Last week I came across news of a major partnership, but three different sources described the same event in completely different ways. If this were handled by an application instead of a human, it would be extremely difficult to determine which version is actually correct.
To me, this highlights the exact gap that $SIGN is trying to address
What stands out is that Sign isn’t just focused on storing attestations. It’s aiming to build a structured evidence layer—where claims are defined using a common schema, backed by traceable provenance, and can directly plug into application logic, whether at creation or revocation.
If these three layers work together, trust could shift away from manual human judgment toward something more systematic and verifiable.
I’m currently keeping an eye on SIGN with a small airdrop position—still down from the listing so far. But the bigger question for me is: is Sign actually building a true evidence layer?
@SignOfficial #SignDigitalSovereignInfra $SIGN