supported various precious metal contracts, further lowering the market entry threshold. {future}(XAUUSDT)
Gold $XAU and other precious metals are about to erase all the gains of this year. It's unclear how many people were trapped at this peak, especially those who decided to buy gold as a safe-haven asset after the war began. As the fighting intensified, gold actually dropped more sharply.

On the other hand, several cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance and Aster, have also supported various precious metal contracts, further lowering the market entry threshold.
Bear Market Law: Stablecoin De-pegging Resolv attackers are still maliciously inflating US What happened: 1) Attackers exploited the infinite minting/super issuance bug in the contract, currently spending 200,000 USDC to mint 80 million USR. 2) They then converted the over-minted USR into wstUSR → mass selling through Curve / AMM pools → USR supply skyrocketed, directly breaking the peg, causing the price to plummet by 74% in an instant. 3) Attackers have partially cashed out, withdrawing several million dollars in ETH. Resolv @ResolvLabs 's USR is designed with Delta Neutral + ETH/BTC over-collateralization + RLP insurance layer, which originally had decent de-pegging resistance, but the minting logic lacks strict collateral verification and amount cap checks, allowing attackers to mint infinitely at a very low cost. This contract passed formal audit in August 2025, yet still had issues—showing that DeFi audits ≠ 100% security. Moreover, the amount of super issuance this time was too large, directly impacting the liquidity pools, exposing vaults like USR/RLP/stUSR. If you hold USR, wstUSR, USR-DOLA LP, or related yield positions, withdraw if you can, and minimize your losses as soon as possible! Currently, the contract has not paused minting, so don’t think about buying cheap USR for the attackers to take over! #稳定币
Bear Market Law: Stablecoin De-pegging

Resolv attackers are still maliciously inflating US

What happened:

1) Attackers exploited the infinite minting/super issuance bug in the contract, currently spending 200,000 USDC to mint 80 million USR.

2) They then converted the over-minted USR into wstUSR → mass selling through Curve / AMM pools → USR supply skyrocketed, directly breaking the peg, causing the price to plummet by 74% in an instant.

3) Attackers have partially cashed out, withdrawing several million dollars in ETH.

Resolv @Resolv Labs 's USR is designed with Delta Neutral + ETH/BTC over-collateralization + RLP insurance layer, which originally had decent de-pegging resistance, but the minting logic lacks strict collateral verification and amount cap checks, allowing attackers to mint infinitely at a very low cost.

This contract passed formal audit in August 2025, yet still had issues—showing that DeFi audits ≠ 100% security.

Moreover, the amount of super issuance this time was too large, directly impacting the liquidity pools, exposing vaults like USR/RLP/stUSR.

If you hold USR, wstUSR, USR-DOLA LP, or related yield positions, withdraw if you can, and minimize your losses as soon as possible!

Currently, the contract has not paused minting, so don’t think about buying cheap USR for the attackers to take over!
#稳定币
Is earning money difficult? Many people actually aren't unable to earn; they haven't even started. I used to think making money was particularly hard. Later I realized that those who say it's "difficult" are usually repeating three things: sitting anxiously, scrolling through their phones learning a bunch of useless stuff, and making lots of plans without taking action. The real way to make money is quite simple: talk to people, figure out where they're stuck; solve the problems; organize the methods into services/products; and then charge for it. You don't need to wait until you're "ready"; take the first step first. Your emotions will slowly catch up, but actions won't.
Is earning money difficult? Many people actually aren't unable to earn; they haven't even started.

I used to think making money was particularly hard. Later I realized that those who say it's "difficult" are usually repeating three things: sitting anxiously, scrolling through their phones learning a bunch of useless stuff, and making lots of plans without taking action.

The real way to make money is quite simple: talk to people, figure out where they're stuck; solve the problems; organize the methods into services/products; and then charge for it.

You don't need to wait until you're "ready"; take the first step first. Your emotions will slowly catch up, but actions won't.
It seems that some friends still don't understand what's going on. In simple terms, it should be that the attacker controlled a large number of $THE , and then exploited the loophole that allowed the collateralization of $THE to borrow hard currency using @VenusProtocol , causing a massive spike of $THE in the market. Anyway, there isn't much liquidity, so a little money can go a long way. Venus's oracle reads on-chain, and instantly the THE he put in became very valuable, so he crazily borrowed assets like BTC, Cake, and BNB. Then he dumped THE, which led to his insolvency, but it didn't matter; he had already exchanged garbage for real money. This loss can only be directly absorbed by Venus as a bad debt, while the system slowly sells THE for liquidation. {future}(THEUSDT)
It seems that some friends still don't understand what's going on.

In simple terms, it should be that the attacker controlled a large number of $THE , and then exploited the loophole that allowed the collateralization of $THE to borrow hard currency using @VenusProtocol , causing a massive spike of $THE in the market. Anyway, there isn't much liquidity, so a little money can go a long way.

Venus's oracle reads on-chain, and instantly the THE he put in became very valuable, so he crazily borrowed assets like BTC, Cake, and BNB.

Then he dumped THE, which led to his insolvency, but it didn't matter; he had already exchanged garbage for real money.

This loss can only be directly absorbed by Venus as a bad debt, while the system slowly sells THE for liquidation.
Lobster Wars: A New Arms Race for Exchanges or a Change in Trading Paradigms?The lobster is really hot right now. Binance is doing it, OKX is doing it, Bitget is also doing it, and even some local governments in China have started discussing this direction. To be honest, this kind of atmosphere easily creates a strange anxiety in people: On one hand, AI seems to be able to do everything, but on the other hand, it doesn't know what it should actually do. So whenever something new comes out in the market, everyone's first reaction is to experience it and then talk about it. Recently, Binance and OKX successively launched the DEX side's 'lobster', while Bitget directly launched the CEX version of MCP. I also went to experience Bitget MCP right away and will share a few impressions.

Lobster Wars: A New Arms Race for Exchanges or a Change in Trading Paradigms?

The lobster is really hot right now.
Binance is doing it, OKX is doing it, Bitget is also doing it, and even some local governments in China have started discussing this direction.
To be honest, this kind of atmosphere easily creates a strange anxiety in people:
On one hand, AI seems to be able to do everything, but on the other hand, it doesn't know what it should actually do. So whenever something new comes out in the market, everyone's first reaction is to experience it and then talk about it.
Recently, Binance and OKX successively launched the DEX side's 'lobster', while Bitget directly launched the CEX version of MCP. I also went to experience Bitget MCP right away and will share a few impressions.
In this life, actually everyone has only one main task: Find a dwelling place that will not easily lose heat, steadily obtain about 2000 kcal of energy every day, and then live safely. Everything else: career, wealth, ideals, fame, emotions, desires, in a sense, are just side quests that you choose to embark on. Only those who have truly witnessed war, famine, and turmoil will understand how difficult it is to complete this main task. Peace and stability are never taken for granted. #AI
In this life, actually everyone has only one main task:
Find a dwelling place that will not easily lose heat, steadily obtain about 2000 kcal of energy every day, and then live safely.
Everything else: career, wealth, ideals, fame, emotions, desires, in a sense, are just side quests that you choose to embark on.
Only those who have truly witnessed war, famine, and turmoil will understand how difficult it is to complete this main task. Peace and stability are never taken for granted.
#AI
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs