I started using SignScan because I wanted to believe a clean digital record was the same thing as a settled answer. On the surface, it looks great. I can see the attestation, the issuer, and the signature right there in a nice, clear object. It proves the record exists and that it didnt just vanish because someone got nervous. But lately, I have noticed a gap between what is visible and who is actually responsible. When things get difficult or a claim is challenged, the clean screen provides a bit of false comfort.
The reality is that seeing a green light on a dashboard does not tell me if an institution still wants that claim carrying weight today. I have seen cases where the record stays perfectly intact while the actual support for it behind the scenes gets narrower and quieter. As the saying goes, the record is visible on Sign but the responsibility is'nt. We end up in this weird spot where the tech says one thing is valid, but the people in the room still wont own the claim. We start adding side notes and extra context just to keep files moving because the visible record stopped answering the real questions. I use it because the transparency is useful, but it reminds me that a digital signature is only as good as the person standing behind it right now.