#sign地缘政治基建 $SIGN are discussing which countries Sign has taken down, and I am curious about one thing – after the sovereign chain gets running, what new jobs will it create?

After flipping through its Sovereign Layer 2 Stack documentation, the more I look, the more interesting it becomes.

The technology itself isn’t anything to brag about, the opBNB modified, can run Hyperledger Fabric, this approach is not lacking in the market. What really caught me off guard is the ecological niche it occupies – it’s not about helping countries 'issue currency', but about helping countries 'put a verifiable ledger on the issuance of currency'.

When the Kyrgyzstan deal was signed, CZ stood on stage, and Sierra Leone directly wants to use it for digital identity + cCBDC dual track, think about that. What does this mean? It means that in the future there will be a group of people specifically eating the 'sovereign chain audit' rice bowl – previously auditing Excel, and in the future auditing the matching degree of on-chain proofs and fund flows.

There’s also the matter of mutual recognition of cross-border proofs, if Country A issues a VC, will Country B recognize it? If not, who arbitrates? The service layer that can grow out of this is much more attractive than just simply trading coins, right?

Don’t just stare at the K-line asking 'why isn’t it rising', think about what new professions will emerge when this thing really gets going. I, for one, am just waiting. @SignOfficial