CryptoLoverArtist
I have been in crypto since 2016, on Binance since 2021. I love cryptocurrencies. I'm also an artist and a designer. Trading is my first love! BTC is Love
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
8 Years
609 Following
701 Followers
1.1K+ Liked
388 Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Gold (PAXG) has fallen quite a bit and I am bullish on Gold again
war can keep going on
Also other factors
Highly recommend to buy Spot gold and keep it
sell it over $5000
$PAXG
war can keep going on
Also other factors
Highly recommend to buy Spot gold and keep it
sell it over $5000
$PAXG
The drop in Bitcoin's Short-Term Holder (STH) Supply in Profit below 50% is a significant on-chain indicator that often marks a transition into bear market conditions or a major cycle bottom.
Bearish Context: As of March 13, 2026, the percentage of STH supply in profit has fallen below 50%, meaning over half of recent buyers (those who bought within the last 155 days) are currently "underwater".
Market Sentiment: This threshold indicates that the majority of newer market participants are facing unrealized losses, which historically increases the likelihood of panic selling or "capitulation".
Early Bear Signal: Analysts from CryptoQuant have noted that when "Supply in Loss" (the inverse of supply in profit) approaches the 40–45% range, it typically aligns with the early stages of a bear market.
Bottom Indicator: While bearish in the immediate term, Glassnode data suggests this level can also signal market bottoms. Selling pressure often exhausts itself at these levels because remaining holders become unwilling to realize further losses.
Recovery Precondition: Sustained price recovery generally requires this metric to flip back above 50% to restore positive momentum among the most active trading cohort.
Disclaimer: Post is manual but image is AI
#BTCReclaims70k
Bearish Context: As of March 13, 2026, the percentage of STH supply in profit has fallen below 50%, meaning over half of recent buyers (those who bought within the last 155 days) are currently "underwater".
Market Sentiment: This threshold indicates that the majority of newer market participants are facing unrealized losses, which historically increases the likelihood of panic selling or "capitulation".
Early Bear Signal: Analysts from CryptoQuant have noted that when "Supply in Loss" (the inverse of supply in profit) approaches the 40–45% range, it typically aligns with the early stages of a bear market.
Bottom Indicator: While bearish in the immediate term, Glassnode data suggests this level can also signal market bottoms. Selling pressure often exhausts itself at these levels because remaining holders become unwilling to realize further losses.
Recovery Precondition: Sustained price recovery generally requires this metric to flip back above 50% to restore positive momentum among the most active trading cohort.
Disclaimer: Post is manual but image is AI
#BTCReclaims70k
More disruptive markets coming
be prepared
Volatility can be good or bad
Learn to master it
don't over leverage yourself
be prepared
Volatility can be good or bad
Learn to master it
don't over leverage yourself
Bought BNB at 584 and old it at 633
Not bad
$BNB anytime below 600 you should buy!!
Not bad
$BNB anytime below 600 you should buy!!
S
BNB/USDT
Price
633.27
Bitcoin is back in an accumulation zone after the recent selloff, with price stabilizing around the high‑60Ks and short‑term sentiment in extreme fear — a setup that has often preceded strong bounces in past cycles. Over the next few weeks, I’m watching the 65K–70K area as key support/resistance, expecting volatility but a bias toward gradual recovery if these levels hold.
Medium term (next 6 months), the broader outlook remains bullish as long as BTC holds above major support in the 60K–70K band, with many analysts still projecting a wide upside range toward new highs if ETF flows and adoption trends stay intact.
$BTC
I’m treating dips into strong support as accumulation opportunities, managing risk tightly because 2026 is shaping up as a trader’s market, not a straight‑line moonshot. 🚀
#MarketRebound
Medium term (next 6 months), the broader outlook remains bullish as long as BTC holds above major support in the 60K–70K band, with many analysts still projecting a wide upside range toward new highs if ETF flows and adoption trends stay intact.
$BTC
I’m treating dips into strong support as accumulation opportunities, managing risk tightly because 2026 is shaping up as a trader’s market, not a straight‑line moonshot. 🚀
#MarketRebound
Making money in this market is really difficult , but its possible !!
32% increase in assets in last 7 days
#Consistency and hard work and luck!
32% increase in assets in last 7 days
#Consistency and hard work and luck!
7D Asset Change
+$15,359.72
+32.26%
interesting
**BTC: What’s Really Going On With This Drop?**
Bitcoin has just gone through a sharp post‑parabolic correction, sliding from the euphoric highs and breaking below key levels like 80k. This move looks brutal on the chart, but structurally it still fits the pattern of a classic crypto shake‑out after a huge run.
**Why BTC is falling**
- Macro risk‑off: Global risk sentiment has turned cautious, and high‑beta assets like BTC are usually first in line when investors de‑risk.
- ETF outflows: Spot BTC ETFs, which were a big driver on the way up, have started to see outflows, forcing selling of spot coins and removing a key demand engine.
- Leverage washout: Derivatives positioning was heavily skewed long, so once key supports broke, a wave of liquidations accelerated the downside.
- Technical breakdown: Losing the 84–85k area and then 80k flipped former support into resistance and triggered stop‑loss cascades.
**Key technical levels I’m watching**
- Short‑term resistance:
- 80–83k: First band BTC must reclaim to even start repairing the chart.
- 87–90k: Major resistance; reclaiming and holding above here would signal a serious trend recovery, not just a dead‑cat bounce.
- Support zones:
- 71k: First “line in the sand” for bulls; holding above here keeps the medium‑term structure intact.
- 64k: Next strong demand area if 71k fails.
- Below 64k: Opens the door to a deeper flush towards older breakout regions.
Momentum indicators on the higher timeframes are still pointing down, with no clean bullish divergence yet, which suggests sellers remain in control for now.
**Is this the bottom?**
No one can time the exact bottom, and treating any single price as “the” level is dangerous. A more realistic way to think about it:
- This drop is likely part of a broader bottoming *zone*, not necessarily the final wick.
Bitcoin has just gone through a sharp post‑parabolic correction, sliding from the euphoric highs and breaking below key levels like 80k. This move looks brutal on the chart, but structurally it still fits the pattern of a classic crypto shake‑out after a huge run.
**Why BTC is falling**
- Macro risk‑off: Global risk sentiment has turned cautious, and high‑beta assets like BTC are usually first in line when investors de‑risk.
- ETF outflows: Spot BTC ETFs, which were a big driver on the way up, have started to see outflows, forcing selling of spot coins and removing a key demand engine.
- Leverage washout: Derivatives positioning was heavily skewed long, so once key supports broke, a wave of liquidations accelerated the downside.
- Technical breakdown: Losing the 84–85k area and then 80k flipped former support into resistance and triggered stop‑loss cascades.
**Key technical levels I’m watching**
- Short‑term resistance:
- 80–83k: First band BTC must reclaim to even start repairing the chart.
- 87–90k: Major resistance; reclaiming and holding above here would signal a serious trend recovery, not just a dead‑cat bounce.
- Support zones:
- 71k: First “line in the sand” for bulls; holding above here keeps the medium‑term structure intact.
- 64k: Next strong demand area if 71k fails.
- Below 64k: Opens the door to a deeper flush towards older breakout regions.
Momentum indicators on the higher timeframes are still pointing down, with no clean bullish divergence yet, which suggests sellers remain in control for now.
**Is this the bottom?**
No one can time the exact bottom, and treating any single price as “the” level is dangerous. A more realistic way to think about it:
- This drop is likely part of a broader bottoming *zone*, not necessarily the final wick.
Told everyone to buy GOLD s long as Trump is in power !!
You can also buy via via #TradeFi in Binance or using $PAXG
You can also buy via via #TradeFi in Binance or using $PAXG
keep buying GOLD
as long as Trump is in power, Gold will increase
PAXG $PAXG is the gold based stable coin
OR you can buy gold in TradeFi on Binance!!
as long as Trump is in power, Gold will increase
PAXG $PAXG is the gold based stable coin
OR you can buy gold in TradeFi on Binance!!
What did I say
keep buying GOLD!! ($PAXG)
also waiting for LINK
lets see if i was right or wrong on that
#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat
keep buying GOLD!! ($PAXG)
also waiting for LINK
lets see if i was right or wrong on that
#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat
Buy LINK
chain link signs agreement with NYSE
they'll be using Chainlink for tokenized trading of US stocks!
$LINK
You are welcome
#NYSE
chain link signs agreement with NYSE
they'll be using Chainlink for tokenized trading of US stocks!
$LINK
You are welcome
#NYSE
B
LINK/USDT
Price
12.92
Best way to get rich via crypto?
1. Don't gamble
Sell all your bad altcoins and only focus on a few good currencies like Bitcoin will fall today but that's the best part. Get more in dips
Do DCA slowly every day
Also get BNB, SOL and a few others
Patience is the key!
#StrategyBTCPurchase
1. Don't gamble
Sell all your bad altcoins and only focus on a few good currencies like Bitcoin will fall today but that's the best part. Get more in dips
Do DCA slowly every day
Also get BNB, SOL and a few others
Patience is the key!
#StrategyBTCPurchase
BNB
Holding
Cumulative PNL
+3,084.37 USDT
#2025withBinance Start your crypto story with the Binance Year in Review and share your highlights!
it says I made profits more than 98% of the users!! I don't believe it
FollowMe for a FollowBaxk
it says I made profits more than 98% of the users!! I don't believe it
FollowMe for a FollowBaxk
Adding positions is really a matter of luck. Ideally, you keep adding when there's unrealized profit, but what actually happens? Most of the time, you're forced to add when you're at a floating loss. Opportunities to add when in profit are painfully rare.
The most heartbreaking part is the market trend: when it rises, it just keeps going up endlessly, rising for six or seven days without a break. Conversely, when it falls, it’s just as stubborn—there's no decent rebound when it drops, it's entirely a one-sided market.
$BTC $ETH $SOL These mainstream coins can't escape this pattern either; their volatility is so great that it catches people off guard.
#SECxCFTCCryptoCollab
The most heartbreaking part is the market trend: when it rises, it just keeps going up endlessly, rising for six or seven days without a break. Conversely, when it falls, it’s just as stubborn—there's no decent rebound when it drops, it's entirely a one-sided market.
$BTC $ETH $SOL These mainstream coins can't escape this pattern either; their volatility is so great that it catches people off guard.
#SECxCFTCCryptoCollab
New Fed Chair in USA
Jerome Powell’s term as Federal Reserve Chair ends in May 2026, and the race to succeed him is a significant macroeconomic story. Several candidates, each with distinct monetary policy philosophies, are being discussed. The Fed’s leadership is crucial given ongoing inflation pressures, slowing growth indicators, and market sensitivity to policy moves.
Potential frontrunners include:
Kevin Hassett, a White House economic adviser, known for his dovish views and advocating significant rate cuts.
Christopher Waller, a Fed governor with a more technocratic reputation, supporting cautious rate cuts when data allows.
Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor, historically hawkish but showing flexibility in response to growth concerns.
Other potential candidates are governors like Michelle Bowman or James Bullard, with varying hawkish/dovish leanings.
Favored Candidate: Christopher Waller (Most Balanced & Pragmatic)
If I had to choose one candidate whose stance best fits the current macro backdrop, it would be Christopher Waller. He is data-driven, open to measured rate cuts as the economy slows, yet willing to act against inflation if it accelerates. His track record shows flexibility—supporting tightening during inflation spikes and easing cautiously when conditions soften. This approach helps preserve Fed credibility on inflation while addressing weakening growth signals. In the current environment—inflation above target in certain sectors, a softening labor market, and persistent market volatility—this balance is critical.
Alternative Candidate: Kevin Hassett (Dovish, Growth-Focused)
Pros: Aggressive rate cuts could boost growth and liquidity, lifting equities, risk assets, and crypto in the short term. It could provide an initial confidence boost to markets if investors perceive easier money as a floor for growth.
Cons: Political alignment raises concerns about Fed independence and long-term inflation credibility. If inflation accelerates while policy remains loose, long-term bond yields could spike, and equities could face volatility after initial optimism.
Kevin Warsh & Other Candidates (Complex/Mixed Impact)
Warsh historically leans hawkish, but recent conditions may push him toward pragmatic easing. His approach could provide credibility with moderate flexibility, balancing inflation expectations and growth. Markets might react neutrally, favoring predictability over extremes.
#WriteToEarnUpgrade
Potential frontrunners include:
Kevin Hassett, a White House economic adviser, known for his dovish views and advocating significant rate cuts.
Christopher Waller, a Fed governor with a more technocratic reputation, supporting cautious rate cuts when data allows.
Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor, historically hawkish but showing flexibility in response to growth concerns.
Other potential candidates are governors like Michelle Bowman or James Bullard, with varying hawkish/dovish leanings.
Favored Candidate: Christopher Waller (Most Balanced & Pragmatic)
If I had to choose one candidate whose stance best fits the current macro backdrop, it would be Christopher Waller. He is data-driven, open to measured rate cuts as the economy slows, yet willing to act against inflation if it accelerates. His track record shows flexibility—supporting tightening during inflation spikes and easing cautiously when conditions soften. This approach helps preserve Fed credibility on inflation while addressing weakening growth signals. In the current environment—inflation above target in certain sectors, a softening labor market, and persistent market volatility—this balance is critical.
Alternative Candidate: Kevin Hassett (Dovish, Growth-Focused)
Pros: Aggressive rate cuts could boost growth and liquidity, lifting equities, risk assets, and crypto in the short term. It could provide an initial confidence boost to markets if investors perceive easier money as a floor for growth.
Cons: Political alignment raises concerns about Fed independence and long-term inflation credibility. If inflation accelerates while policy remains loose, long-term bond yields could spike, and equities could face volatility after initial optimism.
Kevin Warsh & Other Candidates (Complex/Mixed Impact)
Warsh historically leans hawkish, but recent conditions may push him toward pragmatic easing. His approach could provide credibility with moderate flexibility, balancing inflation expectations and growth. Markets might react neutrally, favoring predictability over extremes.
#WriteToEarnUpgrade
Venezuela stock market increased 17% in 1 day after US kidnapped their president. Lols
Login to explore more contents