The fact that Sign Protocol is addressing a much bigger problem than most Web3 applications is the reason I am able to keep returning to it. It is not merely the development of an additional layer of the product. It is trying to make trust portable. The concept that I am interested in the most is the attestation model: structured claims by schema, signed, queryable and adjustable enough to be in a public, private or hybrid state. As long as design is successful, the move to crypto-native coordination to institutional or even nation-state processes no longer qualifies as pure narrative and starts to look like infrastructure.

What is of interest though is how this can still be scaled. The bigger the aspiration the more the governance, its incorporation of developers, and its tradeoffs of privacy and long-term alignment of incentives. The trust layer is also of interest to the degree that individuals still remain with it after the campaign energy has been completed. Therefore, I am not very interested in branding, but boring signals: repeat integrations, the flow of actual issuance, and can attestations be normal backend plumbing. This is what would make this vision to be worth considering.

@SignOfficial #SignDigitalSovereignInfra $SIGN