Why then do events disappear when they are over?
@MidnightNetwork
You attend. You engage. You contribute.
However, subsequently, there is no actual evidence. Badge, perhaps nothing, just screenshots.
That is one of the gaps that most systems have never addressed.
Web3 attempted to correct it with proof-of-attendance. You get a token for showing up. It works, but it's limited. Tokens can be moved around, replicated in meaning and do not necessarily reflect actual engagement.
SIGN modifies the framework of such a concept.
Rather than issuing collectibles, SIGN transforms each event into a collection of attestations. Not only were you there but what was it.
The simplest form of the SIGN (token: SIGN) is data events.
Every transaction is a verifiable claim which is onchain.
Attend a conference? That's one data point.
Speak on stage? Another.
Complete a workshop? Another.
Both these are deprived as an organized certification. It could be a simple form of key-value that can be used to describe identity, time, role and outcome.
This is where the interest arises.
@MidnightNetwork
Such attestations are not mere assets as in the case of NFTs. They're proofs. They are not casually transferred and they are expected not to be traded but to be verified.
Instead of picking badges, you are making a history.
It has a history of activities that can be verified by anyone.
MidnightNetwork
And it alters the interaction.
Rewards can be given to the actual participation in the community.
Projects are capable of filtering the users in terms of real contribution.
Reputation is something that you do, not say.
MidnightNetwork
Events will not be a moment in the future.
They'll become data layers.