ObaAgon

I only post on Binance Square, X, and the TG group. All other platforms charge under false pretenses, please be cautious!
Please recognize my account name ObaAgon, there are too many impersonators!
—————————————————————
Explanation:
Bullish: 'Define high point'. Bullish directional energy. Bullish main behavior dynamics;
Bearish: 'Define low point'. Bearish directional energy. Bearish main behavior dynamics;
Starting with the defined high point. Bullish directional dynamics, dynamics will have time dynamics, regardless of how bullish actions are made. Ultimately, it is for defining the high point.
So if the bulls do not enter at the highest point, how can it be called a high point?
—————————————————————
'Event-driven, event occurrence rate is only 30%'
For example, event bulls: Event bulls have event news, most people do not know that news events are going to happen, so before the event detonates, there will only be a short squeeze, and when the event occurs, there will be a direct spike. Event bulls only represent events, not bullish actions; simply stating event bulls means only events without bullish actions, which leads to only bearish actions.
During the short squeeze process before the event occurs, if the event does not happen, the price may have already been declining throughout this process.
—————————————————————
'A high point' does not represent a high price.
'A low point' does not represent a low price.
In terms of low points, the text is different from low prices.
For example: low price low point, high price low point. Price and point are different things.
—————————————————————
'Build high point' 'Build low point'
Bearish builders establishing low points is a dynamic process. Only the bearish can achieve the lowest point price; ordinary people do not have the capability to absorb large liquidity orders. Therefore, the establishment of a low point occurs after the bearish start placing orders; during this order placement period, a price low point will be produced. Before the bearish leaves, a low point will appear before moving to a high point. As time passes and comes to an end, the K-line price will show a V shape, moving from the top of V to the bottom of V and back to the tail of V, producing a process called building a low point.

#BTC

The price of oil seems to be experiencing an exaggerated situation, and the blockade of the Gulf of Aden appears to have a significant impact.

The impact on American oil is minimal, but the overall economic behavior will be affected.

Pay attention to the oil crisis in the next two days.
#oil
#石油

Is Bitcoin’s Value Actually Zero?
Is the value of BTC really 0?

Is the value of BTC really 0?
Cryptocurrency does not have shareholder dividends. Moreover, developers have no income equivalent; the project team uses BTC to pay for developer contributions, which in reality gives developers something of zero value.

However, does BTC have any value?

It depends on who you negotiate with, who is willing to receive your worthless BTC, and how much they are willing to pay?

Thus, there is a place called an exchange where willing parties trade something of 0 value.

So, BTC is neither a stock with dividends nor a stock that earns interest by staking; it is neither.

So what does the blockchain call this?

"Consensus"

Therefore, strictly speaking, this is about determining how much your BTC is worth based on mutual consent regarding something that has no value.

Thus, it is equivalent to saying BTC is always worthless.
It is also equivalent to asking, "How much value does the BTC you hold have?" How much are others willing to pay for something that has no value as a value?

So there is no need to criticize whether Wall Street's assertion that BTC has no value is correct or incorrect.

Because BTC inherently has no value; it is called "how much value your BTC has in hand," which is not the same as "how much value BTC has."

To clarify this statement:
"How much value does BTC have?"
does not equal
"How much value does your BTC have in hand?"

So how many "you hold in hand" BTC are there?

The correct definition is "the number of wallets corresponds to the number of values"; if there are one hundred million BTC wallets, there are one hundred million different BTC values.

Next, let's look at PI; similarly, each BTC and each PI has a different value.

So those who do not agree with GCV 314159 can simply choose not to agree.

But if your PI is valued at 0.1, what does GCV have to do with it?

Likewise, if GCV is valued at 314159, what does it have to do with those who do not agree?

If you do not understand the so-called value of the tokens "you hold in hand," then it is best to exit cryptocurrency as soon as possible.

So why is BTC considered to potentially be worth five million in the future?

Because the so-called BTC you hold has someone willing to buy 100% of it, therefore, "all dollars are waiting to buy your BTC" is equivalent to "all BTC is priced by buyers."
$BTC

How to help Pi get out of its slump and back on track, these are the ways:

How to help the depressed and struggling Pi develop, methods are as follows:

The ways to help Pi, which is in a slump and in a difficult situation, are as follows:

1. Download and install the pinetwork to log in.

2. See the total number of Pi.

3. Take a deep breath.

4. Close Pi and uninstall Pi to lie flat.

#pi

※Breaking※BREAKING※
What happened to MARA, the world’s third-largest Bitcoin treasury company?
What happened to the world’s third-largest treasury company MARA?

"MARA suddenly sold 15133 btc" for a total of one billion dollars

Did they sell it or transfer it elsewhere?
What exactly happened?
Does anyone know?
$BTC
$ETH

A review of BTC's history on the 25th:
After the previous upward movement, a major high point was mentioned at 19:00 on the 25th.

I speculate that this major force is definitely related to those who pay attention to Trump, or people related to Trump.
$BTC

Trump can be considered the savior of the cryptocurrency market.
After a bill passes, those project parties making false promises will either escape or evade.

However, I believe that investors should not worry about losses because of this; instead, they should focus on helping each other. Only the project parties are fleeing, and there are only so many of them. As long as investors stick it out over time, they won't need to worry about the price.

As long as the community has capable developers and a continuously growing ecosystem, and investors do not leave the market to help stabilize the price, then the project parties that have escaped will also come back under a new name after they have exited the risk.

Always remember this saying: "The future is always created by oneself"
$BTC
$ETH

PI miners come and take a look, doesn't Pi already have 20 million mapped pioneers?
Doesn’t Pi already have 20 million mapped pioneers? Why is the article discussing why the number is so low?

Four days have passed, let's take a look at the total data of articles tagged with PI across the internet.

It gets worse day by day. I've listed the three tags that will be used. Some people go around criticizing others for riding on PI's traffic, as if their criticism is effective, leading to no one wanting to post about PI.

There are 20 million pioneers online, and many are also using it on Twitter. Most people just want to lie flat and wait for others to help them get rich.

Is there anyone still on PI?
Is there anyone who wants to discuss PI?
Leave a message with the tag PI, let's see how many people still want to discuss.

Those who blindly cling to the news of benefits without understanding the underlying reasons are more likely to make opposing moves.

The most important news on the 26th was the news of the White House's approval of the bill.

The update from the OIRA regulatory review system was completed at 6:10 AM on the 26th, so the price started to decline after returning to its peak at 6 o'clock.

Therefore, this bill affects the scam projects that make false promises to attract funds, leading them to flee for their lives.

Because those promises are simply unachievable and false, the scam projects began to escape privately, but so far no one has realized that this escape is the main reason.

Until now, the media continues to report more details about the bill, leading to more certain projects that are illegal continuing to flee.

Think about it, if blindly following the bill equals good news, then one would judge it as a significant benefit when seeing the news of the bill's approval at 6:10 AM on the 26th. The result after the announcement was a continuous decline. Then one might ask why? Or attribute the reason to the good news being exhausted?

If one understands the reasons, they would know in advance that the approval of the bill would lead to a sell-off before any good news.
$BTC
#透明度法案

Goldman Sachs determines that the BTC price has hit the bottom,
This is of course a pull, I don't believe Goldman Sachs dares to go against the Trump team.
Now Goldman Sachs announces,
This is also good news for BTC,
Goldman Sachs belongs to the banking sector, and now it's like choosing sides, aligning with the Trump camp.
$BTC

$ETH

Musk is about to launch X money,
and he will offer an annual interest rate of 6% for USDT,
which is super high.

I have decided that after the launch, I will transfer all my large funds to X money.

The total staking of X money will therefore skyrocket, scaring everyone!
#xmoney
#X
#usdt

Take a look at the historical review from the 23rd to today mentioned in the previous BTC article after the scheduled surge:

After the timely rise, the article continued to mention that it would continue to rise after the 24th.

As a result, the rise started after the end of the 24th. It is not to say that it continued to rise on the 23rd.

In the future, the main force will announce its plans in advance, please refer to the explanation in the self-introduction above on X.
$BTC
$ETH

Technical analysis is used to determine the occurrence of signals or to estimate various situations as a basis for building positions. In my articles, there is none of this.

My articles are contrary to technical analysis; they do not establish positions just because there is a claim that major players are going to speculate.

This is because, at high points, it is mostly bullish sentiment; the short selling volume at this time is very low and cannot be considered as major players.

Even if big names short a little at high points, like retail investors, they are still referred to as retail investors and do not represent major influencers afterward.

However, subsequent pressure from the major players must be the retail volume building positions at high points, which cannot be called major players, but they are aligned with future major shorting points before becoming major players.

Therefore, when it is mentioned that there is speculation about shorting, it means they have already built short positions at high points. If they are only now considering building positions, there is a chance of being manipulated by them.

Because they can choose to remain inactive afterward, and they still profit from the price difference, while you are stuck at the cost price.

These are explained in the text, so please read my explanations more carefully 🤣

https://x.com/obaagon/status/1959669372781547858?s=46&t=dblS2Hwd76fGLQ2bf96PUQ

$BTC

Once the PI time reaches the 29th, it's the beginning of takeoff.
It is essential to focus on completely sweeping the air force before the 29th.
#pi

I think pi users definitely don't need to be pessimistic.
What is there to be pessimistic about?

Let's take a look at the leading WLD, which was launched by OpenAi's Altman.

So far, pi has accomplished what WLD cannot do; basically, in the global AI verification field, it has become synonymous with pi, both being American companies.

Now let's look at the price; WLD has dropped from its highest price to a low of 0.264, a decline of 97.8%. And now there is no sign of recovery at all.

Looking at pi, it has fallen from its highest price to 0.13, a decline of 95.67%, and recently has started to see good news one after another.

This is good; I have a suggestion:
For all pi users, if you could send a message to WLD investors, what would you say?
#PI
#pinetwork
#WLD $WLD

BTC mentioned that the day of the bull return is March 23 on March 15.

Today is already the 23rd, and just now a single spike with a trading volume of 3 billion occurred.

Will it be a bull return?
$BTC
$ETH

On PI, some people think that the 70 million miners worldwide are great.
Others feel that the 40 million miners who have not yet been mapped are not respected.

However, let's take a look at the total data of PI articles tagged on Twitter X, along with the attached image.

From the attached image, it can be seen that most people think they are great, but the total number of posts tagged with PI among the 70 million miners and pioneers is less than 200.

Tell me, where do you think you are great?

If you haven't even passed the basic conditions, where is the greatness?

Face the reality, dear PI friends, and see that the AI above does not respond to PI at all.
Stop thinking of yourselves as great, or that the 70 million miners are impressive.

Does X not want 70 million users?
If you were really great, AI would not ignore the questions about PI.

A large group of people is chatting and making noise in the community group every day, with no substantial contributions at all.

The ridiculous thing is that this group still hopes for Binance to list PI, which no one talks about.

#PI

These two days clearly mark the passage of the encryption bill, which allows all scam projects in the cryptocurrency space to flee.
The bill is a huge benefit for legitimate cryptocurrency projects, but before the benefits, those scam projects will escape
$BTC
$ETH

Looking back at the competition process at pi, I posted at 2 AM on the 22nd, and checked at 7 AM to see if there was a new low.

As a result, at 7 AM, it dropped on time, with btc and eth dropping on schedule.
#pi

In the PI community, I have some opinions：
In the PI community, I have some opinions:

I think the vast majority of PI pioneers are always engaging in meaningless chatter; please put some effort into doing concrete things.

The big data on Twitter X shows that the total number of articles tagged with PI is less than 500 articles per day.

This is truly laughable.

It can be seen that, including everyone in various groups, strictly speaking, participating in PI has become a joke; everyone just wants to lie flat, with 99.995% of people waiting for PCT charity to feed them.

This is equivalent to claiming that among the 20 million pioneers and 70 million miners on the entire network, only 0.0025% of marketers are doing anything, with the number of people involved in developing the ecosystem being less than 0.005%.

99.995% of people are waiting for PCT charity to feed them; what basis do these people have for expecting others to support them?
#PI