韭幣爸
幣圈一天人間十年
價格不變，倉位不見
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
4.3 Years
8 Following
89 Followers
77 Liked
7 Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
PINNED
EcoClaw (Energy-Saving Lobster) — Low-Cost Quantitative Co-Driver with Built-in Risk Control and Self-Evolution
🦞 Project Proposal:
In response to Binance's 'Build the Future of Crypto AI' challenge, I share my OpenClaw real-world project: EcoClaw.
Many people give up on AI agents within a few days due to API Tokens being 'too expensive' or 'placing random orders'.
My EcoClaw addresses these two major pain points: reducing costs through a minimalistic structure and ensuring trading discipline through strict SOPs.
🧠 Part One: The Cost-Saving Logic Underlying EcoClaw
To ensure AI survives long-term on Binance, it’s not about telling it what to do, but rather limiting what it 'should not do':
Reject invalid visual consumption: Do not let OpenClaw 'see' screenshots for technical analysis, fully switch to Binance API for data retrieval.
In response to Binance's 'Build the Future of Crypto AI' challenge, I share my OpenClaw real-world project: EcoClaw.
Many people give up on AI agents within a few days due to API Tokens being 'too expensive' or 'placing random orders'.
My EcoClaw addresses these two major pain points: reducing costs through a minimalistic structure and ensuring trading discipline through strict SOPs.
🧠 Part One: The Cost-Saving Logic Underlying EcoClaw
To ensure AI survives long-term on Binance, it’s not about telling it what to do, but rather limiting what it 'should not do':
Reject invalid visual consumption: Do not let OpenClaw 'see' screenshots for technical analysis, fully switch to Binance API for data retrieval.
The final piece of the US stock tokenization puzzle 🧩: Binance's liquidity monster will strike traditional brokerages hard
Today, Binance officially launched the tokenized contracts of $GOOGL , $NVDA , and $META ! This means that in the great landscape of the US stock "Magnificent 7," only MSFT and AAPL are yet to be in place.
To say the least, the liquidity that Binance has shown in the US stock RWA (real-world assets) sector has become so strong that it cannot be ignored.
📊 Let's take the CRCL that I often shared before as an example to see the data comparison:
On-chain explosive power: Its spot Alpha trading volume can easily soar to hundreds of millions of dollars.
Traditional market comparison: The average trading volume in traditional stock markets is only 11 million shares, equivalent to about 1.1 billion dollars.
To say the least, the liquidity that Binance has shown in the US stock RWA (real-world assets) sector has become so strong that it cannot be ignored.
📊 Let's take the CRCL that I often shared before as an example to see the data comparison:
On-chain explosive power: Its spot Alpha trading volume can easily soar to hundreds of millions of dollars.
Traditional market comparison: The average trading volume in traditional stock markets is only 11 million shares, equivalent to about 1.1 billion dollars.
Does the Clarity Act's ban on stablecoin interest cause CRCL to plummet by 20%? Understanding the underlying logic behind Coinbase's early cut.
"Clarity Act" draft has been exposed, and one of the most notable provisions is: stablecoins are strictly prohibited from offering passive interest. As soon as the news broke, the so-called stablecoin issuer $CRCL plummeted by 20%.
The market is in a state of panic, and $COIN 's CEO even came out to state that he "absolutely does not support" this draft.
But if you follow the panic and sell off, then you will truly be washed out of the market. This is actually a very clear signal — this crash is entirely a FUD event.
Do you understand? Let's peel back the surface and see the underlying logic.
The market is in a state of panic, and $COIN 's CEO even came out to state that he "absolutely does not support" this draft.
But if you follow the panic and sell off, then you will truly be washed out of the market. This is actually a very clear signal — this crash is entirely a FUD event.
Do you understand? Let's peel back the surface and see the underlying logic.
Today I saw Binance launch 'Binance AI Pro Beta'
Do heroes see alike? Or was it copied by Binance?
Looking at Binance's skill: the core idea of this official product is almost identical to the proposal I submitted for the 'EcoClaw (Energy-saving Lobster)' at a Binance event a few days ago!
Did Binance copy my idea? With so many talents at Binance, it’s impossible for them to copy my stuff.
This further proves one thing: the best solutions that AI agents can come up with in the trading field is already a consensus in the industry.
When I originally designed EcoClaw, I determined that letting AI 'see' charts was too costly and extremely unstable. So I proposed the core principles:
1. API first: Abandon visual consumption and directly connect to the API to read data.
2. Write calculations instead of mental math: LLM's math is too poor; calculating points must involve AI writing Python to execute.
3. Memory isolation: Strategies and execution modules should be independent to prevent AI from hallucinating.
The engineering direction of Binance AI Pro completely confirms this thinking.
But having the right direction does not mean being able to make money. I gave EcoClaw the freedom to run; although I set a 5% circuit breaker to switch the simulation account's risk control, my total capital still faced a severe drawdown of over 20% under recent extreme market conditions and strategy failures.
This harsh reality tells me: AI is just an efficient execution tool, not a money-printing machine. If you feed it garbage strategies, it will only efficiently help you lose all your money.
Next, I will shift my focus from 'optimizing the AI architecture' back to 'optimizing the trading strategy itself.' After all, no matter how good the tool is, we are still responsible for the gains and losses.
Is everyone looking forward to Binance AI Pro? Or are you also paying tuition fees on the path of AI automated trading? Feel free to leave comments for discussion!
Do heroes see alike? Or was it copied by Binance?
Looking at Binance's skill: the core idea of this official product is almost identical to the proposal I submitted for the 'EcoClaw (Energy-saving Lobster)' at a Binance event a few days ago!
Did Binance copy my idea? With so many talents at Binance, it’s impossible for them to copy my stuff.
This further proves one thing: the best solutions that AI agents can come up with in the trading field is already a consensus in the industry.
When I originally designed EcoClaw, I determined that letting AI 'see' charts was too costly and extremely unstable. So I proposed the core principles:
1. API first: Abandon visual consumption and directly connect to the API to read data.
2. Write calculations instead of mental math: LLM's math is too poor; calculating points must involve AI writing Python to execute.
3. Memory isolation: Strategies and execution modules should be independent to prevent AI from hallucinating.
The engineering direction of Binance AI Pro completely confirms this thinking.
But having the right direction does not mean being able to make money. I gave EcoClaw the freedom to run; although I set a 5% circuit breaker to switch the simulation account's risk control, my total capital still faced a severe drawdown of over 20% under recent extreme market conditions and strategy failures.
This harsh reality tells me: AI is just an efficient execution tool, not a money-printing machine. If you feed it garbage strategies, it will only efficiently help you lose all your money.
Next, I will shift my focus from 'optimizing the AI architecture' back to 'optimizing the trading strategy itself.' After all, no matter how good the tool is, we are still responsible for the gains and losses.
Is everyone looking forward to Binance AI Pro? Or are you also paying tuition fees on the path of AI automated trading? Feel free to leave comments for discussion!
EcoClaw (Energy-Saving Lobster) — Low-Cost Quantitative Co-Driver with Built-in Risk Control and Self-Evolution
🦞 Project Proposal:
In response to Binance's 'Build the Future of Crypto AI' challenge, I share my OpenClaw real-world project: EcoClaw.
Many people give up on AI agents within a few days due to API Tokens being 'too expensive' or 'placing random orders'.
My EcoClaw addresses these two major pain points: reducing costs through a minimalistic structure and ensuring trading discipline through strict SOPs.
🧠 Part One: The Cost-Saving Logic Underlying EcoClaw
To ensure AI survives long-term on Binance, it’s not about telling it what to do, but rather limiting what it 'should not do':
Reject invalid visual consumption: Do not let OpenClaw 'see' screenshots for technical analysis, fully switch to Binance API for data retrieval.
In response to Binance's 'Build the Future of Crypto AI' challenge, I share my OpenClaw real-world project: EcoClaw.
Many people give up on AI agents within a few days due to API Tokens being 'too expensive' or 'placing random orders'.
My EcoClaw addresses these two major pain points: reducing costs through a minimalistic structure and ensuring trading discipline through strict SOPs.
🧠 Part One: The Cost-Saving Logic Underlying EcoClaw
To ensure AI survives long-term on Binance, it’s not about telling it what to do, but rather limiting what it 'should not do':
Reject invalid visual consumption: Do not let OpenClaw 'see' screenshots for technical analysis, fully switch to Binance API for data retrieval.
The Elegy of the Bear Market: The Fall of a Generation's DeFi King Balancer
It is almost a standard pattern that cannot withstand a bear market—once the DeFi king, Balancer announced the closure of its physical entity. This is not just the departure of an ordinary project, but the curtain call of a generation of giants.
📉 The TVL plummeted dramatically
Once, Balancer had a real TVL of up to 3.3 billion dollars. However, after the hacking incident in November last year, funds fled rapidly, and now the remaining TVL is less than 200 million dollars.
💰 Did not make money? Actually, it’s not true
What is most lamentable is that the protocol itself did not 'lose money'. In just 3 months after the urgent patching of the vulnerabilities, Balancer still generated 1 million dollars in trading fees.
📉 The TVL plummeted dramatically
Once, Balancer had a real TVL of up to 3.3 billion dollars. However, after the hacking incident in November last year, funds fled rapidly, and now the remaining TVL is less than 200 million dollars.
💰 Did not make money? Actually, it’s not true
What is most lamentable is that the protocol itself did not 'lose money'. In just 3 months after the urgent patching of the vulnerabilities, Balancer still generated 1 million dollars in trading fees.
🌌 Midnight Mainnet Countdown: The Privacy Revolution is About to Ignite!
Privacy is not a luxury; it is your right. The Midnight Federal Mainnet officially enters the countdown to launch!
- Through ZK Zero-Knowledge Proof, we will redefine data sovereignty.
- No data leakage: proving facts without revealing privacy.
- Compliance development: TypeScript friendly, designed for privacy applications.
- Strong ecosystem: $NIGHT tokens are poised to launch, co-constructing a decentralized future.
The night is approaching, rights are returning. Are you ready to witness the paradigm shift of Web3?
#night $NIGHT @MidnightNetwork
Privacy is not a luxury; it is your right. The Midnight Federal Mainnet officially enters the countdown to launch!
- Through ZK Zero-Knowledge Proof, we will redefine data sovereignty.
- No data leakage: proving facts without revealing privacy.
- Compliance development: TypeScript friendly, designed for privacy applications.
- Strong ecosystem: $NIGHT tokens are poised to launch, co-constructing a decentralized future.
The night is approaching, rights are returning. Are you ready to witness the paradigm shift of Web3?
#night $NIGHT @MidnightNetwork
Countdown to Midnight Mainnet Launch: The Privacy Revolution is about to ignite!
"Privacy is not a luxury, but a fundamental right."
After countless days and nights of testing and development, we finally stand at a turning point in Web3 history. The Midnight Federal Mainnet Kūkolu phase is about to officially launch!🚀
This is not just the birth of a new chain, but the beginning of the era of "rational privacy."
💎 Why is Midnight worth your breathless anticipation?
Data sovereignty returned: Through zero-knowledge proofs (ZK Proofs), you can prove "who you are" or "how much assets you have" without revealing any sensitive details.
After countless days and nights of testing and development, we finally stand at a turning point in Web3 history. The Midnight Federal Mainnet Kūkolu phase is about to officially launch!🚀
This is not just the birth of a new chain, but the beginning of the era of "rational privacy."
💎 Why is Midnight worth your breathless anticipation?
Data sovereignty returned: Through zero-knowledge proofs (ZK Proofs), you can prove "who you are" or "how much assets you have" without revealing any sensitive details.
The Truth About Bitcoin and MSTR: What You Think Is an 'Infinite Flywheel' Is Actually the 'Anchor of the Panic Market'
Many people in the crypto world think that MicroStrategy's
play is an invincible 'price flywheel':
Issuing convertible bonds → Buying Bitcoin → Bitcoin rises → Stock price increases → Raising more funds → Continuing to buy Bitcoin.
This logic of 'stepping on the left foot and the right foot' sounds perfect, but upon closer inspection, one can see the flaws.
MSTR has been using this model for 5 years, buying Bitcoin more than 100 times $BTC .
If this is truly an infinite cycle of price flywheel, then Bitcoin should have skyrocketed by now. But in reality? MSTR's mNAV (net asset value) has repeatedly fallen below 1.
play is an invincible 'price flywheel':
Issuing convertible bonds → Buying Bitcoin → Bitcoin rises → Stock price increases → Raising more funds → Continuing to buy Bitcoin.
This logic of 'stepping on the left foot and the right foot' sounds perfect, but upon closer inspection, one can see the flaws.
MSTR has been using this model for 5 years, buying Bitcoin more than 100 times $BTC .
If this is truly an infinite cycle of price flywheel, then Bitcoin should have skyrocketed by now. But in reality? MSTR's mNAV (net asset value) has repeatedly fallen below 1.
Safe-haven assets that do not hedge
Under normal circumstances, when the world falls into chaos, funds should flow to safe havens. But look at the current market:
The war in Iran continues, and the dawn of peace is still a long way off;
There is no sign of a Russian representative at the Ukraine-Russia negotiation table;
Oil prices are skyrocketing, and even the United States is trying to adjust to the chaos of sanctions against Russia.
In such a turbulent overall economic environment, the US stock SPY has retraced nearly 10%, and market panic is spreading.
I ask, who now believes this is not the time to hedge?
However, gold, which is regarded as the ultimate safe-haven asset, has plummeted by 20%;
Those silver stocks that have been wildly speculated have been directly halved. Gold is still gold, and silver is still silver; the physical supply and demand have not collapsed overnight. So, what exactly has changed their fate?
The war in Iran continues, and the dawn of peace is still a long way off;
There is no sign of a Russian representative at the Ukraine-Russia negotiation table;
Oil prices are skyrocketing, and even the United States is trying to adjust to the chaos of sanctions against Russia.
In such a turbulent overall economic environment, the US stock SPY has retraced nearly 10%, and market panic is spreading.
I ask, who now believes this is not the time to hedge?
However, gold, which is regarded as the ultimate safe-haven asset, has plummeted by 20%;
Those silver stocks that have been wildly speculated have been directly halved. Gold is still gold, and silver is still silver; the physical supply and demand have not collapsed overnight. So, what exactly has changed their fate?
The "currency issuance circle" in AI? The power games of foundational models and the Bitcoin apocalypse
As the craze for "lobster" continues to heat up, the core of AI has become the most intense battlefield in the tech world, and it can even be said that it has reached a stage of "desperate" hand-to-hand combat.
For example, just as the founder of Openclaw recommended MiniMax, the CEO of Anthropic quickly called him out, accusing that their model was essentially "distilled" from their own Claude.
Today, an outrageous scoop broke: the unicorn Causor, valued at hundreds of billions of dollars, had its new product's core exposed as directly "skinned" from the Kimi 2.5 of the Dark Side of the Moon! They were too lazy to retrain the model, and it got caught as soon as it went online.
For example, just as the founder of Openclaw recommended MiniMax, the CEO of Anthropic quickly called him out, accusing that their model was essentially "distilled" from their own Claude.
Today, an outrageous scoop broke: the unicorn Causor, valued at hundreds of billions of dollars, had its new product's core exposed as directly "skinned" from the Kimi 2.5 of the Dark Side of the Moon! They were too lazy to retrain the model, and it got caught as soon as it went online.
Wobble waist smoking card!
'Wobble waist smoking card!'
If you've seen the movie (The Gambling Master II: The Legend of the Gambling God), you must have heard this famous quote by the French gambling god, Piacca.
But in reality, whether in the movie plot or in the real world casino, the cards are dealt by professional dealers, so there is actually no need to 'verify the cards'.
This is actually very similar to the concept of 'blockchain': the data on the chain is completely public and transparent, unalterable, and since everyone can check it, isn't there theoretically 'no need for regulation'?
In fact, the real world is not that simple.
Just look at the example of XRP. Before it was clearly included in the regulatory system, XRP was heavily scrutinized by the SEC and got caught in a long litigation quagmire, causing the coin price to drop severely.
If you've seen the movie (The Gambling Master II: The Legend of the Gambling God), you must have heard this famous quote by the French gambling god, Piacca.
But in reality, whether in the movie plot or in the real world casino, the cards are dealt by professional dealers, so there is actually no need to 'verify the cards'.
This is actually very similar to the concept of 'blockchain': the data on the chain is completely public and transparent, unalterable, and since everyone can check it, isn't there theoretically 'no need for regulation'?
In fact, the real world is not that simple.
Just look at the example of XRP. Before it was clearly included in the regulatory system, XRP was heavily scrutinized by the SEC and got caught in a long litigation quagmire, causing the coin price to drop severely.
midnight the strongest support level
this is not a call
Due to the lack of initial institutional control
Institutions that want to control must first accumulate positions
It can be seen that the current main price is around 0.06
If it goes bullish, then that is the strongest support level
If it goes bearish, institutions must inevitably accumulate positions at lower levels
Downward Fibonacci around 0.032
The initial stage without institutional control is the cleanest betting market
#night $NIGHT
this is not a call
Due to the lack of initial institutional control
Institutions that want to control must first accumulate positions
It can be seen that the current main price is around 0.06
If it goes bullish, then that is the strongest support level
If it goes bearish, institutions must inevitably accumulate positions at lower levels
Downward Fibonacci around 0.032
The initial stage without institutional control is the cleanest betting market
#night $NIGHT
Originally the AI leader OpenAI
The desktop version of the super application has surprisingly not been released yet
Not to mention Doubao has already been released, the second tier of AI would naturally have more new tricks
But the first tier Claude has been out for quite some time
Even Perplexity Comet can complete half of its functions
Even OpenClaw Lobster, Chrome has also opened remote DevTools MCP
Achieving all needs through AI agents
At this time, Microsoft $MSFTon legally sued OpenAI and Amazon $AMZNon for their collaboration
Microsoft claims to have an exclusive supply contract with OpenAI
Will this put the already lagging OpenAI into a dire situation
#OpenAI plans to launch a desktop super application
The desktop version of the super application has surprisingly not been released yet
Not to mention Doubao has already been released, the second tier of AI would naturally have more new tricks
But the first tier Claude has been out for quite some time
Even Perplexity Comet can complete half of its functions
Even OpenClaw Lobster, Chrome has also opened remote DevTools MCP
Achieving all needs through AI agents
At this time, Microsoft $MSFTon legally sued OpenAI and Amazon $AMZNon for their collaboration
Microsoft claims to have an exclusive supply contract with OpenAI
Will this put the already lagging OpenAI into a dire situation
#OpenAI plans to launch a desktop super application
Binance News
·
--
AI Trends | OpenAI Plans to Launch Desktop 'Super App'
According to reports from Caijing, OpenAI is reportedly taking steps to simplify user experience and plans to launch a desktop 'super app' that integrates Codex, ChatGPT, and a browser.
Meta's loss prevention and the bleeding Metaverse
After a sharp drop of 20% from its historical high, $METAon this corporate giant that dominates the global social networking seems to have finally awakened from a costly illusion, facing the bottomless pit that it has been stuck in—the Metaverse.
Meta announced it will gradually close the core VR applications of the Metaverse starting in March, shifting the group’s strategic focus entirely to AI.
Calculating the numbers, this epic pit of the Metaverse has ruthlessly burned through Meta's cash flow to the tune of 80 billion US dollars.
But if you think this is just a simple 'cutting off the tail to survive', you underestimate Mark Zuckerberg.
Meta announced it will gradually close the core VR applications of the Metaverse starting in March, shifting the group’s strategic focus entirely to AI.
Calculating the numbers, this epic pit of the Metaverse has ruthlessly burned through Meta's cash flow to the tune of 80 billion US dollars.
But if you think this is just a simple 'cutting off the tail to survive', you underestimate Mark Zuckerberg.
Do true safe-haven assets really exist?
Recently, the situation in Iran has escalated again, directly impacting the core oil supply chain in the Middle East—Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE are all involved, while Iran's own oil fields have also come under attack. Logically, this level of geopolitical risk should be the moment when 'safe-haven assets' come into play.
However, the market has given a thought-provoking answer: Gold ($XAU ) and silver ($XAG ) not only did not rise, but instead fell simultaneously.
This actually exposes a key issue—the so-called 'hedge' is often just market consensus, rather than an absolute rule. Once liquidity, the dollar, interest rates, or risk preferences change, traditional safe-haven assets may also fail.
Even the predictive markets have not provided a clear answer. On $POL , Polymarket has not formed a consistent expectation regarding the timeframe of this conflict, instead showing that the market itself is highly uncertain about 'how long it will drag on'.
When risk comes from 'physical resource supply' rather than the financial system, the market's reaction may be completely different. Oil affects the entire industrial chain; under a highly globalized supply structure, if one energy node encounters problems, it impacts thousands of industries. In this situation, what truly rises may not be gold, but rather resources that are closer to supply and demand—such as wheat, soybeans, or even various energy and raw material futures.
In other words, in extreme circumstances, the market does not have a truly stable safe haven, only 'relative beneficiaries'.
As for how long this wave of unrest in Iran will last? I tend to believe it won't drag on for too long. Once energy prices spiral out of control, the destructive power on the global economy is too direct, and countries have no incentive to let the situation escalate indefinitely. In a highly interdependent supply chain system, oil is not just energy, but the cornerstone of the entire modern economy.
When risks begin to threaten the overall system, it often means that all parties will seek some form of 'forced de-escalation' more quickly.
Perhaps what truly needs rethinking is not which assets can hedge, but rather—under different types of risks, who will be the next core to be repriced.
#伊朗 #石油危机
Recently, the situation in Iran has escalated again, directly impacting the core oil supply chain in the Middle East—Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE are all involved, while Iran's own oil fields have also come under attack. Logically, this level of geopolitical risk should be the moment when 'safe-haven assets' come into play.
However, the market has given a thought-provoking answer: Gold ($XAU ) and silver ($XAG ) not only did not rise, but instead fell simultaneously.
This actually exposes a key issue—the so-called 'hedge' is often just market consensus, rather than an absolute rule. Once liquidity, the dollar, interest rates, or risk preferences change, traditional safe-haven assets may also fail.
Even the predictive markets have not provided a clear answer. On $POL , Polymarket has not formed a consistent expectation regarding the timeframe of this conflict, instead showing that the market itself is highly uncertain about 'how long it will drag on'.
When risk comes from 'physical resource supply' rather than the financial system, the market's reaction may be completely different. Oil affects the entire industrial chain; under a highly globalized supply structure, if one energy node encounters problems, it impacts thousands of industries. In this situation, what truly rises may not be gold, but rather resources that are closer to supply and demand—such as wheat, soybeans, or even various energy and raw material futures.
In other words, in extreme circumstances, the market does not have a truly stable safe haven, only 'relative beneficiaries'.
As for how long this wave of unrest in Iran will last? I tend to believe it won't drag on for too long. Once energy prices spiral out of control, the destructive power on the global economy is too direct, and countries have no incentive to let the situation escalate indefinitely. In a highly interdependent supply chain system, oil is not just energy, but the cornerstone of the entire modern economy.
When risks begin to threaten the overall system, it often means that all parties will seek some form of 'forced de-escalation' more quickly.
Perhaps what truly needs rethinking is not which assets can hedge, but rather—under different types of risks, who will be the next core to be repriced.
#伊朗 #石油危机
Privacy Sidechain Brawl: When Midnight Collides with POL, who will be the final cover?
In the world of cryptocurrency, privacy has always been like a 'ghost'—everyone says it’s important, but in terms of coin price performance, it often seems trivial. With the official arrival of Midnight (NIGHT), the barriers in the privacy track are being broken, and a brawl about 'compliant privacy' and 'cross-chain anonymity' has begun.
Old brand new star: $POL (originally MATIC) grand ambition and stark reality
When it comes to privacy and compliance, many people overlook that old powerhouse that has already changed its skin—POL.
Although POL will officially be renamed and listed in 2024, its soul actually emerged as early as 2019 with Polygon (MATIC). POL's positioning has long surpassed that of a simple Ethereum L2. Its ambition is to become 'the value layer of the internet':
Old brand new star: $POL (originally MATIC) grand ambition and stark reality
When it comes to privacy and compliance, many people overlook that old powerhouse that has already changed its skin—POL.
Although POL will officially be renamed and listed in 2024, its soul actually emerged as early as 2019 with Polygon (MATIC). POL's positioning has long surpassed that of a simple Ethereum L2. Its ambition is to become 'the value layer of the internet':
Experience doesn't necessarily lead you to success; it might lead you to step into the same pit for the second time.
Written at the time of A2Z coin delisting
Seeing the news that $A2Z coin is about to be delisted, I couldn't help but feel a wave of nostalgia in front of the screen.
As a second-generation coin, A2Z carries the memories and unfulfilled aspirations of many regarding its predecessor $LOKA coin.
Initially, I still held a glimmer of expectation for the GameFi track. We always have a natural intuition: having experienced the ups and downs and the burst of the first generation, the team should have 'learned their lesson,' right? With the second generation learning from past mistakes and accumulating experience, it should be able to walk more steadily and further.
Seeing the news that $A2Z coin is about to be delisted, I couldn't help but feel a wave of nostalgia in front of the screen.
As a second-generation coin, A2Z carries the memories and unfulfilled aspirations of many regarding its predecessor $LOKA coin.
Initially, I still held a glimmer of expectation for the GameFi track. We always have a natural intuition: having experienced the ups and downs and the burst of the first generation, the team should have 'learned their lesson,' right? With the second generation learning from past mistakes and accumulating experience, it should be able to walk more steadily and further.
Emergency Announcement!
Dark web leak, claiming that hackers have successfully obtained the weapon design blueprints of China's supercomputing center
Starting bid at $10 $XMR, highest bidder wins
Although Monero has never been a T1 cryptocurrency
It is definitely a T1 underground economy cryptocurrency
Although it is not openly spoken, this is the cryptocurrency that the government might actually reserve.
Dark web leak, claiming that hackers have successfully obtained the weapon design blueprints of China's supercomputing center
Starting bid at $10 $XMR, highest bidder wins
Although Monero has never been a T1 cryptocurrency
It is definitely a T1 underground economy cryptocurrency
Although it is not openly spoken, this is the cryptocurrency that the government might actually reserve.
Is this organization rolling up and fleeing?
Suddenly dropped 20% without any warning
The biggest news recently is that Binance's CZ invested in RoboForce
And claimed: Invested in a very capable robot that (for now) will not trade
RoboForce is a physical robot
And the ROBO launched by @Fabric Foundation is an on-chain token for robots
Perhaps this wave of cold water has led to a withdrawal of funds
Be careful in trading and don't get cut
#robo $ROBO
Suddenly dropped 20% without any warning
The biggest news recently is that Binance's CZ invested in RoboForce
And claimed: Invested in a very capable robot that (for now) will not trade
RoboForce is a physical robot
And the ROBO launched by @Fabric Foundation is an on-chain token for robots
Perhaps this wave of cold water has led to a withdrawal of funds
Be careful in trading and don't get cut
#robo $ROBO
The Nightmare of Altcoin Season
Recently, there has been a pessimistic sentiment in the market: "There will never be another altcoin season."
Some say this is because the number of altcoins has already reached crisis levels;
Some say it's because the market is flooded with too many worthless Meme coins that are diverting funds;
Some people say that the strength of the US stock market and the tokenization of RWA have completely drained the attention from the crypto world.
These statements are all partially true, but not entirely.
To see through this market, we must first break a myth: prices are actually not as difficult to manipulate as you think.
The powerlessness of retail investors and the targeting by institutions
Some say this is because the number of altcoins has already reached crisis levels;
Some say it's because the market is flooded with too many worthless Meme coins that are diverting funds;
Some people say that the strength of the US stock market and the tokenization of RWA have completely drained the attention from the crypto world.
These statements are all partially true, but not entirely.
To see through this market, we must first break a myth: prices are actually not as difficult to manipulate as you think.
The powerlessness of retail investors and the targeting by institutions
Login to explore more contents