You've seen a few $60 ones in the past two months, nonsense, not blinking an eye.

🔥The new regulations have taken effect, and the "opportunity" for studios has been completely opened up!
Let's first analyze the mainstream gameplay and costs:
· 2+17 gets 19 points, monthly investment around $240, can aim for 285 points for core rewards
· 2+16 gets 18 points, monthly cost around $100, stable at 270 points
· 2+15 gets 17 points, monthly cost about $50, netting 255 points — already the studio's first choice
· 2+14 gets 16 points, monthly spend $23, accumulating 240 points
· 1+15 also gets 16 points, excellent cost-performance ratio, suitable for bulk operations

If the threshold is set at 220 points, estimating around $60 for each airdrop:
· 285 points configuration can receive 6 times → earn about $360
· 270 points configuration can receive 4 times → earn about $140
· 255 points configuration can receive 4 times → earn about $190
· 240 points configuration can receive 2 times → earn about $100
· 1+15 configuration can receive 2 times → earn about $70 (the single number limit can even reach $500)

In fact, setting the threshold at 220 or 240 points makes little difference to studios, and may inadvertently harm ordinary players... The new regulations increase the deduction for receiving points, superficially tightening the rules, but in reality may make it easier for studios to monopolize high-score rewards, while retail investors struggle more.

If the single airdrop remains stable at around $60 for a long time, studios will likely quickly push the threshold above 240 points, further squeezing retail investors' resources. In the future, trying to "just grab a reward" may become increasingly difficult.

Ultimately, the original intention of the rules may be fairness, but the practical effect could become "the winner takes all." It is recommended that the project team pay more attention to score inflation and ecological balance, so that good rules don't lose their essence!⚠️
$ETH $Q $OOOO #Alpha
#空投大毛 #空投零噜分享