$ONT Eight-year-old coins resurrected, why doesn't Binance delist them?

Coin traders all know that exchanges make money by collecting trading fees. When a coin has been in a long-term price slump and lacks trading volume, exchanges will forcibly delist it. So why haven't old domestic coins like ONT and NEO, which have plummeted, been delisted?

In fact, there are personal relationships involved. Remember when Binance hadn't been established yet in 2017? The founder CZ was still a relatively unknown figure. The reason I say this is that back then, the prominent figures in the spotlight were Da Shu, the founder of domestic Ethereum AntShares, known as the thousand-fold coin of that year. There was also Xu Mingxing, the founder of OKEx, and Li Lin, the founder of Huobi, even Baoyeye, who sold beef. CZ was in Beijing raising funds, still on stage during the final segment of the AntShares brand launch event. CZ spoke in a not-so-standard Mandarin and said a lot, but the audience's response was not enthusiastic. Why? Because at that time, there were too many similar projects! Various projects could easily raise hundreds of millions with just a little packaging, and CZ's trading platform was indeed not very appealing at that time. However, Binance succeeded and became the largest exchange in the world, far surpassing the achievements of Huobi and OKEx. One must not forget their roots; to show gratitude for the initial recognition, Binance made exceptions for the AntShares system, including NEO, ONT, and even QTUM from the Shanghai gang. This is the deeper reason why other coins have been delisted while these have not.