i been thinking about Sign tokenomics for a minute now. especially that 40% vs 60% split.

at first glance it looks normal right ? pre TGE allocation team investors early backers get 40%. thats fine. takes years to build a project so yeah they keep some ownership. no issue there.

but heres the thing. how much of that 40% is actually locked ? how slowly does it release ? cause if you dont understand that part then the whole "decentralization" talk starts sounding hollow you know ?

then theres the other 60%. this part they didnt give to anyone upfront. its "to be earned" they say. meaning future users contributors ecosystem people whoever actually uses the network will get it over time.

sounds nice in theory. ownership follows contribution not just early money. but then you gotta ask... what does "earned" even mean ? who decides what counts as contribution ? which actions matter and which dont ? cause if a small group controls the reward logic then decentralization becomes kinda fake honestly.

still gotta admit the structure is thoughtful. keeping more than half the supply for future growth is rare. most projects dump everything upfront and hope for hype. Sign is basically betting that network growth will beat initial speculation.

so yeah theyre not just distributing tokens. theyre trying to design how people behave. risky. but also kinda important. @SignOfficial l $SIGN #signdigitalsovereigninfra