熊什么猫

I just finished reading Citrini's report, and I have some thoughts I want to discuss regarding the Stable

Because everyone should have a sense of this direction with Agent; AI has evolved from chatting to being able to work independently. It can help you place orders, compare prices, and handle tasks without needing a person to constantly monitor.

But to be honest, I had not considered that there would be such a significant issue with payments.

The current payment logic is still designed according to human habits. For example, when you transfer using USDC, you have to pay Gas with ETH. For people, it’s not a big deal; if it gets stuck, just add a bit more. But Agent is different; if it runs out of ETH halfway through execution, the program just stops, and that's not just a hassle; it’s fundamentally unmanageable.

💊 The report places Stable at the core of Agent's payment infrastructure

On the chain with #stable , it’s equivalent to using USDT simultaneously for both transfers and Gas, one coin from start to finish. This way, Agent doesn’t have to worry about whether there is enough Gas; the cost is stable, and it can just be calculated in dollars.

What Stable does is precisely what the Agentic economy truly needs.

The most talked-about event recently in the circle is the official launch of Chain Genesis, followed by World Liberty Fi jumping directly to #Aster to start making moves.

I looked through the messages they sent, and this time it feels different. It’s not the usual routine; it’s more like playing a game of chess, with spot trading, contracts, incentives, and collateral all intertwined. Moreover, USD1's integration this time with Aster essentially revolves around three key points:

🔸 Trade to earn $WLFI rewards:

Now, trading perpetual contracts like BTC/USD1, ETH/USD1, and SOL/USD1, there are 2.5 million $WLFI tokens available each month for distribution. I took a special look, and the rewards are distributed weekly, so you don’t have to wait several months like with some projects to see any action. It is said that there will be more than a dozen trading pairs added later, so those interested can keep an eye on it.

🔸 Holding also brings profits:

If you don’t want to deal with contracts and just hold USD1 on Aster, you can still join their incentive program, earning rewards daily based on your holding proportion. I think this is quite clever, turning stablecoins into something that can earn interest, which is indeed attractive for those who don’t want to operate frequently and just want to hold without devaluation.

🔸 The fees are indeed low to a harsh degree:

The Taker fee for the USD1 trading pair is only 0.5 bps, while the Maker fee is directly 0, and the Taker fee for USDT pairs is 4 bps. You can calculate the difference yourself. More importantly, USD1 can now be used as margin, with permissions on par with USDT, indicating that the platform is genuinely pushing it seriously.

In summary, this time the appearance of #USD1 on Aster feels more like the beginning of a deeply integrated ecosystem. It attempts to establish USD1 as the gold standard asset on the Aster chain through a combination of low thresholds (low fees), high returns (WLFI incentives), and multifunctionality (collateralizable, interest-earning).

If you have USD1 on hand or are preparing to enter the market, now is a good observation window. After all, early participation often comes with higher potential returns.

Of course, as always, the above is just my personal analysis and interpretation, not investment advice. Make sure to do your homework #DYOR before entering and understand the risks.

Recently, I watched a round of discussions about AI Agents and stablecoins, and indeed, the main character in payments has changed.

Imagine, if in the future, buying things and ordering services are all handled by AI, then the way we pay will certainly have to change.

Before, it was operated by people: opening a webpage, selecting items, clicking on payment, entering passwords. But with the Agentic commerce model, the scene has changed: AI helps you find services, automatically compares prices, and then directly makes the payment.

With this change, problems have arisen. Many machine services are charged on a per-use basis, a few cents for calling an API, a few cents for running computational power. These small transactions using traditional payment methods may incur fees higher than the actual consumption, which doesn't make sense.

At this point, looking at stablecoins aligns perfectly: they are quick to arrive, available 7x24 hours, and can support payments of a few cents, making them tailor-made for machine transactions. However, saying that stablecoins will replace credit cards is not very realistic. The foundation built by credit cards over the years, including refunds, risk control, and consumer protection, is extremely effective in e-commerce and daily consumption.

The places where stablecoins can really take off should be in the machine economy: those increasingly numerous API services, AI tools, and automated software, simply put:

➤ Traditional payments solve transactions between people and merchants,
➤ Stablecoins fill the gap for transactions between machines.

If AI Agents truly participate in commercial activities on a large scale, then stablecoins are very likely to gradually become the settlement tool at the core of this system.

🦅 Recently, USD1 has been discussed a lot, but I think many people are actually missing the point.

What USD1 is really doing is redoing the payment and transfer process. It's not for traders; it's for people who really need to use money in their daily lives. The reality is well understood: cross-border transfers are slow, fees are high, and in places where local currency is unstable, money simply cannot be kept. For many people, using stablecoins is not a choice, but a necessity.

The idea behind #USD1 is that transfers must be fast, costs must be low, and cross-border transactions should be the default. On the BNB Chain, there are no fees directly, which is crucial. You're just transferring money; you shouldn't be charged repeatedly.

So you'll see more and more real scenarios starting to use stablecoins for settlement. This is not just a concept; it's about efficiency. Paying suppliers, settling accounts, doing cross-border business—if the money can arrive the same day, no one wants to wait for the bank.

This also explains why USD1 has grown so fast recently. In just 4 days, the volume surged to 5 billion USD, clearly not driven by emotions.

🔥 Moreover, the USD1 points activity for #Binance is essentially amplifying real usage rather than just a pump:

➤ One part is basic tasks that everyone can participate in: in the designated USD1 trading pairs, trading equivalent to 500 USD gives you a chance to receive WLFI rewards, with a total prize pool of 3 million $WLFI , limited spots available, it's the kind of early participation that brings early benefits.

➤ The other part is a leaderboard prepared for active trading users: if the trading volume exceeds 1000 USD, you will enter the points ranking, dividing the remaining 9 million WLFI according to your rank; doing more and ranking higher naturally yields greater rewards, with a maximum of 12000 $WLFI .

📅 The entire activity runs from January 29 to February 27, which is essentially encouraging real trading and liquidity.

In my own view, the real opportunity for stablecoins is not in exchanges, but in the most unassuming areas such as payments, remittances, and daily transfers. Those who can successfully navigate these scenarios will truly retain users.

#WLFI

Irys: Turning data from static storage into executable assets

I recently revisited the materials on @irys several times, and the more I look, the more I feel that its focus is not on long-term storage, but on making data come alive.

In the past, when we talked about data on the blockchain, it was more of an archival mindset, and just putting files on Arweave or IPFS was the end of it. But Irys's logic is completely different; it allows data not only to be stored but also to be executed, called upon, and even directly participate in logic.

In other words, data has transformed from static resources into programmable assets. This means that AI agents can directly read and write data, smart contracts can automatically execute copyright logic, and games and social applications can run states and rules on the same chain simultaneously.

In terms of performance and cost, Irys seems to be rewriting the rules. Permanent storage is over a dozen times cheaper than Arweave and several orders of magnitude lower than Ethereum; the testnet can even achieve 100,000 TPS. This turns the concept of data as an asset from an ideal into a reality.

What I value more is its architectural thinking, which connects the data layer with the execution layer. There is no need for additional oracles, no need to change languages; developers can directly build complex logic in the EVM environment using Solidity. This smooth experience almost brings Web3 back to pure creativity. #KAITO

In my opinion, #Irys no longer belongs to the pure storage track; it is more like the data engine for the next generation of AI and autonomous applications. As more and more projects rely on high-quality, executable on-chain data in the future, Irys is likely to be that quiet yet crucial underlying gear.

For a long time, #UXLINK has attracted quite a few people's attention. I checked the latest progress released by the official @UXLINK Official and thought it was worth mentioning.

Recently, the market has been quite volatile, and there are also many external technical issues. However, looking at it, the social infrastructure of UXLINK is still quite stable. Whether it is the Social Growth Layer, RWS protocol, user relationship network, or asset security, all remain unaffected.

On the contrary, the number of users is still increasing, and it has surprisingly reached 54 million. I think this growth is quite exaggerated, indicating that its social model is indeed working.

To be honest, the logic behind UXLINK is quite valid. It is not the traditional project that makes money through social connections; rather, it treats social relationships as a distribution channel. It uses trust to drive the growth of Web3 applications. Unlike Facebook and WeChat in the Web2 era, which connect people, UXLINK connects projects and real users through trust relationships, which is quite innovative.

I personally think this model is really smart and aligns well with the current rhythm of Web3. After all, there are too many new projects now, and most lack ways to bring real users in. UXLINK uses social trust for distribution, which essentially puts people back at the center of Web3.

Additionally, they mentioned that there will be airdrops and buyback plans in the future, allowing community users to participate in the growth and profit distribution of the project together. I think this design is a plus, much more reliable than many projects that just shout concepts.

Overall, what UXLINK aims to create is a foundational facility that is safe, trustworthy, and can drive the growth of the entire ecosystem. The direction is quite stable, and I am looking forward to its upcoming actions.

#社交基础设施 #RWA #Stablecoin