I have always been amazed at how easily we confuse the concepts of “verification” and “truth.” The blockchain industry promised us trust, but instead delivered only perfect reports.

I look at the certifications in Sign Scan and see a trap in this.

Sign Protocol guarantees that the data has not been altered after signing. It records the integrity of each byte. But it has no idea whether this data was unreliable data even at the moment of creation.

It’s like getting a notarized copy of a passport with unreliable data. The notary honestly confirmed that the copy matches the original. But did that make the passport genuine?

I see how we have automated auditing, but left the front door open for garbage.

Now I care little about seeing the status confirmed. I am looking for not the certification itself, but for who issued it. Because a signature is just proof that someone said something on the network.

Without understanding the reputation of the issuer, any certification is just a beautifully crafted illusion.

#SignDigitalSovereignInfra $SIGN @SignOfficial

SIGN
SIGN
0.03219
+0.28%