I wrote an essay using the word SIGN, and as a result, the teacher scolded me for "getting off-topic," but I realized the profound meaning of "geopolitical infrastructure!"
In today's Chinese class, the teacher asked us to write an essay with the title "My Ideal." I originally wanted to write about being an astronaut, but all that came to my mind was the word $SIGN I saw yesterday. So I thought, my ideal is to be a signal sender!
In my essay, I wrote that I want to establish a super huge geopolitical infrastructure, just like @SignOfficial , to convey messages to everyone using SIGN. This way, if kids from two countries are arguing, I can send a signal to help them make up.
As a result, the teacher called me to the office and said I was off-topic. She also said I didn’t even know what geopolitical infrastructure was and wrote nonsense. I felt very wronged; I thought I wrote quite well. The teacher said I couldn't even distinguish between SIGN and geopolitical infrastructure.
I sat at my desk thinking for a long time and suddenly understood. What the teacher meant by "not being able to distinguish" was that the information wasn’t conveyed properly! Isn’t that the problem SIGN is supposed to solve? If the whole world communicated using @SignOfficial 's $SIGN , then everyone would be able to distinguish!
I mustered the courage to find the teacher again and explained the relationship between SIGN and geopolitical infrastructure to her. I said, SIGN is like a signpost on the road, and geopolitical infrastructure connects these signposts into a network so that everyone doesn't get lost.
After listening, the teacher was stunned for a long time, then patted my head and said, "You, kid, have studied quite deeply." I was extremely happy! It turns out my understanding was correct; SIGN is used to solve big problems! @SignOfficial , am I right?