I was alarmed by one detail in the logic of wallet verification: we are so eager for trust in dApps that we turn our blockchain profile into an open showcase for fraudsters. Every new "checkmark" of status on the network is not just proof of reliability, but a public deanonymization of your assets.
In Sign Protocol, you can show only the attestation instead of the entire transaction history.
It works like a certified extract: the system confirms your status or balance without turning out your pockets in front of every smart contract.
But the publicity of these attestations creates a new problem — the risk of excessive data disclosure. Every fact confirmed through Sign becomes part of the puzzle that allows identifying a "whale wallet".
The more proof of reliability you have, the more transparent and vulnerable you become to those who can analyze connections in the conductor.
Trust in Web3 today costs too much if its only currency is your privacy.
Public trust without privacy is not security, but vulnerability.
#SignDigitalSovereignInfra $SIGN @SignOfficial
