he same event now has two versions of truth. This is no longer a technical issue, but a conflict between two types of truth: system truth, which can be modified, and cryptographic truth, which cannot. @SignOfficial not determine what is true. It proves what was recorded and who attested to it. In the context of CBDCs, attestation should be understood as an evidence layer, while the ledger remains the settlement layer.
If a rollback occurs, the system must clearly define the role of attestation. Is it historical evidence, or is it considered a valid state? This cannot be resolved by code alone. It depends on governance, central bank policy, and how legal systems interpret such data.
In conclusion, Sign Protocol provides strong proof, while CBDCs provide necessary control. When combined, truth is no longer a single point, but a multi-layered structure. The real question is no longer what technology can do, but who has the authority to decide which version of truth is accepted. #SignDigitalSovereignInfras