What kept bothering me about $SIGN wasn’t whether something can be proven—it’s whether that proof can be found fast enough to matter. An attestation can be perfectly valid, but if apps still have to dig across chains just to locate it, the experience feels broken.
That’s where the shift happens: schemas + attestations aren’t just publishable—they’re queryable. The bottleneck moves from “can this be signed?” to “can this be discovered in time to be useful?” And that quietly turns retrieval into part of the trust layer itself.
But there’s tension here. When discoverability leans too heavily on one layer, that layer becomes a silent zone everyone is forced to trust.
What makes $SIGN more interesting is how it handles change. Instead of editing history, it embraces it—records stay permanent, and updates happen through revocation and new attestations. Nothing disappears, everything is auditable. It feels less like data storage and more like version-controlled trust.
That’s why I’m watching @SignOfficial closely. #SignDigitalSovereignInfra