Recently, I specifically tested the cross-chain compatibility and mainstream ecosystem integration capability of $SIGN . I didn’t just rely on the official promotion of 'multi-chain interoperability', but rather tested one by one the compatibility with mainstream public chains, wallets, and industry protocols. I found that the project has completely turned itself into a closed island, completely disconnected from the mainstream Web3 ecosystem. I conducted continuous tests for 3 days, covering the four public chains with the largest user counts: Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, and TRON, along with two globally top wallets: MetaMask and Trust Wallet. The results showed that it only supports one-way cross-chain with BSC, with 19 cross-chain transfers tested, only 8 were successfully credited, resulting in a success rate of just 42.1%; among mainstream wallets, only Trust Wallet can barely adapt, while MetaMask, which has a market share of over 60%, cannot connect normally at all; the 'full ecosystem cross-chain interoperability, seamless integration with mainstream public chains, and multi-wallet compatibility' emphasized in the white paper actually has a practical implementation rate of less than 10%.
Previously, a developer focused on cross-chain technology mentioned in the community sharing: 'If a Web3 project is disconnected from the mainstream ecosystem, it is equivalent to locking itself in an island; users will not switch their entire usage habits just for one project.' #BTC
The more I test, the more I feel that $SIGN has completely abandoned ecological openness, not integrating with mainstream public chains, not compatible with general protocols, and not enabling cross-chain interoperability. No matter how grand the infrastructure narrative is, it can only be trapped in its own small circle and will ultimately be completely eliminated by the mainstream market. $BTC
BTC
65,895.38
-0.82%
SIGN
0.03303
+3.77%