I’ll be honest, I initially lumped @SignOfficial into the usual DID narrative and moved on. Felt crowded, low urgency. But digging deeper, something didn’t sit right with that take. This isn’t just identity… it’s structured verification infra.

At its core, #SignDigitalSovereignInfra is basically an attestation machine. Issuers create verifiable credentials tied to DIDs, everything anchored with schemas and tracked in a trust registry. In practice, it’s like a shared database of “who verified what” that institutions can actually rely on.

Market still prices it like optional infra. I think that’s the mistake. The real question is whether adoption justifies token pressure. I’m watching that closely.

$SIGN

SIGNUSDT

Perp

0.03199

-0.31%

How should we view Sign Protocol?