The more I look at systems like Sign, the more I think the real question is not only what the protocol verifies, but who shaped the input before it ever reached the protocol. If KYC, sanctions checks, or eligibility decisions come from third parties, then how much trust is actually sitting inside the protocol and how much of it has already moved upstream? If a wallet is linked to a verified status, does that fully solve the identity gap or just formalize it? And if the evidence is clean but the upstream judgment is flawed, what exactly has been made trustworthy in the end?

#signdigitalsovereigninfra $SIGN

@SignOfficial #SIGN