I feel like I've seen through it. Those doing DID (Decentralized Identity) in the market are basically just self-indulging in their ivory towers. Everyone is pecking at each other in the limited KYC market on the chain. If you really want to expand your business to ports in Bahrain or Riyadh, you'll find that taking the so-called universal identity template to negotiate on the ground is purely creating difficulties for local regulators. The deep waters of international trade have never been about proving 'who I am,' but rather proving 'I am qualified to do this.' Compared a few leading identity projects, Worldcoin's biometric approach is purely self-inflicted pain in heavily regulated areas, while Polygon ID is too developer-centric, unable to manage complex commercial logic. Sign's approach is indeed much more ruthless than these idealists; it didn't stubbornly pursue the elusive concept of 'digital citizen,' but rather directly cut into Attestation (proof services). It attempts to make sovereign certification into a set of desensitized on-chain certificates, compressing what would originally take a week of manual review into seconds, which has indeed caught the attention of many financial institutions. However, after reviewing its technical plan, I still feel that some parts are written too much from a 'programmer's mindset.' Especially that dispute resolution contract, the logic is too rigid. In real-world bulk trade, there are plenty of gray areas, such as credit extensions due to force majeure or loss assessment of non-standard products, which are filled with soft constraints of commercial practice. The current Solidity code struggles to accurately capture these. If localized rules cannot be 'fed' into the system during implementation, then the so-called efficiency gains become a joke in the face of complex breach determinations. This kind of geostrategic infrastructure is never about how stunning the code is but about who can first grind down the thick barriers of regulators. My attitude remains very cold; this thing is not a hype-driven air token, its lifeline is entirely dependent on the penetration rates in hubs like the UAE or Qatar. Rather than looking for comfort in those few red and green columns, I would prefer to check its actual progress at local compliance nodes. If there is no substantial entry of local large B-end players within six months, it will likely become a footnote of 'strong technology but no one uses it.' @SignOfficial $SIGN #Sign地缘政治基建