My take on ,Can SIGN Token support large-scale benefit programs with fewer manual intermediaries? :
My own view is that large-scale benefit programs do not break down mainly because money is missing. They break down because trust gets rebuilt over and over by different offices, reviewers, and intermediaries before support actually reaches someone.
That is why SIGN stands out to me. On the surface, it may look like a token attached to digital infrastructure. But I think the more important layer is the verification design underneath it. If eligibility, approvals, and payout conditions can all sit on one shared, verifiable record, then the process no longer depends on so many manual handoffs. In theory, that makes distribution cleaner and faster.
My hesitation is that public systems are never fully neat. Edge cases, disputes, and policy changes are normal. So for SIGN, the real test is not just reducing intermediaries. It is whether the system can stay flexible without losing accountability.
@SignOfficial $SIGN #SignDigitalSovereignInfra