When I first looked at SIGN, I assumed a license or permit becomes trustworthy once it gets a hash. That feels tidy but misses the structure. What SIGN really supports is an attestation model where a schema fixes what a credential means, the issuer signs it, validity windows limit how long it counts, and revocation changes status later, so a certification is checked as a governed claim, not by reopening every private file.
With SIGN near a $52.5M market cap on $90.9M daily volume, only 1.64B of 10B supply circulating, and BTC still holding 56.39% of a $2.44T market, I read this as demand for audit rails under tighter scrutiny, not proof that trust is solved. The weak point is still who gets to attest.
@SignOfficial al#
SIGN
0.03242
+1.69%