Disclaimer: In compliance with MiCA requirements, unauthorized stablecoins are subject to certain restrictions for EEA users. For more information, please click here.
Delta Neutral Accounts are introduced to enhance the trading experience for users running Delta Neutral strategies. Eligible Delta Neutral Accounts will have a lower ADL ranking than the other accounts for the hedged positions for USDⓈ and Coin Margin Futures.
Delta neutrality is evaluated for each Delta Neutral Account by comparing the total delta of long positions/assets and the total delta of short positions/assets of the same underlier. It isn’t affected by any other risk metrics, including (but not limited to) collateral requirements, calculations of liquidation thresholds.
To qualify as a Delta Neutral Account, an account must meet all of the following requirements:
1. Portfolio Margin (PM) or Portfolio Margin (PM) Pro;
2. VIP 4 and above;
3. Delta Neutral threshold ‘relative_diff’ < 0.05
4. Delta Mode is enabled
POST /sapi/v1/portfolio/delta-mode
GET /sapi/v1/portfolio/delta-mode
For all assets and positions of the underlier (e.g. BTC, ETH):
(UM = USDS Margin Futures; CM = Coin-Margin Futures)
Please note: ETHBTC Futures position cannot hedge with any other positions/assets.
Only the below can be used for hedging:
So assets in Spot Account and Option positions cannot be used for hedging.
No, there is no latency impact in any aspect.
No, it is not necessary.
No change if it drops below VIP4, but if PM is disabled the Delta Mode will be disabled too.
Yes, in calculating ‘relative_diff’, BNSOL in Cross Margin Account will be converted to SOL and WBETH to ETH using the relevant index prices. Use GET /sapi/v1/portfolio/asset-index-price to query the index prices used for conversion.
Case study:
1. ADL ranking before the change:
| Account type | VIP Level | Delta mode | relative_diff | Delta Neutral | |
| User 1 | PM Pro | 9 | enabled | < 0.05 | Yes |
| User 2 | PM Pro | 9 | enabled | > 0.05 | No |
| User 3 | PM | 6 | not enabled | N/A | No |
| User 4 | PM | 4 | enabled | < 0.05 | Yes |
| User 5 | Regular | 1 | not enabled | N/A | No |
2. ADL ranking after the change:
| Account type | VIP Level | Delta mode | relative_diff | Delta Neutral | |
| User 2 | PM Pro | 9 | enabled | > 0.05 | No |
| User 3 | PM | 6 | not enabled | N/A | No |
| User 5 | Regular | 1 | not enabled | N/A | No |
| User 1 | PM Pro | 9 | enabled | < 0.05 | Yes |
| User 4 | PM | 4 | enabled | < 0.05 | Yes |
3. How to calculate ‘relative_diff’ for BTCUSDT:
| Cross Margin Balance | Cross Margin Debt | UM Position | CM Position | UM Balance | CM Balance | |
| User 1 | 1 BTC | 0.3 BTC | -0.5 BTCUSDT | 100 BTCUSD_PERP | 0.1 BTC | -0.4 BTC |
| User 2 | 2 BTC | 3 BTC | 0.7 BTCUSDT | -300 BTCUSD_PERP | 0.3 BTC | -3.5 BTC |
Note: The case study assumes that BTCUSD_PERP‘s entry price is 100,000.
For user 1:
For user 2:
Summary:
In the example above, both User 1 and User 2 have enabled Delta Mode. However, only User 1 meets the ‘relative_diff’ threshold, and is therefore ranked after User 2/3/5 who are not Delta Neutral. User 5 and User 1 both meet the threshold, but User 5 is still ranked after User 1 following the same logic as before.