I think many people overlook a problem:

Social collaboration and organizational structure is an extremely complex system.

Now, the 'One Person Company' (OPC)

is not much different from the 'mass entrepreneurship and innovation' around 2015.

Starting a business without considering the business model will ultimately lead to a mess.

The greater probability in the future is not that 'One Person Companies' will bloom everywhere, but rather that more people will be unemployed.

AI does not replace jobs; it replaces nodes in the chain of socialized collaboration. When a large company starts using AI to cut out the middle layers, those who are released will not automatically become the bosses of 'One Person Companies', but rather become people without income.

There will definitely be a small group of people who can successfully run the 'One Person Company' model. For example:

- Tech wizards who create products alone and live on subscription income or sell to large companies, such as OpenClaw.

- Super individuals who take orders based on personal branding, with extremely high profit margins, such as self-media and influential figures.

But this is just like 'mass entrepreneurship': what you see are the survivors; no one mentions those who died within three months.

In the context of the significant productivity improvement brought by AI large models and high-performance robots, the tools have become stronger, but the speed of iteration has become faster, and the life cycle shorter.

The biggest pitfall of 'One Person Companies' is: it leads us to believe that we can succeed without dealing with complex systems. But the real world has never operated this way.