I’ll be honest — I keep going back and forth on $SIGN
Part of me still sees it as a slow-moving infrastructure play.
The kind you respect, but don’t expect much from in the short term.
So I treat it cautiously.
But then I zoom out, and a different issue keeps showing up. Not adoption. Not even demand.
Coordination.
Different apps, chains, and systems are all trying to make decisions — who qualifies, who gets access, who receives value. And they’re all doing it in isolation.
That’s inefficient.
Every system rebuilding its own version of “truth” doesn’t scale. It just creates more surface area for mistakes, exploits, and inconsistencies.
That’s where SIGN starts to feel more relevant.
It’s not trying to own the applications. It’s trying to standardize how those decisions get verified and shared.
If that layer works, coordination becomes easier without needing trust between parties.
It’s not something the market prices aggressively.
But it’s the kind of shift that compounds quietly.
I’m still not treating $SIGN like a conviction bet.
Just starting to see why ignoring it completely might be a mistake.