The United States has just discovered that it has been badly deceived by Israel!
Excerpt from Historical Attitude by Tao Ran
On March 27, 2026, AIXOS News reported that Vance had a heated argument with Netanyahu during a phone call.
Vance criticized Netanyahu, saying he was "too optimistic in predicting the U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict and exaggerated the possibility of regime change in Iran."
This means Israel is in trouble, and the White House is starting to realize whether it has been tricked by Netanyahu.
Regarding this war, Vance has long been recognized as an "anti-war faction" and strongly opposes going to war with Iran.
He was even reprimanded by Trump for this.
However, on March 25, Trump suddenly agreed to send Vance to Pakistan to lead talks with Iran. That’s how the phone call between Vance and Netanyahu came about; the U.S. and Israel needed to synchronize their messages before the negotiations.
On the surface, it was Vance leading the talks at Iran's request.
In reality, if Trump had disagreed, Vance could not have led the talks, and that phone call wouldn't have happened.
Iran chose Vance over Whitakoff and Kushner because they valued Vance’s anti-war stance. Trump knew this well; agreeing to Iran’s request indicated a problem.
We know that Israel's external propaganda is very powerful, leading the whole world to believe that Iran is weak and just a crumbling house that will collapse with a kick.
Trump believed it too, thinking he could easily rake in a lot of spoils, just like in Venezuela.
No one expected such big trouble; U.S. military bases in the Gulf region suffered heavy losses, and decades of infrastructure were wiped out, leaving imperial dignity in tatters.
There have been too many reports proving that Trump wants to extricate himself from this situation, which aligns with his business mindset; if he can't profit, he quickly minimizes losses, which is why Vance can lead the talks.
Besides, Israel has even worse news.
This war has had a profound impact within the United States.
More and more people are dissatisfied with Israel's blatant dragging of the U.S. into the water; even a fool can see that the war has nothing to do with U.S. national interests and is purely for Israel's sake.
Recently in the U.S., a phenomenon has emerged where many political figures publicly cut ties with Jewish capital.
For example, Ruben Gallego, a Democratic Senator from Arizona, has pledged not to take sponsorship from the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee."
For instance, Brandt Herrera, a Republican candidate for Texas's 23rd district, who was promoted by Trump and is part of the MAGA faction, has openly stated he will not take sponsorship from the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee."
Those familiar with American politics know that the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee" (AIPAC) holds significant weight in American politics.
Many American politicians take money from this organization. In the past, few dared to oppose AIPAC; now, opposition to AIPAC is becoming public, even if "anti-Semitism" is politically correct, Israel's actions this time are too much.
Vance's attitude is merely a reflection of the overall public sentiment in the U.S.
So, is the U.S. going to withdraw from the war?
That’s wishful thinking, as Netanyahu has explicitly stated that they have prepared for this war for over forty years.
Forty years of manpower, resources, finances, and energy invested—how can they easily let the "cooked duck" that is America fly away? Israel and Jewish capital will certainly take more drastic actions.
There is not just one Loli Island. Israel's years of careful planning may very well come into play at this critical moment.
More importantly, although this war does not align with U.S. interests, an easy withdrawal is even less in line with U.S. interests. The core of American hegemony is dollar hegemony, and the pillar of hegemony is oil, commonly known as "petrodollars."
The princes agree to settle oil in dollars; in exchange, the U.S. military must protect the princes.
If Iran effectively closes the Strait of Hormuz, the princes' oil cannot be sold, and U.S. protection is minimal; having collected protection fees without delivering, will the princes still willingly pay in the future?
All of this could severely impact petrodollars.
Without giving Iran a heavy blow, the "petrodollar" system cannot be maintained. Once things reach this point, even if Trump wants to back out, many domestic interest groups related to petrodollars will oppose it.
So we see that despite overall public opposition to war, every vote in Congress to limit the war after it started, Trump has managed to pass, and the anti-war faction does not hold the upper hand in politics.
Perhaps this is exactly what Israel hopes for.