Most on-chain signatures are treated as permanent by default, but that assumption is being actively challenged. After looking closely at systems like Sign Protocol, revocation doesn’t feel optional—it’s foundational. The protocol’s attestation model allows issuers to define revocation authority and conditions at the schema level, creating a programmable balance between permanence and flexibility. Recent updates emphasize clearer on-chain revocation logs and role-based control, while $SIGN aligns incentives by pricing attestations and updates. In a cycle where identity, RWA, and compliance are converging, this matters because rigid signatures fail under real-world conditions. @SignOfficial $SIGN #SignDigitalSovereignInfra