My great-uncle opened a hardware store in our hometown. On the day of the grand opening, he stood at the street corner with two buckets of salad oil, offering it for free to anyone who registered as a member. Once the oil ran out, the ladies turned around and blocked him. This kind of spending money to make a noise is particularly familiar to me; isn't a lot of projects in the cryptocurrency space doing exactly this with airdrops? Following this incident, I wanted to dig deeper into the Sign Protocol's hidden cards. After all, that community incentive pool accounts for 40% of the total supply. How many people are really working after the TGE?

I specifically went to check its total 10 billion supply, and the TGE wave directly released 10%. To be honest, I was quite nervous at first; such a large amount of liquidity might easily turn into a cash-out machine for speculators. But as I followed the clues, I looked into the on-chain activities of the SignX hackathon and discovered that their TokenTable's pre-validation is quite interesting. As a developer, it’s not so easy to just hang a name to get money; you have to rigorously run this validation protocol in real business scenarios. This way of tying the rewards tightly to actual work, I reckon, will definitely clean out those who only know how to write superficial code to scam subsidies.

Recently, they accurately directed chips to self-custody users. In plain language, they are forcing developers to comply with real validation needs. This is similar to how my great-uncle learned from his losses; he changed the rule to give a small wrench only when the purchase of hardware items exceeded fifty yuan, and as a result, repeat customers increased. Can the large pool held in @SignOfficial truly establish a foothold in this new cycle on Binance? It all depends on whether their strategy of "not releasing the eagle without seeing the rabbit" can firmly tie those sharp-eyed developers to their territory. #sign地缘政治基建 $SIGN