A friend told Feng Zai: Alpha is always something to look forward to, hard to let go of 😢

Rumor has it! It's confirmed that there will be at least two ALPHA airdrops next week! They might go live on the same day～ Is it getting better?

Feng is really, really happy. NIGHT set the list yesterday, and Feng made it onto the list! What makes Feng happy is that on the last day, the added points made it to the daily growth list! Excited Feng quickly took a screenshot, the first time taking a photo with the big shots!✌️ (@快乐的小海豹 @链研社lianyanshe @DD-滴滴 are both big shots that Feng has been following for a long time.

One monk fetches water, two monks carry water, three monks have no water to drink.
Feng feels that this phenomenon also appears in blockchain: open protocols in blockchain always tend to degrade. Anyone can use them, but no one is motivated to maintain them. This is how most "public infrastructure" dies. Verified: Shared resources + individual rationality = collective destruction.

{spot}(SIGNUSDT)

Sign Protocol @SignOfficial positions itself in the document as "incentive-aligned public goods". When Feng first read this phrase, he thought it was marketing jargon, but after carefully looking through the mechanism, he changed his judgment. Its Schema registry is completely open: anyone can publish standards, anyone can use, anyone can verify, which is the characteristic of public goods. $SIGN tokens play an economic alignment role inside: those who create real value for the protocol, institutions that publish high-quality Schemas, nodes that participate in verification, and developers who connect to the protocol, all gain value distribution through tokens.
The design philosophy is: external regulation or redesigning the incentive structure to make selfishness beneficial to the collective. Forming a positive cycle: the more it is used, the higher the protocol value, the more value the token captures, the stronger the contribution incentives, the better the quality, and the more it is used.

However, Feng also has doubts: token prices are volatile, and incentive alignment requires stability. When token prices drop by 60% or 70% from their peak, can this carefully designed structure still withstand that "period when prices are very low but infrastructure still needs maintenance"? This isn't simply bearish. Feng believes this is a question that any token-driven public goods project must answer.

#Sign地缘政治基建

Do you think token incentives can survive a full bear market cycle? Share your judgment.