I am getting more anxious while trying to simulate the SIGN Protocol to record travelers going to Jeddah.
In theory? Genius...
You get "digital proof" that cannot be debated.
But in the field????
I found a scary loophole: The Oracle Problem.
SIGN guarantees the original signature from the sender, but who guarantees the input data is honest? If the off-chain source can still be bribed before entering the protocol, then we only get garbage data.
The 2030 vision to become a futuristic smart city is great. The data of its citizens? Still using the old-fashioned way.
I see the adoption of $SIGN token there is still gray...
The team @SignOfficial needs to be more aggressive in introducing blockchain features there.
I also believe it's not just about the government in the middle east, but also about the international workers who are there.
They need to bring the narrative of signing regarding credential verification and its attestations to help the international workers there to "sign" their data using the sign protocol.
If more adoption using sign happens, the government will also move.
I am talking about millions of workers from various countries who rely on their fate in the middle east.
Their data must be protected and this is where the sign protocol is useful for them.
Their passport or visa data can be recorded and verified on-chain. No hassle. No fuss. No need to go back and forth to the office.
The government and agencies can get secure data. Workers can work comfortably..
@SignOfficial