Yesterday I chatted with a big shot in investment research, and he asked me: “What do you think is the difference between the ‘infrastructure’ and the ‘knockoff’ of Web3?”
I pointed to the recently added CB roadmap $SIGN and said: “The difference is that one is a ‘consumable’ and the other is an ‘art piece’.”
Many people buy coins like they buy lottery tickets, running away when they win. But the logic of Sign is more like “digital cement.” Just look at the current geopolitical situation; the cost of trust is absurdly high. If you want to prove on the chain that “this money is mine” or “this identity is real,” you have to consume the Sign protocol.
It’s like at a turbulent border checkpoint, where you hold a bunch of “passes.” In the past, these documents were issued by a makeshift crew, but now with Coinbase entering the scene, it’s like an official endorsement: we recognize this issuance system.
My friend, who only buys mainstream coins, silently opened his wallet and stored the Sign he originally planned to sell.
He said: “I suddenly feel that what I bought is not a coin, but shares in the notary office of the digital world.”
What do you think, will Web3 ultimately survive on ‘pump and dump’ or on ‘usefulness’? #Sign地缘政治基建 @SignOfficial
