As risk aversion spreads, why am I stubbornly focusing on the underlying logic of Sign at this juncture? Recently, the situation in the Middle East has made the market chaotic, and looking at the overwhelming liquidation data, I thought to myself, my brothers are probably frantically searching for safe-haven assets. Just in time, I reviewed Sign's white paper and products over the past two days. The more uncertain the macro environment becomes, the more I tend to delve into agreements that focus on geopolitical infrastructure. To put it simply, the more volatile the environment, the greater the theoretical demand for decentralized verification and identity consensus should be. I tried running Sign's proof generation process, and the overall smoothness was acceptable, with no bottlenecks. Next, I horizontally compared several current competitors. Don't boast about full-chain interoperability; after doing cross-testing with a certain well-established general protocol, I found that Sign's latency in cross-chain state synchronization is indeed somewhat lower. However, I also encountered a frustrating issue: currently, the front-end developer documentation is not user-friendly enough for third parties looking to integrate quickly. Let's look at the evidence before concluding; if Sign wants to truly capitalize on the benefits brought by this trust crisis, the granularity of the product experience still needs refinement. From the perspective of token economics, I've focused on the enabling logic of $SIGN these past few days. Many projects issue tokens that are just pure air, but I see some strong binding consumption scenarios in Sign's model, which is a bit promising. I'm not sure if this consumption rate can outpace inflation, but how would I verify it? I will write a script to continue monitoring the actual call frequency of on-chain data. Only when the real call volume increases can the narrative of geopolitical infrastructure take root. First, preserve life, then pursue further; no matter how good the logic, it is not appropriate at this stage to blindly heavily invest. I plan to take advantage of Binance's creation platform activities from March 19 to April 2 to further dig into some on-chain interaction details of Sign. The more the market panics, the more I want to clarify whether the project itself is undervalued. Over the next few days, I plan to delve into its contract activity levels, using real data to validate my assumptions. @SignOfficial #Sign地缘政治基建 $SIGN