密智君 Crypto Plus AI

Brothers, to speak frankly, Musk is really going to dig up the ancestral tomb of banks this time! I just saw the parameters of the X Money credit card, and I was completely stunned. Are you still saving in banks for that pitiful interest? Wake up, the times have changed!

Let me break down how outrageous this thing is for you:
Annual interest rate for active savings is 6%! Just think about it, which bank dares to offer this amount? And this is for active savings, not fixed deposits. Cash back of 3%, unconditional, unlimited. This is simply a reduction in consumption.
Foreign currency handling fee is 0%, global ATM withdrawals are free. Those traveling abroad and online shoppers are going to cry tears of joy. The most critical point is that there is FDIC insurance of $250,000, insured by Cross River Bank, so at least the security isn't a flimsy setup.

I have seen many cards in the crypto world that claimed “high returns,” but in the end either ran away or cut benefits. But this time it's old Musk personally stepping in, and he has invited the former CPO of Aave to design it. This is not just a card; this is the strongest weapon for X to become a “universal application.”

Practical advice: If you are still using your bank card to earn that little interest, you must read this post to the end.
1. Don’t wait until the whole internet is buzzing about it to line up; check now in the payment settings of X to see if there’s a pre-registration entry.
2. Deposit some spare cash, 6% active savings, isn't that better than buying those altcoins that might go to zero at any time?
3. Spend directly with this card, the 3% cash back accumulates, and saving a position for one BTC in a year is not a dream.
I might be wrong, but I think this is what the future of finance looks like. If banks do not reform, they will eventually be killed by Musk's rogue tactics.

Brothers, how long do you think the 6% active savings can last? Is Musk just throwing money around or does he really have a magical skill to reduce costs and increase efficiency?
#xmoney

Wow! Taking 70 billion dollars to the grave, is this the real "ultimate destruction" in the crypto world?

Brothers, let's talk about something serious today.

To be honest, after so many years in the crypto world, I've seen people make huge profits and I've seen liquidations, but I've never seen anything as outrageous as Mircea Popescu. It is said that this guy drowned while swimming in Costa Rica, taking with him 70 billion dollars worth of Bitcoin.

Just think about it, 70 billion dollars, 1 million Bitcoins, directly locked on the blockchain, in this life, the next life, and the life after that, no one can touch it.

When I first heard this news, my first reaction was disbelief. I thought to myself, how could a guy with so much money not have a backup plan? Later, when I looked up his posts on Bitcointalk, I realized this guy was really crazy; he didn't trust anyone at all, and even believed that the only safe place for a private key was rotting in his own mind.

So what happened? A wave came, and he was gone, and the coins became dead coins.
To be honest, this is a bit interesting, but it’s also quite lamentable. We shout every day, "With the private key in hand, I have the world," but reality gave us a resounding slap: people are the biggest vulnerability.

I seriously thought about this issue; although the disappearance of those 1 million coins, logically speaking, is a kind of "passive destruction" of Bitcoin, indirectly increasing the value of the coins we hold, the cost is just too heavy. This is not just a person's life; it's a hardcore memory of an era.
To be honest, I used to pursue extreme cold wallets and multi-signatures, but after being misled by a few projects and experiencing the passing of friends and family, I changed my mind. If you really love your family, don't hide the private key too well. Otherwise, one day when you really go "swimming," what you leave behind is not wealth, but a regret that your family can never open for a lifetime.

I can only say this operation is — amazing, but really, don’t try to learn from it.

Finally, I want to ask you brothers, if you have 1 million BTC in your hands, would you choose to take the private key to the grave, or leave a "backdoor" for the person you trust the most?

Let's discuss in the comments, don't tell me you haven't made an inheritance plan yet.
$BTC $ETH #iOS安全更新

I just saw a message, not sure if it's true, but if it is, it's a bit absurd – have you noticed that the narrative around AI Agents has suddenly been thrust into the spotlight? Even that SBF account is spreading the word that 'AI agents will be the future of cryptocurrency payments.' Although I have reservations about his character, to be honest, there's nothing wrong with that logic.

I thought seriously about this issue: we used to think of AI as just a tool, helping us write code and create art. But the situation has changed; AI is starting to have its own 'wallets.' Look at those projects like Virtual Protocol, they are already creating an Agent economy. This is not just about issuing a coin; it’s that AI is really engaging in native transactions on the chain.

Brothers, ponder this carefully – if in the future there are AI agents running all over the streets, they can’t possibly go to the bank to queue up for an account, right? Banks also won’t issue credit cards to a code program. The only way out is cryptocurrency, especially stablecoins and those high-performance public chains (like the recently corrected $SOL).
The most absurd part of this is that we are still debating whether Bitcoin will rise to 70,000 or fall to 60,000, while the AIs might already be quietly building a financial system that we completely don’t understand. I’ve misjudged many sectors before, but this time with the combination of AI and Crypto, I feel there’s something to it.
This is not blowing smoke; the data speaks for itself:
In the past 16 hours, the AI sector overall has risen by more than 2%, while the market is still fluctuating. What does this indicate? It indicates that smart money is already drilling in this direction. I've been in the industry for 3 years, have been liquidated and made big money, and my deepest insight is: when a narrative shifts from 'air' to 'necessity,' that is an opportunity.
Risk warning: don’t rush into a full position. Currently, 90% of AI projects are still just rebranded garbage; you must see if there is genuine infrastructure support. I had high hopes for an AI project last week and ended up being proven wrong; this industry is deep, folks, take care of yourselves.
Do you think AI agents will really become the largest 'users' of cryptocurrency? Or is this just a new story concocted by project parties to sell their tokens? See you in the comments. #国际油价上涨
$TAO

Brothers, recently the price of this VPN (LetsVPN) has risen a bit absurdly, and this wave of operation really makes people a little confused.

I thought seriously about this issue. Did the price increase of this VPN happen because the costs couldn't be sustained, or do they think that we crypto enthusiasts are all big fat sheep? To be honest, I analyzed this, and there are probably a few reasons behind it:

First, the cost of circumventing the wall is indeed rising. The current environment has become increasingly strict, maintaining those servers, buying bandwidth, and developing obfuscation technology probably cost a lot of money. Plus, with the recent incident in Hubei where a girl was fined for circumventing the wall, the regulatory pressure is high. These VPN providers have to keep their technology updated frequently to avoid detection, which requires real financial investment.

Second, LetsVPN might feel that their user stickiness is strong enough. After all, in the community, LetsVPN has always been known for its "stability." Many people are too lazy to mess around and think that if it's a bit more expensive, so be it, as long as it doesn't drop the connection. This mentality is surely well understood by the manufacturers, isn’t it just because they know we can't live without it?
But to be honest, this price increase has a significant impact on us users.

"Admission fees" have increased: The market was already not good, and now just to check the market or scroll through Twitter, the annual fixed expenses have increased again. The risk-reward ratio has changed: If you only occasionally circumvent the wall, with the current price and the recent regulatory trends, think about it, does this cost-performance ratio seem a bit low? People are starting to look for alternatives: This price increase is likely to drive away quite a few old users to try those cheaper or even self-built "ladders."

I might be wrong, but I think this operation by LetsVPN is a bit risky. If the service doesn't keep up with the price increase, or if they become a focus due to their popularity, then it could become really interesting.

Do you think this price increase is reasonable? Or are you already preparing to switch to other tools? Let’s chat in the comments and see if anyone has better alternatives.

Brothers, I just saw some news, not sure if it's true, but if it is, it’s a bit explosive—The Federal Reserve is going to issue an emergency announcement tomorrow!

To be honest, old Powell (Jerome Powell) is scheduled to speak at 10:30 AM Eastern Time, and this is not just a routine affair; it's labeled as an "emergency announcement." Think about it, during such a time, suddenly coming out with this, traders and analysts are probably sweating, all staring to see if something shocking is about to happen.

The market is already as tense as a string, and any hint of aggressive action could send stocks, cryptocurrencies, and bonds into a major upheaval. This is not blowing smoke; the data is here, and experts have already given the warning: if old Powell releases bad news tomorrow, it could lead to a historically severe sell-off.

I might be wrong, but I think the most taboo thing right now is emotional trading. If you still hold a heavy position, you must read this post to the end—significant changes could happen within these few hours.

This is likely the news that will be trending across the internet tomorrow; my friends, hold your positions, stay alert, and don’t get shaken out at this critical moment.

Do you think old Powell is coming to put out fires or to start them? Let’s chat in the comments and see what everyone thinks.
$BTC
#美联储何时降息？

Today I saw a set of financing data that really left me speechless.
While everyone else was joking in the group about the "post-00s restructuring the workplace," these young people have already flipped the table and taken the main seat at the AI poker table.

Here are some outrageous data points:
25-year-old Hong Letong, who established his company just over a year ago, directly raised $200 million in Series A, with a valuation reaching $1.6 billion (11 billion RMB).
Guo Hangjiang, a senior student at Beiyou, spent 10 days "handcrafting" an AI prediction engine, and Chen Tianqiao directly invested 30 million.
Then there's Chen Yuanpei, with a background from Peking University and Stanford, who is working on a robotic dexterous hand and has raised 2 billion in just over a year; Yale PhD Yang Fengyu, who hasn't even launched a product yet, has already secured hundreds of millions in funding for the concept of a nanny robot.

Brothers, what does this indicate?
It indicates that the current market is not investing in any specific practical applications, but is crazily抢注ing the "future." Capital is in a state of extreme anxiety, fearing that they might miss the ticket to the next era, so they are blindly throwing money at these top brains of Generation Z.

This reminds me of the current Crypto market. The older generation is still tangled up in what TPS, what cross-chain bridges, and what Ethereum legitimacy are, while the hot money outside has long gone chasing AI + Web3, pursuing those new narratives that they can't even understand.

My judgment:
In the next year or two, the wealth effect from the AI sector will definitely spill over into Crypto. Those old public chains that rely solely on PPT storytelling will suffer greatly, while projects that can truly integrate AI computing power, data, and even robotic concepts, even if they are just makeshift teams, will have their valuations skyrocket.

Soul-searching question:
If you currently have 100,000 U, would you choose:
A. To bottom-fish those plummeting "old value coins"
B. To go all in on a new AI + Crypto project created by these post-00s geniuses
Let me know your choice in the comments, and also tell me which AI-related asset you are optimistic about?
$WLD $FET

#美国“无王”抗议 Over the weekend, I was scrolling through Twitter and came across a shocking scene —
More than 1,400 locations across the U.S. erupted in protests simultaneously, with the flags saying "No Kings".
Not a particular city, not a particular state, but 1,400 locations at once.

My first reaction wasn’t to check the news, but to look at BTC's 4-hour candlestick chart.
I found that Bitcoin hardly moved over the weekend, still hovering around 66,000.
What does this indicate? The market has temporarily chosen to "wait and see" instead of "run away".
But I don’t think this is stable.

Historically, every time there has been a significant political rift in the U.S., the first reaction of capital has been to flee to safe-haven assets — gold, U.S. treasuries, Swiss francs. Cryptocurrencies have been vying for the title of "digital gold" in recent years, but whenever a true black swan event occurs, it is never clear whether they are a safe-haven asset or a risk asset; the market's answer has never been unified.

In the early days of the 2020 pandemic, Bitcoin was halved alongside U.S. stocks.
In 2022, during the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Bitcoin fell and then rose, ultimately outperforming gold.
What about this time?

My judgment is: if the protests remain on the streets and do not evolve into a constitutional crisis or a drastic shift in financial policy, the crypto market will at most experience fluctuations and will not collapse.

But there is one variable I’m keeping a close eye on — the Federal Reserve.
Once political turmoil translates into fiscal policy, if Trump starts large-scale monetary easing to stabilize the situation, then once liquidity loosens, the crypto market will be the first to benefit.
Conversely, if the turmoil escalates to affect institutional confidence, and ETF funds continue to flow out, then the 60,000 mark will indeed become dangerous.

In conclusion:
Political chaos does not necessarily spell disaster for crypto; sometimes it is the best opportunity to prove its narrative of "no kings to govern".
It all depends on whether Bitcoin can hold up this story.
Do you think this wave of protests will substantially impact the crypto market?
$BTC

A few days ago, I was chatting with a friend who just entered the circle. He asked me how AI Agents actually combine with Web3. I said, it's like the electrical appliances in your home; some have two-pin plugs, some have three-pin plugs, and some have USB ports, all mixed up. If every appliance had to have a dedicated socket, that would be so troublesome?

At this point, the MCP (Model Context Protocol) is a bit like that 'universal socket' or 'standard charger'.

Think about it, now there are various AI models and Agents emerging one after another, each with its own 'language' and 'interface'. If an Agent wants to check some data on the chain, it first has to learn the language of the chain; if it wants to get a service from another Agent, it has to learn its language too. Doesn't that just get messy? It's inefficient and prone to errors.

But with MCP, it's like setting up a 'universal translator' and 'standard connector' among these AI Agents. No matter which AI model you are, no matter which Web3 protocol you want to interact with, as long as everyone follows the MCP 'protocol', seamless communication can happen, and data can flow smoothly. Doesn't this greatly improve efficiency and lower development barriers?

So, this MCP thing sounds a bit technical, but it addresses the 'chickens talking to ducks' problem between AI Agents and Web3. It enables AI Agents to better leverage the decentralization, transparency, and programmability of Web3, and also allows Web3 to better integrate the intelligence of AI. This is the real infrastructure and the foundation for the large-scale application of AI + Web3 in the future.

For those of us who have been struggling in Crypto, understanding the importance of these underlying protocols is much more reliable than chasing after short-term trends. This thing is the key to truly making AI Agents 'live' in the Web3 world. #mcp
$GRT
$NEAR

ETH owes no one anything!

From 2021 to 2026, the prices of Bitcoin and Ethereum have barely moved, and even experienced slight pullbacks. But just look at Solana, which has halved. In these five years, the market has changed dramatically, many projects have gone to zero, and many beliefs have collapsed. It is already quite difficult for ETH to remain stable. It may not be the flashiest, but it is definitely the most reliable.

Take a moment to think, where does true value lie? #全球市场波动 $ETH
$BTC
$SOL

Brothers, if you're still staring at the K-line chart, you must read this post to the end——
Saudi Arabia has made a big move again, with the daily transportation capacity of the east-west oil pipeline directly reaching 7 million barrels. This number is a bit outrageous. The key is that this thing can bypass the Strait of Hormuz. Think about it, what does this mean? The geopolitical tension has thickened a layer. The Strait of Hormuz used to be a choke point; whoever controls it is powerful. Now Saudi Arabia has left themselves a way out, which is no small matter.

I might be wrong, but I feel that the impact of this on the energy market is something that those who understand will understand. If oil prices surge again, the global economy will definitely be affected. What about our Crypto circle? Many people think the crypto market is independent of traditional finance, but to be honest, every time the macro environment changes, aren’t we small retail investors all being pressed down? The time I faced liquidation was because of a sudden shift in the macro environment—I simply didn’t react in time. Now, Saudi Arabia's move is telling the whole world that they have the capability to deal with extreme situations, but conversely, it might also mean they've anticipated some extreme situation. This is quite interesting.

So brothers, don’t just watch the rise and fall of coin prices; such big geopolitical news is what can truly determine the thickness of your wallet. Risk warning must be sincere; in times like this, position management is more important than anything else, don’t be stubborn.

What do you think, is Saudi Arabia's move purely a commercial layout, or are they preparing for a bigger geopolitical conflict? Is this matter a benefit or a detriment to the coins in our hands? #霍尔木茨海峡

Brothers, I found an interesting piece of data—Bitcoin Magazine shared a chart saying BTC is following the trajectory of gold, suggesting a significant rise. I don't know if it's a coincidence, but I feel it's not that simple.

Recently, Bitcoin Magazine released a chart comparing the historical trends of Bitcoin and gold, and the meaning is clear; they want to say that Bitcoin is now like gold back in the day, poised for a major rise. This narrative of 'digital gold' has resurfaced.

To be honest, whether Bitcoin is truly digital gold is something I have pondered for three years. It has the scarcity of gold and the potential to resist inflation; that's all valid. But gold has thousands of years of history, while Bitcoin has only been around for over a decade; their scale and audience are not on the same level. Gold is a safe-haven asset, while many still see Bitcoin as a high-risk speculative product.

You reflect on it, you really reflect on it. If it were to completely follow gold, it would require global consensus, not something determined by a single chart. I'm not bragging, but I was too trusting of such 'comparisons' back then and got slapped in the face for it. When market sentiment rises, any chart analysis could turn into 'faith recharge'. Now saying it will soar has some substance, but it also seems a bit absurd.

So, brothers, when you see such charts, you can have a bit of hope in your heart, but don't get carried away. Gold's rise might be completed by Bitcoin in just a few months, but gold's stability is something Bitcoin might not have. Risk warnings must be sincere; don't just look at the thief eating meat without seeing the thief getting beaten. I may be wrong, but I believe that in this current market, staying clear-headed is more important than anything else.

Do you think Bitcoin can really completely replicate the trend of gold? Or will it chart a completely different path?
$BTC #BTC行情

What if there is a dog sitting in front of the White House desk? Would the US-Iran war be like this? #美伊和谈陷僵局

General: "Quick, bring me my Estée Lauder." 😂
If you encounter the following male models at KTV, which one would you choose? Or would you choose none?

A couple of days ago, I was chatting with a friend who just entered the space. He asked me why sometimes when buying coins on DEX, the price looks good, but the actual transaction price is far off. I couldn't help but laugh; isn't this a typical case of being 'robbed' by the 'highway toll collector'?

Imagine our blockchain as a busy highway, with various cars (which are your transactions) driving on it. The toll booths on this highway (which are the validators or miners) are not ordinary toll collectors.

For example, when you see a coin price about to rise, you quickly drive to buy it. As soon as your transaction information arrives at the toll booth, the 'toll collector' sees that you want to buy, and he thinks, 'Hey, this guy is going to buy, so it must be going up!' He immediately cuts in front of you and buys first, and once you push the price up with your purchase, he sells his car and makes a profit. Isn't this blatant 'queue-jumping arbitrage'? This is what’s known as MEV (Maximal Extractable Value); it's not a bug but a 'feature' of the blockchain's underlying mechanism.

They gain extra profit by adjusting the order of transactions or inserting their own transactions before or after yours. The most common examples are 'sandwich attacks' (buying before you buy and selling after you buy) or 'front-running' (seeing a large order come in and buying ahead of it).

So how can we newbies defend ourselves?
1. Don't blindly chase high prices and panic sell: Especially with small coins, low liquidity makes it easier to be attacked by MEV.
2. Set reasonable slippage: Don't set the slippage too high just to grab that tiny bit of price; it gives the 'toll collector' more room for arbitrage.
3. Use DEX aggregators: Some aggregators help you find the optimal path and even split your transactions into smaller parts, reducing the risk of MEV attacks.
4. Split large transactions into batches: Going all in at once, with a clear target, makes you an easy target.

Keyword summary: MEV is the behavior of miners/validators extracting extra profits from on-chain transactions by manipulating transaction order. Those who understand, understand; those who don’t, well, you’ve learned something today.
Have you ever been caught by MEV? Or do you have any exclusive prevention tips? Let’s chat in the comments!
#MEV

Latest news: The U.S. Treasury Department announced that starting this year, future issues of U.S. banknotes will feature President Trump's signature, and for the first time, the signature of the Secretary of the Treasury will be removed.
This will be the first time in American history that a sitting president appears on banknotes.
This move commemorates the 250th anniversary of the founding of 🇺🇸 the United States.
Long live Emperor Trump! Hahaha.🤷
What do you think?

Trump: Have you all bought it? I'm about to start talking. #特朗普称对伊战争已胜利

I just saw a message,——币安直接下场整治主动做市商了. Brothers, what do you think about this matter?

To be honest, I just saw the drop of $SIREN yesterday, and I was directly stunned. Just a few days ago, this guy was doing great, but overnight it experienced a high dive, plummeting over 30%. At that time, I was thinking that there must be something fishy behind this. Sure enough, today it was revealed that Binance is going to crack down on proactive market makers. Think about it, this is clearly telling us that there are manipulators involved, and they are playing it a bit too hard, to the point that even the platform can't stand it, right?

I might be wrong, but I feel that this matter reflects an old problem in the entire crypto market: are market makers really "providing liquidity" or "manipulating the market"? Many times, they just take advantage of information asymmetry and funding advantages, treating retail investors like chives to be cut. This time, regarding $SIREN , it is estimated that the market makers messed up, or rather, their actions were too ugly, provoking public outrage.

Of course, Binance's crackdown may be a good thing for us retail investors in the short term, at least it can make those unscrupulous manipulators restrain a bit. But in the long run, this kind of "cat-and-mouse game" will continue. What we can do is keep our eyes open, don't blindly follow the trend, especially with those coins that experience short-term skyrocketing and plummeting; the risks are really a bit outrageous.

What do you think? Is Binance's move this time genuinely aimed at maintaining market fairness, or is it just for show? Should the behavior of market makers be severely punished? Let's discuss your views in the comments!
$SIREN

Brothers, last night in this market, I can only say—there's something going on! While you're still in dreamland, the AI track has already put on a performance of "high diving," and Bitcoin has also dropped below $66,000. Isn't this script a bit outrageous?

To be honest, this overnight pullback really caught a lot of people off guard. Bitcoin once dipped to around $66,000, and the US stock market was also a sea of red, with crypto-related stocks falling by 5%-10%. The worst hit was the AI sector, which overall dropped nearly 8%! The previously soaring $SIREN directly fell from the clouds, dropping nearly 30% in 24 hours. Behind this, Binance stepped in to regulate and actively manage market makers. Just think about it, how deep is this water? $WLD also dropped over 8%, and for the leading $TAO, although still at a high level, it seems to be showing signs of technical risk accumulation.

Additionally, there's another thing: the P2P.me team admitted to using foundation funds to gamble on fundraising results on Polymarket. This operation is simply rubbing trust in the dirt. California quickly introduced policies to prohibit officials from profiting in prediction markets using non-public information. What does this indicate? It indicates that this circle is always filled with risky operations and always has regulatory eyes watching closely.

However, there are some bright spots. News from Morgan Stanley suggests they are planning to create a Bitcoin ETF with a fee as low as 0.14%. If this becomes a reality, it will definitely be the market's lowest price, and the attraction for institutional funds is unimaginable. Also, mining company $MARA surprisingly started selling Bitcoin to invest in AI infrastructure. Isn't this clearly telling you that computing power equals power, and AI is the future?

What am I watching today?
•$SIREN: The market maker game of this asset is not over yet. Let's see what actions Binance takes next; the interest chain involved seems interesting.
•$MARA: Mining companies transitioning to AI is a trend worth digging into. The rhythm of its coin sales and the progress of AI investments could be the next narrative breakout point.
•$SUDO: It surged by 225% yesterday due to a liquidation dividend proposal. This kind of "good news exhausted" coin—should it continue to rise or pull back? It needs careful observation.
What do you think about this pullback? Is it a bottom-fishing opportunity or a continued decline? Let's discuss your views in the comments!
$BTC
$ETH
$SIREN