It seems AI agents have really been overhyped
Can AI agents surpass in solving cybersecurity?
AI makes everything possible, but possible does not mean viable; the hidden costs down the line could be extremely high.
-Software, cybersecurity, a bit of hardware
-Even if AI replaces certain functions of software, the physical layer demands will not change; lower latency and CDN services are still required
-AI has caused an increase in traffic
-What if costs are increased based on the use of AI agents?
-Many people use OpenClaw, granting excessive permissions to AI agents, which may lead to severe cybersecurity disasters in the future
-The requirements for cybersecurity are very high; it must achieve 100% leak-proof and accountability. Are you sure companies will look for AI agents when something goes wrong?
#OpenClaw trend
-Currently, all AI Agents are not very helpful for MK; NotebookLM is sufficient
-In reality, people wouldn't really allow it to use their significant assets; they would all fear data leaks from OpenClaw
-In fact, Apple intelligence is somewhat like OpenClaw
-Imagine if Apple were to apply automation, it could be the Agent winner; the server layout in front for de-identification is quite interesting
-Is it possible that hardware is actually the biggest winner in the end?
-It's estimated that 99 people would rather let Apple see their data than an agent. After all, all confidential data is on their phones, and they are used to it, plus Apple is large and can be held accountable
-You might think that everyone should be quite smart, but often you really discover that people are not smart in many ways...
Buy and continue DCA stocks
Apple
Crwd
Net