Walle_E
历史最好战绩160倍的ach，50倍的gala，20倍的rndr，60倍的cspr。专注底部抄底，从来不追高。
16 Following
168 Followers
140 Liked
3 Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
$100 a barrel of oil, indeed Brother Jianguo is basically done for, successfully causing the U.S. to start hyperinflation, the outcome he might not have predicted, is this situation, thinking that Iran
is the same as Venezuela
is the same as Venezuela
Crypto麻子新
·
--
Trump's ultimatum in the past 48 hours is, to put it bluntly, more for the voters than for Iran. If oil prices really hit $100, it would basically be political suicide for the U.S. president, and he cannot be unaware of this.
But the problem is that Iran's mentality has changed. After being sanctioned, negotiated with, and having agreements torn up repeatedly over the past few years, they have accepted one thing: talking to the U.S. holds no long-term credibility. So this time, getting them to sit down for serious discussions is much more difficult than before. They are more inclined to first 'show some color' before discussing anything else.
However, many people think of this matter too linearly, saying that Iran wants to drive up oil prices to crush the U.S. stock market; this logic is somewhat idealistic. Today's America is not the same country that relied solely on oil imports; rising oil prices will indeed pressure consumption, but it will also provide a lifeline to America's own energy industry. You might say there will be a shock, but it won't completely collapse the U.S. stock market.
What we need to observe is not whether there will be a conflict, but to what extent it will escalate.
A person like Trump does not need to engage in a real major battle; he only needs the market and voters to feel—he is tough, he dares to take action, but the situation is still under control.
So a more realistic script is likely to be the familiar scenario:
Small-scale actions, proxy friction, localized escalation, and then continuing to make tough statements, keeping the rhythm in a 'tense but not explosive' range.
Iran is the same; it is unlikely to go all in directly. If they were to truly block shipping lanes or launch large-scale attacks on energy facilities, it would drag them down with it. It is more likely they will prolong the cycle, grinding slowly, keeping the situation hanging.
To put it bluntly, this is not a game of who can crush whom, but a competition of who can better control the rhythm.
So your final question—would Trump dare to risk the collapse of the U.S. stock market to blow up a power plant?
A more realistic answer is: he will make moves that 'look daring,' but he won't truly bring the market down with him.
But the problem is that Iran's mentality has changed. After being sanctioned, negotiated with, and having agreements torn up repeatedly over the past few years, they have accepted one thing: talking to the U.S. holds no long-term credibility. So this time, getting them to sit down for serious discussions is much more difficult than before. They are more inclined to first 'show some color' before discussing anything else.
However, many people think of this matter too linearly, saying that Iran wants to drive up oil prices to crush the U.S. stock market; this logic is somewhat idealistic. Today's America is not the same country that relied solely on oil imports; rising oil prices will indeed pressure consumption, but it will also provide a lifeline to America's own energy industry. You might say there will be a shock, but it won't completely collapse the U.S. stock market.
What we need to observe is not whether there will be a conflict, but to what extent it will escalate.
A person like Trump does not need to engage in a real major battle; he only needs the market and voters to feel—he is tough, he dares to take action, but the situation is still under control.
So a more realistic script is likely to be the familiar scenario:
Small-scale actions, proxy friction, localized escalation, and then continuing to make tough statements, keeping the rhythm in a 'tense but not explosive' range.
Iran is the same; it is unlikely to go all in directly. If they were to truly block shipping lanes or launch large-scale attacks on energy facilities, it would drag them down with it. It is more likely they will prolong the cycle, grinding slowly, keeping the situation hanging.
To put it bluntly, this is not a game of who can crush whom, but a competition of who can better control the rhythm.
So your final question—would Trump dare to risk the collapse of the U.S. stock market to blow up a power plant?
A more realistic answer is: he will make moves that 'look daring,' but he won't truly bring the market down with him.
The cryptocurrency circle will educate all so-called value investors who hold long positions.
$SSV Brothers, the project party is watching my position, here comes a $2 big order, it seems the project party is ready to take me down, brothers.
Hahaha, AI is quite harmful!
Will $SXT break 0.03 tonight under Microsoft's support?
{spot}(SXTUSDT)
{spot}(SXTUSDT)
5000 reward, still the biggest upgrade hahaha
cssv test network is now online, an important turning point for the ssv project, looking forward to the official launch of the staking feature $SSV
$SXT is suitable for buying a little bit every day, investing for 2-3 months. If it hasn't increased yet, then retreat.
The coin price is too low; the project team is selling the coins too cheaply and wants to raise the price to facilitate monthly shipments.
Tomorrow ssv will have significant news release
@Binance BiBi explain it
The Ethereum Foundation officially launched treasury staking, planning to deploy 70,000 ETH. This marks the foundation's shift from simply 'selling tokens for fundraising' to 'earning interest for sustainability', supporting protocol development and ecological funding through sustainable cash flow.
From a fundamental perspective, this not only reduces market pressure from EF's irregular sell-offs but, more importantly, it adopts Dirk's distributed signature and multi-client solutions, showcasing the highest standards of decentralized staking while enhancing network security. The chip structure has stabilized, and operational confidence has increased, which significantly restores confidence in Ethereum's long-term logic. The foundation is no longer in a rush to dump, so can the holders remain calm?
$ETH $LDO $SSV
{future}(SSVUSDT)
{future}(LDOUSDT)
{future}(ETHUSDT)
From a fundamental perspective, this not only reduces market pressure from EF's irregular sell-offs but, more importantly, it adopts Dirk's distributed signature and multi-client solutions, showcasing the highest standards of decentralized staking while enhancing network security. The chip structure has stabilized, and operational confidence has increased, which significantly restores confidence in Ethereum's long-term logic. The foundation is no longer in a rush to dump, so can the holders remain calm?
$ETH $LDO $SSV
{future}(SSVUSDT)
{future}(LDOUSDT)
{future}(ETHUSDT)
$SSV liquidity exhaustion... the market crash, even with positive news, the benefits are limited, it might still fall
This big market, with good news, is of no use, it can't rise much
Tomorrow ssv will have significant news release
So the market is extremely short of money.
CZ hard-hitting Warren: Cryptocurrency never needed bailouts, and it never will
CZ directly fires back. Retweeting U.S. Senator Warren's remarks—"Cryptocurrency does not need taxpayer bailouts."
CZ replies: Crypto never needs, and never will. Warren has long been anti-crypto, and this time his words are pointed, hinting at the industry's weakness.
CZ strikes at the heart: the essence of decentralization is self-rescue; banks rely on taxpayers for support. The facts are clear: during the 2008 financial crisis, banks received trillions in bailouts; the crypto bear market survived on its own.
This confrontation exposes the old regulatory mindset clashing with new realities. The industry's confidence lies here: not needing bailouts is the biggest advantage.
Don't panic about short-term emotions; in the long run, the greater the regulatory pressure, the more the value of decentralization stands out. This article is for industry information sharing only and does not constitute any investment advice. The risks in the cryptocurrency market are extremely high; please make rational decisions. Are you with CZ or Warren? Just say it in the comments, like, retweet, and follow, so you don't miss the hot topics.
#CZ #沃伦 #加密监管 #比特币 #行业底气
CZ directly fires back. Retweeting U.S. Senator Warren's remarks—"Cryptocurrency does not need taxpayer bailouts."
CZ replies: Crypto never needs, and never will. Warren has long been anti-crypto, and this time his words are pointed, hinting at the industry's weakness.
CZ strikes at the heart: the essence of decentralization is self-rescue; banks rely on taxpayers for support. The facts are clear: during the 2008 financial crisis, banks received trillions in bailouts; the crypto bear market survived on its own.
This confrontation exposes the old regulatory mindset clashing with new realities. The industry's confidence lies here: not needing bailouts is the biggest advantage.
Don't panic about short-term emotions; in the long run, the greater the regulatory pressure, the more the value of decentralization stands out. This article is for industry information sharing only and does not constitute any investment advice. The risks in the cryptocurrency market are extremely high; please make rational decisions. Are you with CZ or Warren? Just say it in the comments, like, retweet, and follow, so you don't miss the hot topics.
#CZ #沃伦 #加密监管 #比特币 #行业底气
$BNB 1011, the karma you create yourself, the consequences you bear yourself, you reap what you sow
$BTC If there were no 1011 incident, and liquidity was drained, perhaps we could really see 600k BTC and 10,000 Ethereum in 2026. The fact is we have to wait until 2027; the 1011 incident has hurt the industry too deeply. Let's wait, entering the market at the absolute bottom (40k for Bitcoin is not a dream, and 1000 for Ethereum can also be expected) $ETH
It's over, 1700-1500 is going to be set, openly provoking, there's a high probability it will explode, and after the explosion, it will be bloodied chips
$ETH He really panicked, so he started to lie.
What use is it, continuously falling without any consolidation
Binance News
·
--
The usage of encrypted payment cards has significantly increased, with daily transaction numbers rising to about 60,000.
The usage of encrypted native payment cards significantly increased from mid-December 2024 to mid-January 2026, with daily transaction numbers rising by about 22 times.
According to reports by Wu, Etherfi currently accounts for about half of the total transaction volume, with participants such as Gnosis, MetaMask, and Solayer still in the market. Some products provide returns on card balances through DeFi lending.
The encrypted payment card mainly relies on the Visa and Mastercard networks, reflecting the continued participation of traditional payment systems in the consumption scenarios of encrypted assets.
According to reports by Wu, Etherfi currently accounts for about half of the total transaction volume, with participants such as Gnosis, MetaMask, and Solayer still in the market. Some products provide returns on card balances through DeFi lending.
The encrypted payment card mainly relies on the Visa and Mastercard networks, reflecting the continued participation of traditional payment systems in the consumption scenarios of encrypted assets.
$BTC Trump is stirring up trouble again, threatening a trade war. It is estimated that his resignation would be the biggest benefit.
$SSV Recently, is there another unlocking and increase in issuance? Raising prices to facilitate sales? How does it go up and come back down, before 12 o'clock at night, wrong performance eats xx
Login to explore more contents