I have been thinking about where SIGN really fits in the crypto infrastructure stack.
The more I understand it, the more I feel its success may depend not on how much it controls, but on how much it enables others.
I believe real trust infrastructure grows when it feels neutral.
When anyone can use it, build on it, and benefit from it without feeling locked in.
That is where proofs become powerful and credentials become meaningful.
I see SIGN’s biggest opportunity in showing the value of its protocol through products, but not letting those products turn it into a closed destination.
Because in the long run, infrastructure wins when it becomes a standard, not a gatekeeper.
I think the strongest SIGN will be the one that leaves the most room for builders, ecosystems, and new ideas to grow around it.