I was returning to digital signatures in PDF files and noticed one thing: the signature remains “dumb”. It confirms that a person has pressed the button, but knows nothing about the state of affairs in reality. We have automated bureaucracy, but we have not automated the verification of facts.

Sign Protocol allows you to provide context to the signature through schemas (Schemas). It technically ties the digital autograph to external data — for example, a contract becomes valid only in the presence of certification from the logistics register or payment confirmation.

However, the complexity of obtaining data from the outside world creates new vulnerabilities. Any error from sensors or oracles makes the certification unreliable, and formal validity begins to seem more important than the actual state of affairs.

And here arises the question: will these technologies really help us see reality, or are we just accumulating ideal papers faster against the backdrop of unfulfilled promises?

#SignDigitalSovereignInfra $SIGN @SignOfficial

SIGN

0.03197

-0.28%