I used to think @SignOfficial was just another attestation layer. The more I looked, the more I felt the real idea is bigger: not building a giant new identity database, but creating a proof layer that connects systems that already exist. Birth records, national ID, bank KYC, passports — these are already there, but they live like isolated islands. SIGN’s angle seems to be that digital identity should not mean handing over all your data again and again. It should mean carrying verifiable proof that reveals only what is necessary. That is where selective disclosure becomes powerful. But the deeper question is control. If credentials live with the user, recovery, governance, and usability matter just as much as cryptography. Proof is important, but only if it can shape access, distribution, and trust in the real world. That is why this feels more serious to me than a simple attestation story.

#SignDigitalSovereignInfra @SignOfficial

$SIGN