LadyAR
Без надежды. Только расчёт.
High-Frequency Trader
3.2 Years
1 Following
430 Followers
1.8K+ Liked
151 Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
Videos
Well, show off your %%%
Great deal, as for me👌
I hope you weren't afraid to go short with me yesterday?
Great deal, as for me👌
I hope you weren't afraid to go short with me yesterday?
{future}(ONUSDT)
#on Crowd in euphoria.
The whale is unloading completely 😂
I might short along with it 😂
#on Crowd in euphoria.
The whale is unloading completely 😂
I might short along with it 😂
#BTC decided to share thoughts on the movement today
So, what do we see.
The price went down a bit to shave off the shorts in the area of 72K. I was really waiting to see 73K, BUT!
Liquidity at this level has been intentionally left - which means we will fly higher! Exactly higher! Why?
Because at 73K there is a very good pool in the form of short stops, and their forced closure (which means market purchases) will drive the price even higher - into the zone of 80K +
The price went down a bit to shave off the shorts in the area of 72K. I was really waiting to see 73K, BUT!
Liquidity at this level has been intentionally left - which means we will fly higher! Exactly higher! Why?
Because at 73K there is a very good pool in the form of short stops, and their forced closure (which means market purchases) will drive the price even higher - into the zone of 80K +
Probably, I didn't waste the whole day for nothing 😂
One deal with its movement closed the entire daily statistics 👍🔥
Wishing everyone a good evening!
One deal with its movement closed the entire daily statistics 👍🔥
Wishing everyone a good evening!
{future}(ONUSDT)
#on Crowd in euphoria.
The whale is unloading completely 😂
I might short along with it 😂
#on Crowd in euphoria.
The whale is unloading completely 😂
I might short along with it 😂
#power Notifications have come that we have reached the price 0.08, which I previously marked as "the bottom"
I don't even know, guys, whether I need it or not 🤷♀️
So far, this asset is risky for me. Long holders are sitting like flies...
What are your thoughts?
I don't even know, guys, whether I need it or not 🤷♀️
So far, this asset is risky for me. Long holders are sitting like flies...
What are your thoughts?
Guys, MM has entered the market. There will be sharp movements now!
Well, why is it so funny 😂😂
🇮🇷 Iran is currently one of the largest BTC miners in the world, accounting for 6-8% of the global hash rate, according to analysts.
70% of mining in the country is carried out by the military.
And you talk about geopolitics, democracy🤦♀️
70% of mining in the country is carried out by the military.
And you talk about geopolitics, democracy🤦♀️
Another confirmation of how the information field works against the retail investor!
Oh, I wish I had seen this in time😩
Remember:
"Urgently buy, this will cost $100"
"Whales are just starting to accumulate positions"
"In a month it will be 10X"
and so on and so forth - a loxian scam!
No one will advise the crowd on what they can earn from 🤦♀️ You are called to become liquidity!
Oh, I wish I had seen this in time😩
Remember:
"Urgently buy, this will cost $100"
"Whales are just starting to accumulate positions"
"In a month it will be 10X"
and so on and so forth - a loxian scam!
No one will advise the crowd on what they can earn from 🤦♀️ You are called to become liquidity!
Attempt number 2
The stop is at used
If they tear it down this time too - I'll go all in and roll this infection down to 0 😂
Just kidding, I always follow risk management just in case!👌
The stop is at used
If they tear it down this time too - I'll go all in and roll this infection down to 0 😂
Just kidding, I always follow risk management just in case!👌
Why RSI deceives beginners (and how to use it correctly)
RSI — one of the most popular indicators. Almost every beginner starts with it because it seems simple:
▶️ above 70 — overbought,
▶️ below 30 — oversold.
Sounds logical. But this is exactly where the biggest mistake begins.
❌️ 1. Overbought ≠ signal to short
▶️ above 70 — overbought,
▶️ below 30 — oversold.
Sounds logical. But this is exactly where the biggest mistake begins.
❌️ 1. Overbought ≠ signal to short
#SKYAIUSDT
Liquidity withdrawals 0.06160 (+-) and shaving long positions down by 0.050
I will make an average in the resistance area. A couple of limit orders, one of which is at the local high.
Liquidity withdrawals 0.06160 (+-) and shaving long positions down by 0.050
I will make an average in the resistance area. A couple of limit orders, one of which is at the local high.
A couple of days ago, one person wrote to me that I run a blog for the sake of earning from subscribers.
Honestly — it's even a little funny 🤡 But, I still haven't published my trades for two days, just in case 👌 Sharing screenshots "as a fact" is also some kind of madness, in my opinion 😁
I'm attaching a screenshot 😂
If you really think that I'm wasting my time on analytics, breakdowns, forecasts, and trades for such amounts — I have nothing to add. With my trading statistics, it just doesn't make sense.
I share my market vision, scenarios, news, educational content, logic of movements — and, as many see, this often confirms the market!
But if it all comes down to this being "for the sake of 30 cents", then perhaps it's easier to stop writing anything at all 🤔
Honestly — it's even a little funny 🤡 But, I still haven't published my trades for two days, just in case 👌 Sharing screenshots "as a fact" is also some kind of madness, in my opinion 😁
I'm attaching a screenshot 😂
If you really think that I'm wasting my time on analytics, breakdowns, forecasts, and trades for such amounts — I have nothing to add. With my trading statistics, it just doesn't make sense.
I share my market vision, scenarios, news, educational content, logic of movements — and, as many see, this often confirms the market!
But if it all comes down to this being "for the sake of 30 cents", then perhaps it's easier to stop writing anything at all 🤔
"Spot is safe." The truth that is comfortable to believe
Today one comment made me sit down to write this article👇
One of the most common myths among beginners is the belief that spot trading is safer than futures trading.
The argument is usually simple: "I won't be liquidated, so I'm safe."
Sounds logical. But only at first glance.
One of the most common myths among beginners is the belief that spot trading is safer than futures trading.
The argument is usually simple: "I won't be liquidated, so I'm safe."
Sounds logical. But only at first glance.
Miners are working "for free": minus $14,000 for each BTC 📉
Mining bitcoin now is a dubious pleasure. According to Checkonchain, the production cost of one BTC has jumped to $82,600, while the market offers just over $68,000 for it.
Outcome: a loss of $14,600 on each coin. Even a 7.7% reduction in network difficulty doesn't save the situation as energy prices continue to press from above.
If this continues, miners will start actively selling off reserves just to survive.
What are your thoughts on this, gentlemen?
Mining bitcoin now is a dubious pleasure. According to Checkonchain, the production cost of one BTC has jumped to $82,600, while the market offers just over $68,000 for it.
Outcome: a loss of $14,600 on each coin. Even a 7.7% reduction in network difficulty doesn't save the situation as energy prices continue to press from above.
If this continues, miners will start actively selling off reserves just to survive.
What are your thoughts on this, gentlemen?
Now they are stirring up the story about a "major insider" before Trump's statement: supposedly someone opened huge positions in advance and perfectly timed the market movement.
I got curious, and I checked this news👌
In short: there is no confirmation for this.
— there is no data on specific trades of this volume
— there are no confirmations from major media or analysts
— there are no facts that can be verified
This is a typical example of when the market is explained in hindsight:
first, a movement occurs, then a “logical” story is invented for it.
Why is this false?
Because real insiders of this scale:
— leave a clear trace
— end up in reports
— quickly become the subject of investigations
There is none of this here.
Why is it so easy to believe in this?
Because:
— people want to explain the market as “someone's control”
— it's easier to think that “someone knows” than to admit uncertainty
— the brain loves beautiful coincidences
💬 The reality is simpler:
the market moves not because “someone knew everything,”
but because someone bet on probabilities — and got it right.
I got curious, and I checked this news👌
In short: there is no confirmation for this.
— there is no data on specific trades of this volume
— there are no confirmations from major media or analysts
— there are no facts that can be verified
This is a typical example of when the market is explained in hindsight:
first, a movement occurs, then a “logical” story is invented for it.
Why is this false?
Because real insiders of this scale:
— leave a clear trace
— end up in reports
— quickly become the subject of investigations
There is none of this here.
Why is it so easy to believe in this?
Because:
— people want to explain the market as “someone's control”
— it's easier to think that “someone knows” than to admit uncertainty
— the brain loves beautiful coincidences
💬 The reality is simpler:
the market moves not because “someone knew everything,”
but because someone bet on probabilities — and got it right.
Are you looking at the order book and thinking you see the market? Spoiler: no!
Today one comment under my post made me sit down and write this article👇
I hope 🙏 it helps many avoid mistakes in trading 👌
❌️ The order book is not "insider information from major players."
✅️ This is the place where you get scammed the fastest.
Let's figure out why 👇
❌ Myth #1: "There is a major player there"
I hope 🙏 it helps many avoid mistakes in trading 👌
❌️ The order book is not "insider information from major players."
✅️ This is the place where you get scammed the fastest.
Let's figure out why 👇
❌ Myth #1: "There is a major player there"
Well, it's like a fairy tale 🤩
Even in the morning, the crowd was shorting the lows, and as soon as there was a bit of growth, they drove them into longs at the highs 🤣
Sometimes I am really amazed at how quickly they change their positions 🚀
But never mind 😉 Of course, no one will pull the crowd along, so now they will push it down to the 69K area, while simultaneously gathering short sellers for a repeated impulse to 73K
Patience, gentlemen and ladies 🥲
Even in the morning, the crowd was shorting the lows, and as soon as there was a bit of growth, they drove them into longs at the highs 🤣
Sometimes I am really amazed at how quickly they change their positions 🚀
But never mind 😉 Of course, no one will pull the crowd along, so now they will push it down to the 69K area, while simultaneously gathering short sellers for a repeated impulse to 73K
Patience, gentlemen and ladies 🥲
So, Monday, the start of a new week and new movements. Let's talk about #btc
{future}(BTCUSDT)
Earlier, I wrote that I expect the price to go to 71K and 73K to take out the liquidity of the short sellers.
The scenario has been partially realized; we visited the 71K zone, but there wasn't enough liquidity to go straight to 73K, which we successfully accumulated over two weekends!
The false breakout at 68K trapped the crowd in a bearish trap. Now their stop-losses are a magnet for the market maker, and if I were in their place, I would push this whole crowd upwards with an impulse, just to 73K.
Base scenario:
▶️ bounce up (72K-73K)
▶️ reversal
▶️ move down (65K zone)
Why do I believe the price should drop to at least 65K?
Well, first of all: at 73K, the crowd will sharply flip into longs, and they won't be easily pushed higher.
Secondly: there is little liquidity at the current level to push the price straight to 82K, where we will definitely go as well.
Thirdly: liquidity at the 75K level has already been partially taken out. Meanwhile, late long holders from 65K are still in the game.
This gives me reason to think that it would be very convenient for the market maker to accumulate positions for a move to 82K at the expense of the long holders who will panic sell at 65K.
But let's discuss this again when we are at 73K.
Right now, I expect growth!
{future}(BTCUSDT)
Earlier, I wrote that I expect the price to go to 71K and 73K to take out the liquidity of the short sellers.
The scenario has been partially realized; we visited the 71K zone, but there wasn't enough liquidity to go straight to 73K, which we successfully accumulated over two weekends!
The false breakout at 68K trapped the crowd in a bearish trap. Now their stop-losses are a magnet for the market maker, and if I were in their place, I would push this whole crowd upwards with an impulse, just to 73K.
Base scenario:
▶️ bounce up (72K-73K)
▶️ reversal
▶️ move down (65K zone)
Why do I believe the price should drop to at least 65K?
Well, first of all: at 73K, the crowd will sharply flip into longs, and they won't be easily pushed higher.
Secondly: there is little liquidity at the current level to push the price straight to 82K, where we will definitely go as well.
Thirdly: liquidity at the 75K level has already been partially taken out. Meanwhile, late long holders from 65K are still in the game.
This gives me reason to think that it would be very convenient for the market maker to accumulate positions for a move to 82K at the expense of the long holders who will panic sell at 65K.
But let's discuss this again when we are at 73K.
Right now, I expect growth!
Guys, if you see such posts - you can safely open the shorts🤣
Out of curiosity, I went to check what this "mega" banana is about - well, it's just the perfect moment for a leak ↘️
Out of curiosity, I went to check what this "mega" banana is about - well, it's just the perfect moment for a leak ↘️
Login to explore more contents