Sign Protocol is one of those projects that reads well immediately, which is usually where I start getting careful.
The core idea is strong enough. Attestations, verifiable records, portable proof. It fits the kind of infrastructure story that people in crypto like to take seriously because it sounds foundational, and in fairness, it might be.
What makes me pause is how complete the narrative already feels.
Usually when something is genuinely early, there is still a little mess around the edges. Usage is uneven. The market does not quite know how to price it. The story and the actual behavior are still catching up to each other. With Sign Protocol, the framing feels more polished than the part I am still trying to measure.
That does not mean it is weak. It means I do not want to confuse a well-constructed thesis with proof that the thing has already earned its place.
So I am still watching it the same way I watch a lot of infrastructure plays in this stage. Not for whether the idea sounds good, because it does. I am watching for whether the conviction around it keeps building when the presentation matters less and the actual demand has to carry the weight on its own