Most people still treat token distribution like it is just a growth tactic. I do not really see SIGN that way.
What makes it interesting to me is the mix of credential verification and token distribution in one system. That changes the conversation. In crypto, sending tokens is the easy part. The hard part is knowing who should actually receive them, under what conditions, and with enough proof that the process does not turn into noise, sybil farming, or pure discretion.
That is why SIGN feels more important than it first appears. It is not only about moving tokens faster. It is about making distribution more precise. If that becomes a real piece of onchain infrastructure, the value could run deeper than the usual narrative around launches and incentives.
But that is also where the open question is. Does value stay with the verification layer, or does it get absorbed by the applications using it? For me, that is the part worth thinking about. Not the headline, not the pitch, just where the real leverage ends up sitting.