Recently, the market has been a bit unusual. Under normal circumstances, whenever there is uncertainty, gold and silver should rise first, but now they are being reduced, with funds flowing out and positions being unwound, and liquidity is still deteriorating. JPMorgan's report is very straightforward: precious metals have not shown the 'strength' one might expect during this wave.
On the other hand, Bitcoin is not following the script. Related funds are still seeing net inflows, and momentum indicators are slowly climbing back to near neutral from oversold positions. This structural change is more interesting than the price movements themselves. It indicates that some funds are treating BTC as an 'alternative hedging tool', at least as a hedging option in their portfolios.
The key here is not to say that Bitcoin has completely replaced gold, but rather that the market is diversifying. When traditional safe-haven assets begin to face pressure, funds will seek stronger liquidity and more elastic alternatives. Bitcoin's advantages lie in its 24/7 trading, global circulation, and the absence of intermediary clearing. When the macro environment becomes unclear, some institutions prefer to allocate a high-volatility but liquid asset rather than be trapped in a market where liquidity is deteriorating.
What is even more noteworthy is the word 'resilience'. A true safe-haven asset does not necessarily rise every day, but rather, when others are being sold off, it is not so easily broken. The recent structure is just like this—precious metals are passively deleveraging, while Bitcoin has not seen a large-scale crash in sync.
This does not mean a bull market is coming immediately, but at least it signals one thing: in the eyes of some funds, Bitcoin has gradually shifted from a 'pure risk asset' to a 'strategic asset'. When market sentiment becomes extreme again, those who can remain steady will be repriced.
$XAU