I've seen many family members involved in the creator tasks at the square
All trying their best to write an engaging opening, using various hooks to create a viral article
Using edgy methods, leveraging alpha trends, creating personas for making or losing money, all sorts of shady practices 😂
Actually, I think it's better to write the article well first, make slight modifications to the opening to attract some attention, and meet the minimum view requirements.
After all, the articles I write have never gone viral; they usually get only a few tens or hundreds of views, but I can still get the most basic article scores, earning thirty to fifty points a day, which should keep me stable in the top hundred.
Don’t spend too much effort on shady practices; if you’re not careful, you might be deemed irrelevant. Just honestly write projects; isn’t it nice to secure a guaranteed score?
The rules of the square keep changing, but the basics of content creation haven’t changed.
First, get the fundamentals right, then find ways to drive traffic. I'm also stuck on traffic right now.
Seeing those at the top getting hundreds of views in a day makes me envious.
I don't know the ratio of traffic scores to article scores, but it feels like traffic scores are given too much weight. Because of the high traffic scores, everyone is trying to find ways to game the system, and the score difference between the top and bottom is too large.
I think the proportion of traffic scores could be lower. For example, setting a cap on traffic scores for an article, like 10 points, and then giving traffic scores based on a tiered system according to views.
Some people write really good articles; they should also have a chance to compete for the top, rather than every activity only having those few people with traffic at the top.