Adapted from an original post written by the Founder of WellsForAll
Blockchain-based philanthropy has expanded rapidly over the past decade, promising to bring transparency, efficiency and accountability to aid distribution.
Crypto donations in 2024 exceeded $1 billion, according to recent statistics demonstrating momentum, especially for philanthropic projects across Africa.
But in Africa, many of these initiatives have struggled to deliver meaningful, long-term impact.
According to Samuel Owusu-Boadi, Founder of WellsForAll:
Across the African continent, many crypto philanthropy initiatives are designed as moments – token launches, non-fungible token drops and campaigns designed to generate attention, capital and optimism in short bursts.
These hype cycles rarely account for what happens after the launch window closes.
No long-term systems are built to facilitate continued investment and oversight.
At the core of the problem is a mismatch between technological ambition and on-the-ground realities. Too often, blockchain philanthropy projects prioritize visibility and innovation over sustainability. They create short-lived interventions rather than durable systems that communities can rely on.
[WATCH] ‘Save the Children’ Charity in Rwanda Partners with Cardano to Accept Crypto Donations @SCIRwanda #Cardano @CardanoStiftung https://t.co/1xyJ7jdl0N via @Bitcoin KE
— Daphnee Cook (@DaphneeCook) July 15, 2021
Owusu says:
There is no shortage of donation campaigns for philanthropic projects in Africa. What is lacking is long-lasting infrastructure. When philanthropy is structured around visibility rather than durability, the result is predictable: short-term relief followed by quiet failure.
While blockchain can improve transparency in tracking donations, transparency alone does not solve deeper structural issues. Without local ownership, maintenance funding and clear governance frameworks, these projects risk reinforcing dependency rather than empowering communities. As one critique puts it, crypto philanthropy frequently builds “moments, not enduring systems.”
“Blockchain systems can record intent, but they cannot verify tangible outcomes in the projects that crypto philanthropy seeks to enable.
Academic research has highlighted that while blockchain may improve traceability, it does not automatically guarantee accountability or effect without additional systems that sit beside or within it to link the two,” says Owusu.
Many initiatives are designed externally and deployed into African contexts with limited input from local stakeholders. This results in solutions that may function technically but fail socially, lacking alignment with local needs, institutions and incentives. In such cases, blockchain becomes more of a fundraising narrative than a tool for development.
For blockchain to have real impact in African philanthropy, it must be treated as infrastructure, not marketing. That means committing to long-term planning, investing in local capacity, and ensuring systems can be maintained beyond initial funding cycles. It also requires accountability mechanisms that extend beyond the blockchain itself.
FUNDING | Human Rights Foundation Grants 1 Billion Satoshis (10 $BTC) to Support 23 Global #Bitcoin Projects – 4 Are African Projects
Spanning Latin America, Africa, and Asia, the latest cohort of recipients includes initiatives that build tools, foster education, and expand… pic.twitter.com/N89T2eP2i9
— BitKE (@BitcoinKE) April 4, 2025
Owusu describes how ignoring the local ownership aspect guarantees the inevitable failure of these initiatives:
This gap between digital transparency and physical reality becomes more frustrating when projects are designed without the input from the communities they aim to serve. Many crypto philanthropy initiatives are conceived and executed by teams that have never visited the regions affected by their decisions.
Without local leadership overseeing these projects, responsibility evaporates once funding slows. Infrastructure that lacks community ownership will deteriorate quickly. Without clearly defined custodianship and locally managed maintenance resources, even well-funded projects deteriorate once initial enthusiasm fades.
At times, crypto-backed charitable initiatives in Africa treat local ownership as a cultural nicety, or an afterthought, rather than the heart and soul of the project. Communities must co-manage and protect assets if those assets are expected to survive. Projects that treat beneficiaries as end users rather than stewards inevitably collapse.
Without these shifts, the gap between promise and reality will persist.
INTRODUCING | Stellar and PwC Launch a Financial Inclusion Framework to Assess and Judge Blockchain Projects in Emerging Markets
The framework was developed by analyzing 12 blockchain applications operating in:
* Colombia * Argentina * Kenya * The Philipines … pic.twitter.com/7AuKcjk4Wb
— BitKE (@BitcoinKE) October 11, 2023
Highlighting this temporary relief that creates dependency at the expense of dignity, Owusu says:
Considering these observations, it becomes quite clear that most charity tokens and crypto fundraising models are designed to deliver temporary relief. They perform well at mobilizing attention and capital quickly but struggle to support systems that operate year after year.
Shifting the aim toward structural infrastructure enables philanthropic projects to function as a type of economic infrastructure, where longevity and sustainability are properly accounted for, and not merely as a charitable intervention. When clean water systems, schools or clinics remain operational over long periods, they reduce dependency rather than reinforce it.
Dignity emerges not from receiving aid, but from creating systems from that aid that truly stand the test of time and endure.
Without long-term operational thinking, projects inadvertently recreate the very dependency dynamics they claim to disrupt.
Bitcoin Comes to Africa’s Largest Urban Slum – But Can It Deliver Real Financial Inclusion?
Owusu also higlights the long-term harm that these initiatives cause to the crypto industry.
The consequences of these failures extend beyond individual projects. Whenever an initiative collapses, or public trust in a crypto-backed charity project erodes, not only is the power of philanthropy questioned, but so is belief in blockchain itself. With these failures, skepticism toward future crypto-powered initiatives only gets louder.
Africa experiences this damage the most. Failed experiments leave behind broken infrastructure and weakened confidence, making it harder for responsible models to gain support and traction. Philanthropy should never be treated as an experimental case study or showcase for blockchain technology. When human well-being is at stake, failure is not as abstract as we like to think.
For the crypto industry, this represents a credibility challenge. If blockchain is to play a meaningful role in global development, it must demonstrate discipline, restraint and accountability — not novelty for its own sake.
Blockchain will continue to attract attention and capital, but fall short of delivering meaningful change for the communities it claims to serve. As critics argue, until the focus moves from hype to systems-building, from a marketing fundraising function to a governance infrastructure focus, crypto philanthropy will keep failing the real-world test in Africa.
EXPERT OPINION | ‘Bitcoin Adoption and Education Initiatives in Africa Look Impressive But Few Lead to Actual Adoption’
Stay tuned to BitKE for updates on crypto adoption globally.
Join our WhatsApp channel here.
Follow us on X for the latest posts and updates
Join and interact with our Telegram community
_________________________________________