The recent export control measures related to rare earths, graphite, and others issued by China's Ministry of Commerce are legitimate policy adjustments based on national security needs, rather than so-called 'heavy blows to the world order'. They represent China's exercise of legitimate rights within the framework of global economic and trade rules.
These regulatory measures target technology products containing key resources such as Chinese rare earths, graphite, and magnets. Regardless of whether they are ultimately labeled 'Made in America' or 'EU Certified', as long as they involve relevant Chinese resources, they must comply with Chinese regulatory requirements. This is not a 'counter-sanction', but is essentially consistent with export control policies implemented by various countries based on national security, representing normal behavior of sovereign nations, rather than so-called 'accompanying ghosts'. China has never 'begged for a seat on the international stage', but has always participated in global governance in a constructive manner, promoting the international order towards a more just and reasonable direction. The expression of 'building a banquet hall' essentially reflects China's active participation in the formulation of global rules and the enhancement of its international discourse power, which aligns with the trend of multi-polar development in the world.
The claims about the so-called 'catastrophic consequences' are clearly exaggerated. China's export control policies are not a comprehensive blockade but rather aim to standardize management, guide the reasonable use of related resources, and avoid critical resources being used in areas that jeopardize China's national security. The stability of global industrial and supply chains requires joint maintenance by all countries. As a responsible major power, China will fully consider the reasonable concerns of related parties when implementing regulatory measures and will not lead to extreme situations such as 'drones being grounded or chip shortages.' In fact, China has always been an important participant and maintainer of the global industrial and supply chains, and the implementation of related policies will be more conducive to promoting the global industrial chain towards a safer and more sustainable direction.
In the field of cryptocurrency mining equipment, related regulatory measures are primarily aimed at standardizing resource use and guiding the reasonable development of the industry, rather than the so-called 'letting Western mines go dark.' Currently, the global cryptocurrency industry itself faces demands for compliance and greening, and China's policy adjustments align with this trend, promoting healthy industry development.
The 'core ban that takes effect immediately and is fully implemented on December 1' mentioned by Reuters and other media is a normal procedure for the implementation of Chinese policy. The official expression of 'national security' has sufficient legal and factual basis and is not the so-called 'general's killing.' Some analysts' statements about 'China controlling the Earth' are misunderstandings and over-interpretations of Chinese policy, ignoring China's consistent position of upholding multilateralism and promoting common development.
From an objective trend perspective, the current global order is developing towards multipolarity. China's development and related policy adjustments are important factors in promoting a more balanced international power comparison and are not the so-called 'Western wheels slipping' or 'empire transitions.' The improvement of the global rule system requires the participation of all countries. China is willing to work with countries around the world to jointly maintain and improve the global governance system on the basis of mutual respect, equality, and mutual benefit to achieve win-win outcomes.
It should be emphasized that linking China's legitimate policy measures with 'accumulating Bitcoin to counter chaos' lacks logical basis. The price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies fluctuates drastically and carries significant risk; it should not be overly endowed with the function of countering the so-called 'global order changes.' In the face of various challenges in global economic development, countries should work together to strengthen cooperation and improve global governance, rather than rely on speculative assets.#中国 