Everyone keeps treating SIGN like it’s just about identity, but that misses where it’s actually going. It’s starting to behave more like an evidence layer systems can lean on when they need to prove something under real scrutiny, not just claim it.
In cross-border flows or infrastructure, loose data doesn’t hold up anymore. What matters is verifiable records tied to a real issuer that can travel without losing meaning.
What stands out to me is how apps might stop storing everything themselves. Instead, they’ll reference signed data that already exists and is trusted across environments. That shift quietly changes how accountability works, not at the user level, but at the system level.
Feels like the kind of layer that only becomes obvious once pressure hits. Even narratives like @Dogecoin show how fast attention can move, but infrastructure like SIGN is what holds when things get serious.